Why get TVs?

Discussion in 'Displays' started by Sacha_C, Nov 28, 2003.

  1. Sacha_C

    Sacha_C Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm having a hard time understanding why people here still mostly buy TVs when they can get a much larger and better picture for cheaper with a projector.

    I understand if your budjet is below $1000 then you dont have much choice, but other than that, unless you have a room with absolutly no light control, what are the advantages of a TV, if any?

    Thanks
     
  2. STLMIKE

    STLMIKE Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 1998
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    W/a projector you have: expensive bulbs, ambient light issues, having to sit in a darkened room while watching regular TV (not just movies), having to power up a receiver to get audio for any kind of TV programming (not just movies).

    IMO, I would only ever want a projector in a dedicated HT setting (i.e. not in my living room).
     
  3. Neil White

    Neil White Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 1999
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Existing furniture, room layout, desire for full HD capability (without spending a small fortune), personal preference of PQ. In other words, there are several factors. I personally will go FP when my budget allows me to completely redo my HT room with furniture and layout changes. The availability of reasonably priced HD performance and something that in my personal opinion offers a great picture will also sway me.

    This is not meant as a detrimental comment towards FP. It's just my reasons for not going there yet.

    N
     
  4. Sacha_C

    Sacha_C Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    0
    The bulbs look expensive but it comes to less than $10/month and thats with heavy use so its not that much.

    And if you have a receiver why would you use crappy stereo from the TV when you can get 5.1 with prologic 2 or DD5.1 if you have digital cable. Why would you buy a receiver and only use it for movies? My receiver is my only sound source and it always on during the day when I'm home.

    I agree about the ambient light but many projectors are viewable with moderate lighting.
     
  5. Garrett Lundy

    Garrett Lundy Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2002
    Messages:
    3,764
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ambient light is probably the largest issue because designers and architects feel this need to just add windows to every room of a house [​IMG].

    Other factors:

    *Cost.

    *Set-up & maintenence complexity

    *Not easy to use (try explaining how to work a universal remote and six devices switched through a reciever to my GF when she just wants to watch her "stories").

    *Most TV fare looks like poop when shown larger than 32"
     
  6. STLMIKE

    STLMIKE Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 1998
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    I typically don't power up my receiver if I'm just going to watch the news, a documentary, even sitcoms, etc. I would be more likely to on a drama or if it was a movie broadcast on TV, etc.

    I hadn't considered the PQ issue, but on my 50" widescreen RPTV, the cable picture really isn't that good (admittedly, this may be an issue w/my cable), especially in stretch mode -- it is better if I view in 4x3 mode.

    Also, there are times that I want to have the lights on while I'm watching TV -- either when I have people over, or if I'm eating dinner in the living room, etc.
     
  7. Jeff Gatie

    Jeff Gatie Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    6,531
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ambient light, room limitations, bulb cost ($10 a month is more than $0 a month), ease of use, CRT quality in a projector costs a fortune, etc.

    If I had a dedicated room, I would probably opt for a projector for movies and a RPTV for regular tv watching. Since I do not, I enjoy the High Definition CRT based quality of my 56" RPTV at a distance of 7 feet.
     
  8. ChrisWiggles

    ChrisWiggles Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,791
    Likes Received:
    1
    Because the priorities to get a TV may be many.

    For instance, I ask myself this question all the time: Why the heck would anyone buy a digital projector under maybe 5-10k? I sure couldn't live with that kind of PQ when I can have a CRT fp instead. Obviously that's even another ripple of complication that most people aren't willing to deal with.

    Obviously there are a LOT of priorities other than having a BIG picture, such as room lighting, ease of use, setup, picture quality, etc etc.

    My .02
     
  9. Sacha_C

    Sacha_C Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    0
    "bulb cost ($10 a month is more than $0 a month)"

    But a projector is MUCH cheaper than a TV for the same size, so even after 5-10 years it still ends up cheaper.

    "Why the heck would anyone buy a digital projector under maybe 5-10k?"

    Have you ever seen a projector? Even the $999 X1 gives amazing quality for the price.
     
  10. ChrisWiggles

    ChrisWiggles Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,791
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yes I've seen many, and I couldn't live with much less than a high-end DLP, and then only maybe. Can't stand the lack of blacks, rainbows, or SDE.

    I'd rather have an RPTV than all that.

    That's why as I mentioned, I own a CRT fp. There's no comparison. And running a CRT is even cheaper still than a digital. No bulbs burning out all the time.

    Again, it's a matter of priorities. The setup and size is something I'm willing to do. Many people aren't willing to deal with this. So they buy the cheapo digitals, which throw a decent enough picture. My priorities are picture quality, and picture quality only. And from MY perspective of PQ it's baffling as to why people use digitals, but totally understandable.

    And size is not the only thing for PQ. Again as I mentioned, I'd rather have a good quality RPTV than a much huger, and inferior pj. Thankfully CRTs are plentiful and so I can have both.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. chris_clem

    chris_clem Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  12. Sacha_C

    Sacha_C Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    0
    The X1 only has the rainbow problem, and only very few people see them. And SDE and black levels are LCD problems.

    "And running a CRT is even cheaper still than a digital. No bulbs burning out all the time."

    You still need to replace the tubes in CRTs, sure they last almost 10 times longer, but cost at least 10 times as much.
     
  13. ChrisWiggles

    ChrisWiggles Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,791
    Likes Received:
    1
    I see rainbows on most single-chip DLPs. And black levels on any digital just don't do it for me (yet). The only digital projector I've seen without SDE (I mean for all purposes TOTALLY without) is sony's SXRD. Absolutely stunning pixel packing, and you don't get that little blemish in the center of each pixel as you do with DLP, another distraction for me.

    TV: "I like that one" - you place it in a corner and you're done!

    [digital]FP: "I like that one!" - Redecorate, eliminate light sources, calculate throw distances, BUY SURROUND SOUND, choose screen, etc, etc.

    CRT-FP: Above + Make sure tubes are in good condition, make sure unit works, ship it, or drive to go get it, get a bunch of buddies to help you hang it, build an HTPC that's stable, spend many weeks setting up your CRT to get the best picture. Again, it's just the most complicated way to go, but it's the best way to go.

    This gets debated forever, but the comparisons are in CRTs and digitals that cost more like 20K and up. Having that same level of performance in your home for under 10K, and often WELL under 5K is QUITE a sacrifice in time and effort. There are lots of great digital FPs under 5K, but none that can touch a well-done CRT FP at that same price.

    My goal wasn't to debate digital versus CRT. My goal was just to point out that people approach buying displays from VERY different perspectives, with very different goals. I'm just pointing out that while from YOUR perspective it's silly to get a TV when you can get a projector and a huge screen for less money. Likewise from MY perspective it's silly to get a digital projector for such little money when you can get a far superior projector for the same. So while my perspective is that if you are buying a display more than $500, you probably should look into a CRT projector. And perhaps my perspective is just as silly as yours when most people just want a regular no-fuss TV....

    [​IMG]
     
  14. John S

    John S Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,460
    Likes Received:
    0
    Unless your HT room is a dedicated one, FP just doesn't work. It is that simple.

    I just ordered my new RPTV recently and still feel it was by far the best deal and fit for me.

    I looked at all technologies, and kept comming back to RPTV to meet my needs.
     
  15. Sacha_C

    Sacha_C Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Unless your HT room is a dedicated one, FP just doesn't work. It is that simple."

    That's ridicoulus, my room wont be dedicated at all, and why would it change anything? Is there a camera that comes out of the projector and then looks and thinks "a table? a desk? a printer? this isnt an dedicated room! I refuse to power on!".

    I'm sure many people have a projector in a room that isnt dedicated.
     
  16. Jon_Heidbreder

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2003
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    So do FP's work then if there is sun light coming into the room. I was under the impression it would be difficult to see in a room with a lot of sunlight?

    The other thing is what do you project it onto? Is there some drop down screen that you have?

    I must admit I dont know that much about FP.
     
  17. mark alan

    mark alan Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    620
    Likes Received:
    0
    My question is, why only get a tv or a projector? Get both. I have a 36" tv and front projector in my basement. it is by far the best way to go.
     
  18. Jason Brent

    Jason Brent Second Unit

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm in this debate right now. I was looking at about a $700-$800 budget, maybe $1000 max for a good deal.

    I know I can get the X1 for that range or less. But most of my watching is cable. I don't want a crappy PQ. Right now I've been looking at the sales on the 36" direct views......

    Is the X1 comparable to the PQ on a direct view set for SDTV?
     
  19. Sacha_C

    Sacha_C Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    0
    At the same image size, the quality will be much better on the projector, in fact it will always be better on the projector but if you go too big it will just magnify the imperfections, but if you sit far enough it shouldnt be a problem.
     
  20. george kaplan

    george kaplan Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2001
    Messages:
    13,063
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well some of the debate in this thread about which type of projector, what the problems may or may not be, lead to a degree of uncertainty which is what keeps me from going the FP route.
     

Share This Page