- Joined: November 2001
- Post Count: 2,489
Quote:
| You can think of a polarizer as an extremely fine grating with very narrow slits -- light waves can pass through only if they have the same orientation as the slits. |
That right there made the light turn on. Being a computer geek, I'm very familiar with things like anti-glare screens that perform a similar, if not identical, function.
Cool! I get it! Thanks!
John Berger
Owner/Webmaster, The Letterbox and Widescreen Advocacy Page
A Proud Member of the Artists Rights Foundation
http://www.widescreen.org
The HTF is now the official forum of widescreen.org!
- Joined: August 2001
- Post Count: 11,272
Quote:
| GHOSTS OF THE ABYSS was released in three formats. One, IMAX 3-D using field sequential glasses. |
So this is the version likely to hit DVD, to work with those "H3D" glasses like the ones that come with this?:

DAVE/Memphis, TN
...Want to see your favorite show on DVD?
- Joined: August 2001
- Post Count: 11,272
Quote:
| I seriously DOUBT that GHOSTS OF THE ABYSS will be released in 3-D on DVD. I think it will likely be a flat only release, expanded to a 90 minute version. Cameron hinted at this from the beginning. |
That would be too bad. This was a seriously great movie, that was very much enhanced by the 3-D effect (IMHO).
I would still enjoy getting the movie on DVD even if flat, and I guess an extra half hour of footage would be great (I say "I guess", because editing in the footage might upset or destroy the rythym of the film, which was superb).
Either way, I'll keep my eyes peeled for a release! Thanks for the info.
DAVE/Memphis, TN
...Want to see your favorite show on DVD?
- Joined: November 2001
- Post Count: 2,489
Quote:
| this did not work on my RPTV in progressive mode |
Wouldn't turning off progressive mode have taken care of the problem? RPTVs still use CRTs to get the image to the screen.
John Berger
Owner/Webmaster, The Letterbox and Widescreen Advocacy Page
A Proud Member of the Artists Rights Foundation
http://www.widescreen.org
The HTF is now the official forum of widescreen.org!
- Joined: November 2001
- Post Count: 2,489
Quote:
| I'm not even sure I know how to. My DVD player isn't progressive, but I've read that by using the Component outs into my tv, the Mits. will emulate a progressive signal. |
I have a Mitsu as well. Assuming that yours has the same guts that mine does, it will go into progressive scan mode only if it detects a progressive signal. Otherwise, will stay in 480i mode even over a component connection.
Well ... that's the way that mine behaves.
John Berger
Owner/Webmaster, The Letterbox and Widescreen Advocacy Page
A Proud Member of the Artists Rights Foundation
http://www.widescreen.org
The HTF is now the official forum of widescreen.org!
- Joined: August 2000
- Post Count: 531
Glad to hear I won't have to endure the embarasment of asking for a ticket at the cinema. I'll just say I'm renting the DVD for my kid brother or something.
I am Jack\'s empty signature bar.
- Joined: May 2003
- Post Count: 747
I thought this piece of news would be of interest to the 3-D fans who keep an eye on these threads (myself included):
http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/art-m.../29/12.00.film
My hope is that this will provide a further motivation (atop customer encouragement) for the major studios to follow IMAX's lead and finally support field sequential 3-D on DVD (though what 3-D system this remake will use is not specified -- I hope they at least issue polarized prints).
P.S. Mark (per your earlier post of a few months ago), from reports here and on other threads, it appears you can use the simultaneously active video outs on most DVD players to get around the composite limitation of Slingshot's synch box. Hook up a composite chord to the box, but keep your S-VHS, component, or DVI cables hooked up between the player and your actual display device. The box gets the signal it needs to synch the glasses, but you're only watching the superior signal from your player (don't connect the synch box to your television, in other words, only to your player).
I don't own the system, so can't test the theory myself just yet (I'll buy it in a heartbeat if studios issue any field sequential feature films to disc), and in fact I've never tried connecting two video signals simultaneously (I believe this is supported on most major DVD player brands; check your user manual to be certain), but as explained by others here this does seem to make sense, and sounds like a great work-around. Whether your player and display can be made to reproduce an interlaced (two field) image, or otherwise made to work with the system, is another matter, described by others here and on the Slingshot field sequential 3-D viewing system thread ...
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htfo...threadid=70448
... in much greater detail than I could hope to recap.
“That line was screwy.”
- Outtake
Warner Bros.' Breakdowns of 1938
- Joined: April 2003
- Post Count: 367
I loved this movie. I love all 3. Since the box set of the films is supposed to feature new special edition of at least the first one, i wouldn't be surprised if they went on ahead and made this one a two discer with the flat version so they won't have to go back and make one for the box set to please the angry people who wanted the flat version. I can ramble real well.
Jake J.
Chief?
McCloud!
"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few"
My Sweet Cuppin' Cake of a DVD Collectionwww.thedigitalbits.com
-
Ronald Epstein
- Ronald Epstein
-
- offline
- Joined: July 1997
- Post Count: 20,194
I was hoping this thread would resurface.
Without having to rescan through all these posts,
can someone simply answer me this...
Will Spy Kids 3D work on a RPTV?
Will it work in Progressive mode or not?
I'm curious, so I'll buy it. If it is not
supposed to work on a RPTV, I'll save my money.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Ronald J EpsteinHome Theater Forum co-ownerEmail me at:
repstein@hometheaterforum.com To View My Massive DVD Collection
Click Here
HTF Rules and Regulations
- Joined: May 2003
- Post Count: 747
Spy Kids: 3-D is red/blue anaglyph, I believe, which means it should be compatible with any display device (calibration may be an issue, getting the reds and blue equatable with the glasses; I'm not sure about that).
You'll find many posts here and on the other thread I linked a few posts ago concerning field sequential 3-D, Ron, which is a superior form of 3-D, but a type where various displays may have some trouble (to my understanding it requires two separate video fields, i.e. interlaced signals, to function properly, but many folks have posted interesting experiences with and possible workarounds for varying display types).
You'll also find a link to a remake of House of Wax in my earlier post here, though no word yet on what sort of 3-D system it will employ.
I'd go through the list of issues with and the importance of studio support for field sequential 3-D, but I've just typed it up in two different forms, here and in the Feedback Forum (under an existing WB thread)! I have to get some shut eye.
Heh. But in short, regarding Spy Kids: 3-D, so far as I've heard, it's anaglyphic and thus widely compatible. Front projection, rear projection, CRT, LCD, DLP ... it shouldn't make any difference, because the 3-D effect relies on the interplay or offset of two colors (red and blue), not the means by which the image is reproduced. If I have that wrong (it's gathered knowledge from around here and my own limited experience with anaglyph viewing, which I should say has only been with direct view CRTs), I of course welcome correction. Otherwise -- I hope that was of help, Ron.
“That line was screwy.”
- Outtake
Warner Bros.' Breakdowns of 1938
- Joined: October 2002
- Post Count: 367
This may be a little off topic but will 3D movies that use the glasses with two different colored lenses work for color blind people? I took my grandson to see Spy Kids 3D and with the glasses on I could not really see any 3D effects, without them the picture just looked terrible.
\"I reckon I\'d like some of them french fried pertaters. Mm-hmm.\"
Karl Childers
- Joined: December 1999
- Post Count: 2,127
Jim: probably not. Your eyes need to distinguish between green/blue and red for the anaglyph to work.