What's new

Writing a letter to Warner about lack of lossless audio on their BRD (1 Viewer)

Douglas Monce

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
5,511
Real Name
Douglas Monce

This becomes the catch 22 however. To attract a new user base the studios have to release new product every week. There has to be the perception that blu-ray is alive and vital. Cut back on the releases and there maybe a perception that blu-ray is dieing a slow death.

If blu-ray is ever even going to be the next generation and not just a niche people have to be excited by it, and people don't get excited when there is just a trickle of movies coming out.

Doug
 

Dave H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2000
Messages
6,152

I agree. I'd love to pick up The Thing, but will have to wait for a qualified reviewer or screenshot comparisons by Xylon.
 

carpenterfan

Agent
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
33
Real Name
briane ivanitski
Hey Cees , sorry about my other thread. should have posted here. i don't mean to make a big deal of this and i feel i was not soliciting anyone , just suggesting if we had a few e-mails to write just to let them know how people on the forum feel about this , that's all. i will never tell anyone what to do or did not mean my thread to sound like that. again my apologies.
 

Michael Reuben

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 12, 1998
Messages
21,763
Real Name
Michael Reuben
From your other thread:

You do realize, don't you, that when you hear films in the theater, you're not hearing them in lossless audio?

M.
 

Todd Erwin

Reviewer
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
10,382
Location
Hawthorne, NV
Real Name
Todd Erwin

Dolby Digital, on 35mm prints, has a fixed bit rate of 320 kbps.

For DTS, in 35mm exhibitions, the actual audio is recorded in compressed form on standard CD-ROM media at a bitrate of 1,103 kbps.

It is possible, however, to hear lossless or uncompressed audio in a digital cinema, per DCI.
 

Michael Reuben

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 12, 1998
Messages
21,763
Real Name
Michael Reuben
How many cinemas in America today are so equipped? As I understand DCI, its purpose is to develop a set of specifications. The implementation is another matter. I'm talking about what people are hearing in cinemas now, not what they may be hearing in the future.

M.
 

carpenterfan

Agent
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
33
Real Name
briane ivanitski
Hi Michael ,yeah i know the theater is not in lossless audio. i was just looking forward to hearing these movies in uncompressed sound that's all.
 

Michael Reuben

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 12, 1998
Messages
21,763
Real Name
Michael Reuben
Higher resolution than the theater (and higher than standard DVD) isn't worth something to you?

In every double blind test reported to date, people have not been able to distinguish between the uncompressed source and Dolby Digital at 640 kbps, which is what Warner used on Speed Racer and will presumably use on Journey to the Center of the Earth. That's why it's considered accoustically transparent.

M.
 

Bryan^H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
9,515
I'll be honest I'm only in Blu-Ray for the picture quality.

Is lossless so much better than DTS? Also, Do you you have to have higher end speakers(and speaker cables) to fully appreciate it? Because I have a pretty mid grade home theater set up. Thanks!
 

Dave H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2000
Messages
6,152
I like a release to contain lossless and I think it should, however, I will still purchase a BD movie even if it's without it. PQ is #1 for me.
 

Cees Alons

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 31, 1997
Messages
19,789
Real Name
Cees Alons
But only if the special cinema has a digitised movie that conforms to the proposed standards. I think Inside Man was the only commercially available DCI movie, and I'm not sure even about the sound tracks of that one.

Serenity also did have one DCI showing, but it has never been widely distributed (in fact: not distributed at all, AFAIK) as such.


Cees
 

frankie108

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 31, 2008
Messages
82
Real Name
Frank P
The PUBLIC as you call couldn't care less about the Blu-ray format as they watch their DVDs and HD broadcasts and are quite content.

I for one would like to see MORE titles to feed my new Blu-ray player - not less.

BTW I just sent a letter to Warner Bros expressing my satisfaction for the release of HOW THE WEST WAS WON!!! I think letters praising outstanding releases would have more effect than angry bitchy letters.
 

Adam Gregorich

What to watch tonight?
Moderator
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 20, 1999
Messages
16,530
Location
The Other Washington
Real Name
Adam

Good for you. We tend to over-focus on the bad and WB has done a lot of good releases. They need to know that we appriciate their work on those titles and that we are buying them and will buy more like them.
 

David Wilkins

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jul 5, 2001
Messages
967

You make a valid point, but I think that the nature of the experience is completely different. The experience of listening at home, especially with a higher end audio system achieves much more in the way of richness and subtlety. Theaters are intended to be overwhelming sensory experiences, where we're awed by a 40-foot (or whatever) screen and high horsepower audio that we're supposed to feel as much as hear.

I'm not a "no loss-less = no sale" person, but these titles are bound to be released again with loss-less audio and who knows what other added perks, and that's part of the issue. Warner hasn't released a statement about the matter, so we're left to wonder if this is a fundamental new approach on their part, separate from the BD50 problem. Either way, it's fair and reasonable for people to express themselves about it in a tactful manner. It would be much easier for consumers to know how to react if they knew about Warner's philosophy and intent; otherwise all we can do is wonder how long to let it go without a response. We're left to wonder about their next decision, and how shocking it might be.

I didn't pay nearly as much attention to the audio presentation of a film until hi-def came along. Since then I've been carried away by many an audio presentation, and all of them have been via loss-less audio. Maybe that's just coincidence.

As far as I'm concerned, the title itself is most important, followed by video presentation, then audio presentation. The overall issue is the promise of hi-def, and BD in particular. The capabilities are there, and they should be maximized unless there's an over-riding reason for not doing so. If lower res audio is just a part of Warner's new philosophy, then it's worth our feedback. If it's purely the BD50 issue, then there's more than one approach. Since Warner does release such a large volume of work, I don't think the public would object to a slower roll-out of certain titles, if the public understood why; that's where we get back to a statement of intent, from some reliable source.
 

JediFonger

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
4,241
Real Name
YiFeng You
the other "catch-22" i can think of is if u don't buy the BD now, WB will deem it less profitable to 'double dip' later on and therefore u just might not see that 2nd dip for a LONG LONG TIME. it's almost like we have to buy the lossy version first... before they 'award' us with the lossless. that to me, is the conundrum.
 

Viper

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
388
Real Name
Joe Fisk
Warner really pisses me off. There are still a lot of movies I want, but I hate those snapcases so much I refuse to buy the SD releases. I can't believe they haven't been completely phased out yet. :frowning:
 

bases1616

Agent
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
43
Real Name
Alex
Here is a nice article I copied from *HDTV News, Views & Reviews. It has some good points about the lack of lossless audio on titles like Speed Racer and Journey to the Center of the Earth.



Warner's Blu-ray Discs Have Me at a Loss

I am somewhat disturbed at the recent Blu-Ray releases from Warner Brothers for their failure to include a lossless audio track. In particular, the last two major releases from Warner Brothers on Blu-Ray, namely Speed Racer and Journey to the Center of the Earth, did not include either a Dolby True HD or DTS HD Master Audio track. All that was included was a plain ole Dolby Digital track of the kind found on the standard DVD.

As far as I am aware, there has been no explanation from Warner Brothers as to why a lossless track was not included on either release. I can only surmise that a lossless track was not included for reasons of lack of space. Speed Racer was issued on a 25 GB disc which had less storage capacity than at dual layer HD DVD. Perhaps, given tight space, Warners decided that they would rather maximize the video encode at the expense of the audio rather than compromise both. However, that could have been avoided had the release been issued on a 50 GB disc which would have provided more than enough space.

I find it very odd for Warners to abandon HD DVD partially due to its lack of storage capacity as compared to Blu-Ray and yet, issue a major release without a lossless track. The same is true for Journey to the Center of the Earth. While Journey was issue on a 50 GB disc, I can only assume that there was not enough storage capacity for a lossless track while including a 2D and 3D version of the film on the same disc. If that were the case, the film should have been issued on two 50GB discs, one 2D with a lossless track and one in 3D with lossless track.

Amazingly, a film like Run Fat Boy Run, issued by Warner Brothers via their New Line subsidiary, was not only issued with a DTS HD Master Audio track, but a 7.1 track to boot. While I enjoyed Run Fatboy Run, it did miniscule box office compared to either Speed Racer or Journey to the Center of the Earth. If Run Fatboy Run warranted a 7.1 lossless track, it is really hard to argue that Speed Racer and Journey to the Center of the Earth didn’t warrant at least a lossless 5.1 encode.

I would suggest to Warners that all their movie releases on Blu-Ray include a lossless audio encode in either Dolby True HD or DTS HD Master Audio. Lack of disc space should not be an issue. All major releases should be issued on a 50GB disc which would have more than enough space for a lossless track. Any 3D version of a film should have its own separate disc to insure the inclusion of a lossless track. Given the premium prices being asked for Blu-ray releases, they should include not only the best video presentations but the best audio presentations as well. Standard DVD just does not cut it.
 

Jason Seaver

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
9,303
If by "nice", you mean "agrees with one's own thoughts", yeah. Nothing we haven't read on the forum, with even less exploration of just why Warner might have wound up using a BD-25 for Speed Racer than the average thread on the subject.
 

DaViD Boulet

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 24, 1999
Messages
8,826

Most of Warner's lossy-only BDs had plenty of room for lossless via Dolby TrueHD, even though some of them are BD25. Some recent titles that had room for lossless but still didn't get it include Interview With a Vampire, Cool Hand Luke, and the new A Christmas Story... all which got lossy Dolby even though there was plenty of bitspace/bandwidth for TrueHD. There may be some BD25 titles that genuinely don't have space for TrueHD, but that list is much smaller than the number of lossy-only titles Warner continues to release.

Warner's primary problem seems to be one of internal politics and a lack of regard for audio transparency except when they feel it really matters... unlike other studios who manage to put lossless out on every title, BD25 releases included. Warner has even released lossy-only audio on some BD-50 releases if they deem the audio doesn't warrant (a false assumption that some material deserves lossless, and some does not, revealing that someone in the production chain lacks an understanding of the benefits of lossless versus lossy).

Perhaps they're using lossless as a ploy to play hard-ball with contracts for an increased share of BD50 replication. But the actual connection between BD25 and lack of lossless audio is one of choice by the studio. One that needs to change, and fast.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,818
Messages
5,123,889
Members
144,184
Latest member
H-508
Recent bookmarks
0
Top