But what about shows that have been sitting in their valults for 50 years and were never ever transferred from film to video for syndication? These have not been seen by anyone for 50 years. True, they have stored and not destroyed the film elements, but how is that showing high value in the product? It has been stated that transferring a show from film elements can cost thousands of dollars an episode. If they didn't feel that was a risk they would have done it with all shows long ago and made them available, but they haven't. Why? Unless possibly because they don't value them as much as you think.jimmyjet said:1) i think the studios highly value their original filming. i say this for various reasons. first, it is a limited commodity. the shows that have been created are just that. they cant add any more to this. they of course can film a new show. but compare the cost of transferring a show already on film, to that of shooting a completely new series from beginning to end.
if they didnt value their show, they would not be holding onto it so dearly, and charging exorbitant fees for it. all this shows me that they place a high value on it. so for me, it is only a question of when, not if the show will be released.
And as for charging high costs, if a studio really isn't in the business of releasing older content or prefers to do it in house when they do, and someone knocks on their door asking (i.e., an independent), chances are they are going to quote a high price since that is what business generally does.
Yes, new shows cost more money to produce them transferring older shows, but that is what they do. Why do you think so? Maybe because even with that cost, new shows have the potential to bring in more money. New shows play on major networks and cable stations with major advertising benefits. New shows catch the publics attention. They aren't regulated to small independents for syndication like older shows. For the studios, the differences between new content and older content in syndication has not changed and never will.
I watched Room 222 when originally aired and i would watch it again. However, while well written and acted, it can be dated at times. Boston Public was done in the 90's about school issues with teachers and students, and was current to the times. It would probably do much better in syndication then Room 222 for the majority of people.jimmyjet said:2) the idea of making a series is to sell it. the human equation does not change. a show that has value today in that regard, will have value at any time in the future. a show like 222 was well-written, and well-acted, and the meaning of the show will always have value. so at any point in time, all a releaser would need to do is some advertising. a well written show can be easily advertised to sell.
The studio could pay to remaster Room 222 to bring the elements up to par for syndication, advertise it, and have it syndicated on some indpendent channel. But they haven't. Why? Maybe because it wouldn't justify the costs to do so. The human equation and well written and acted shows are not something that could only be done in the past, they are done now and are up-to-date with current moral and social issues. I think the main issue is that while production values and quality are higher in much of todays programming, so is the explicity nature dealing with violence, sex, and language. While many here may have issue with some or all of those changes, it is obviously not the case with the general public. The studio's produces what sells, and the demographic for shows like Room 222 is not the major advertising demographic anymore.
The upcoming releases for Wonder Years, WKRP, and Batman, are all in a different ballpark then what I am pointing out here. Everyone knows they would make money if released because the demand has been stated over and over. The fans knew it and the studio knew it. The reason for all the pessimism here has been because of the frustration since they were known quantities and people have been waiting 10+ years for their releases. So it really was just getting all the righs holder to finally agree.jimmyjet said:3) every product has short-term dollars, and long-term dollars to it. just look at how paranoid these music rights holders are. as is evidenced in wonder years and wkrp, most of them are willing to sign agreements as long as they are not giving away the store in the FUTURE. i emphasize that word, because as stated, this is not just about current dollars.
However, once they were announced you had a habit of declaring many other shows as evetually coming that are in a completely different status. These are the types of shows I'm referencing. Shows that were never transferred and have stayed dormant for 50 years, shows that have seen little syndication, shows that failed in early release attempts, shows with little name recognition. We see with CBS what they have remastered. We see what WB is doing with their catalog. We see that the upper eschelon of shows have been released. We know that the farther down the list we go the more costly and risky the venture is for any of them to be released. The long term value is in syndication and that means HD going forward, which costs more to prepare for. What we are questioning is how far into that catalog they are willing to go and how much risk they are willing to take. It would appear things are starting to level off by all indications.
This isn't all based on just generic business assumptions, it is based on the history of this market and what has been successful and what hasn't. Sure, some shows will sneak past this because an Encore picks up the cost and they can be pointed out as successes. But based on the overall numbers of how many of these types of shows have never seen the light of day in in syndication or a release, those successes are but a small percentage of reality.