Would you buy one of your Fav. Movies if it was ONLY on P&S DVD?.... I Did :(

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Marc Carra, Apr 29, 2002.

  1. BrentPollard

    BrentPollard Second Unit

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2001
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    0
    No I would not purchase a P&S version, however I would consider renting.[​IMG]
     
  2. Neil Joseph

    Neil Joseph Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 1998
    Messages:
    8,341
    Likes Received:
    1
    Real Name:
    Neil Joseph
    I would not buy. I would set up a petition if I had to but, no sale if P&S.
     
  3. Aaron Garman

    Aaron Garman Second Unit

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2001
    Messages:
    382
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello all. I am the biggest supporter of OAR that I know this side of the Mississippi. However, I am not going to go ballistic if I cannot watch certain films OAR. For some films, it can be quite hard to get them OAR. In my film class, we were only able to get a Hong Kong film Chun King Express in MAR. Even though I don't like viewing a film in MAR, I still thouroughly enjoyed the film and reccomend it to you all. Although I fully support OAR, and will do what I can to get a film OAR, I am not going to dismiss a film if it has not been released in OAR yet. So in the case of Chun King Express MAR will suffice until I can see it OAR. However, watching Star Warsin MAR is a complete NO NO and totally against the rules in my book! LONG LIVE LASERDISC!

    AJ Garman
     
  4. Mitch Stevens

    Mitch Stevens Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Messages:
    581
    Likes Received:
    0
    I own two pan & scan discs:

    Hellraiser 3 (Because it isn't available in widescreen).

    Child's Play (I have the rest, and I needed to complete the collection).

    "Warlock" is a favourite of mine, but only available in pan & scan. I still have not bought it, in hope that they may someday release it in OAR.

    If in 3 years, it is still not in Widescreen, I might buy it. I have the VHS of it right now, so I'm not in any rush, even if it is one of my favourite films of all time.
     
  5. MichaelAW

    MichaelAW Second Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2002
    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    0
    I haven't bought one yet, but I've been so tempted to buy Fearless by Peter Weir for so long since it's only P&S. Argh! [​IMG]
     
  6. PhilipG

    PhilipG Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2000
    Messages:
    2,003
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have two pan/scam only discs in my collection:
    The Ipcress File (R2) - I didn't realise it was pan/scam, but I bought it very cheap, and now that I have the OAR R1 Anchor Bay release, I use it to demo how very evil pan/scam is.
    Transformers The Movie since a widescreen version apparently could never be released.
    Oh, and The Man With Two Brains, which is open-matte, so I use zoom to get OAR.
     
  7. Greg Warner

    Greg Warner Auditioning

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 1998
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have one..."Crumb". 4:3 IS it's OAR. As for anything else..NEVER!

    Greg
     
  8. Michael St. Clair

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think there is a big difference between advocating P&S and admitting that you might buy it for a handful for certain films you love and it is the only way you can see it without buying a 35mm projector and print.
    Also, I think for the hardcore film buff, there is a large difference between pan-and-scan and true open-matte (where it does exist), as you can restore OAR to the latter with your own matting.
     
  9. Dave_P.

    Dave_P. Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 20, 1999
    Messages:
    983
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is it generally the rule that a 1.85:1 film that is "fullscreen" is always open matte? I know that a 2.35:1 film will always be Pan & Scammed (unless shot in Super 35), but I was wondering if 1.85:1 films are always spared that treatment?
     
  10. Marc Carra

    Marc Carra Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1997
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, good news, sort of. Upon further viewing, "White Fang" is in 4:3 open matte. Using the the letterbox zoom feature of my Panasonic RP91, the image is perfectly framed on my widescreen set. As good as a non-anamorphic letterboxed transfer? Yes. As good as it could have been? No.

    Marc.
     
  11. Deane Johnson

    Deane Johnson Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 1999
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    0
    With the exception of vintage OAR 4:3 movies, I never buy anything but anamorphic wide screen. Never.

    Deane
     
  12. Michael St. Clair

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  13. RobertR

    RobertR Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 1998
    Messages:
    9,690
    Likes Received:
    159
    I have not, and will not, buy a P&S disc.
     
  14. Raine Linton

    Raine Linton Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2001
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    I bought "From Beyond" because I know it will never be redone in widescreen. It just wasn't that popular a movie and my video tape was worn out. No regrets BUT I promise not to do it again.
     
  15. Jerry Gracia

    Jerry Gracia Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 1998
    Messages:
    537
    Likes Received:
    0
    I own one DVD in 4:3 that should have been given a theatrical widescreen aspect ratio...Transformers: The Movie.
    Only because it is close to my heart as a childhood favorite and the fact that its appearence on DVD itself is a miracle.
    Some folks here mentioned that you can matte a full frame transfer by simply matting it yourself...well, I disagree with that to a certain extent.
    Yes, by definition (theoretically), you could just matte off the full frame transfer to a 1.85:1 approx. ratio...but keep in mind that most times on a 4:3 "full frame" transfer certain shots and/or sequences in movies are zoomed-in or changed to maintain the original intent to a certain degree. By artificially matting a full frame movie yourself, these sequences will be that much more altered/cropped.
    I much prefer a properly matted transfer as opposed to a "full frame" one.
    With the exception of Transformers, I can say with confidence, I will not buy any non-OAR DVDs and have not since.
     
  16. Deane Johnson

    Deane Johnson Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 1999
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  17. Kenneth Vestergaard

    Kenneth Vestergaard Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2000
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    No.

    It's not the same movie anyway.
     
  18. Rain

    Rain Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2001
    Messages:
    5,020
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yup, this thread is a great idea. Let's all show the studio lurkers that we'd buy anyway--P&S or not. [​IMG]
    I wouldn't care if it was 2001 or Vertigo. If it was P&S only, I would do without. No exceptions.
     
  19. PatrickL

    PatrickL Second Unit

    Joined:
    May 13, 2000
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have more than 800 discs and not a single one is p&s.

    I consider open-matte a lesser evil, but I still won't buy it (the rare special case like Kubrick aside).

    Just to add: Jerry is right - often the true OAR can not be recovered in an open-matte transfer because of repo-ed shots.
     
  20. Dave Anderson

    Dave Anderson Second Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 1999
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    0
     

Share This Page