Brian Perry
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- May 6, 1999
- Messages
- 2,807
I was thinking about this the other day during a discussion about the movie Random Hearts. To me, it's one of the worst/cheesiest names for a movie and probably turned off many people from seeing it.
Was it the producer, studio, director, or writer who chose the title, or a collaboration? What is typical?
I know in some cases the title is changed after marketing tests reveal problems. For example, the Bond film Licence to Kill was originally called Licence Revoked, which corresponded to 007 losing his authorization to kill. The problem was that research found that something like 50% of the public didn't know what the word "revoked" means, so it was changed to the universally known "kill." (At least they kept the British spelling of Licence.)
[Edited last by Brian Perry on August 21, 2001 at 10:51 AM]
Was it the producer, studio, director, or writer who chose the title, or a collaboration? What is typical?
I know in some cases the title is changed after marketing tests reveal problems. For example, the Bond film Licence to Kill was originally called Licence Revoked, which corresponded to 007 losing his authorization to kill. The problem was that research found that something like 50% of the public didn't know what the word "revoked" means, so it was changed to the universally known "kill." (At least they kept the British spelling of Licence.)
[Edited last by Brian Perry on August 21, 2001 at 10:51 AM]