Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Home Theater Hardware  ›  Audio/Video Sources  ›  why does 5.1 sound better than 6.1?
Forum Nav More Forums | All New Posts | New Thread

why does 5.1 sound better than 6.1?

#1
Rating: 0
5/29/03 at 11:11pm
  • Joined: May 2000
  • Post Count: 134
A very broad statement, but I will explain. I own an Integra 7.1 receiver capable of reproducing THX EX and DTS ES (albeit matrixed). My receiver also has power for one rear speaker, or pre-outs for 2. I am running JM Labs Cobalt 816s up front, the cc800 for the center, and 2 PSB 1Bs as rears (I am replacing soon with sr800s in the rear). I have one speaker that I run as the EX rear speaker. This is an old Cerwin Vega bookshelf speaker I have had kicking around for years. My surrounds are 5 ft away from me, and the rear speaker is 10 feet away. I have the levels just about right, as well as delay settings.

When the EX is engaged with non EX encoded material, the surrounds are very weak, almost as if they are not on. When I disengage the EX, the volume and depth of the surrounds really opens up and fills in the space behind me as if the speaker was on. I haven't tried the rear speaker off while listening to THX EX or DTS ES encoded discs (as I was just thinking about writing this now), but is there any reason why this is happening? I was expecting the rear speaker to fill in the hole a little and make a fuller sound, not thinner.

Any ideas?

---
rob michaw

Export to Wiki
#2
Rating: 0
5/29/03 at 11:32pm
  • Joined: March 2002
  • Post Count: 455
Sometimes that is known to happen with THX-EX which is one of the reasons THX created THX ULTRA2 processing which solves this problem but I believe you have to use 7 speakers not 6 for ULTRA2 to turn on.

Daniel Smith

My HT
Export to Wiki
#3
Rating: 0
5/30/03 at 6:12am
  • Joined: August 2002
  • Post Count: 333
As Daniel suggested, try using 7 speakers, not 6. Even though both DD-EX and dts-ES decode 6 channels, THX, Dolby, and dts all strongly recommend using 7 speakers, that is, using two speakers in the back instead of just one, for the extended surround rear channel.

I assume that the Cerwin Vega is one of a pair. If so, use both. If not, get (borrow) a pair form a friend. Be careful if connecting two CV's to a single amp channel on your receiver. Many CV's are rated at 6 or even 4 Ohms. If they are less than 8 Ohms, wire them in series instead of in parallel (+ of one speaker to amp +, - of the other speaker to amp -, then the remaining two +/- speaker terminals to each other). If they are rated 8 Ohms and your receiver can handle a 4 ohm load, wire them in parallel.

Something else to try: reverse the polarity on the surround back speaker. It may be out of phase with the other two channels, which could cause the rear soundstage to collapse like you seem to be experiencing.
Export to Wiki
#4
Rating: 0
5/30/03 at 6:29am
  • Joined: February 1998
  • Location: New York City, Office space for rent - cheap!
  • Post Count: 19,271
Quote:
When the EX is engaged with non EX encoded material, the surrounds are very weak, almost as if they are not on.

This is precisely why EX (the basic variety) should not be engaged with standard 5.1 material.

An EX decoder extracts the rear center using the same approach that Dolby ProLogic uses for extracting a front center -- sounds that are equally present in the left and right are routed to the center. Now, in a track that's been mixed for EX, the sound designers know which sounds they want to route to the center, and they put those sounds equally in the left and right rears. Sounds that are supposed to remain at the left or right are weighted toward that speaker so that the the EX decoder leaves them there.

Many 5.1 soundtracks don't provide much differentiation between the left and right rears, even though they're discrete channels. When you engage EX decoding on such a soundtrack, the sound will collapse toward the center, just as you've described.

M.
Zoloft and Paxil and Buspar and Xanex, Depacon, Chronaphin, Ambien, Prozac,
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal)              HTF Rules & Regs     My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Export to Wiki
#5
Rating: 0
5/30/03 at 8:48am
  • Joined: December 1999
  • Post Count: 1,551
Very good explanation Michael. When I first got my receiver I was watching everything in EX or ES mode, now I have gone back to wathing 5.1 in normal 5.1 mode and only watching EX and ES encoded movies with the rears on. I too feel that 5.1 material does not sound as good on EX and ES mode compared to normal 5.1 mode.

\"I\'m your Huckleberry\"

Export to Wiki
#6
Rating: 0
5/30/03 at 9:55am
  • Joined: December 2002
  • Post Count: 191
Some movies that were intended only for 5.1 do sound better in EX/ES mode and some don't. YMMV
My Home Theater
My DVD Collection
“JBL S-Series + SVS = ” - Phil Iturralde
----------------------------------------------------
The Portland, OR & Vancouver, WA HT Meet Thread
Export to Wiki
#7
Rating: 0
5/30/03 at 1:19pm
  • Joined: August 2000
  • Location: Santa Clara, CA
  • Post Count: 5,707
There are some receivers and pre/pros out there with 6.1/7.1 modes specifically meant for use with "normal" 5.1 DD/DTS soundtracks too. Prevents the collapse of the rear soundstage that can happen with EX/ES. Rotel xS, Outlaw's (Cirrus') CES modes, Logic 7, Denon's "widescreen" mode (or something), etc.

If it's not worth waiting until the last minute to do, then it's not worth doing.

KevinVision 7.1 ...

Export to Wiki
#8
Rating: 0
5/30/03 at 6:59pm
  • Joined: May 2000
  • Post Count: 134
Thanks for the replies. I have known that 5.1 is not "made" to be played 6.1, but in early magazine reviews, I remember some reviewers commenting on the fact that this can enhance the movie. I assumed that it meant so across the board. I was wrong. I am also glad to see that others have found the same as I have, so I will not start questioning if my setup is somehow wrong.

Thanks.

---
rob michaw

Export to Wiki
#9
Rating: 0
5/30/03 at 9:38pm
  • Joined: August 2000
  • Location: Santa Clara, CA
  • Post Count: 5,707
Rob- I give you credit. A lot of people blindly (deaf-ly?) engage EX/ES decoding *believing* it must be better because it's newer. You actually listened to the effect on 5.1 material and heard for yourself, sometimes it works, and sometimes not...

If it's not worth waiting until the last minute to do, then it's not worth doing.

KevinVision 7.1 ...

Export to Wiki
Forum Nav More Forums | All New Posts | New Thread