Directors What level of studio revisionism are you in favor of for blu-ray?

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Mark-P, Jan 13, 2011.

  1. Mark-P

    Mark-P Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,031
    Likes Received:
    897
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    I've created a poll to see how much studio tampering forum members are comfortable with. You can check as many answers as you like.
     
  2. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,513
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    I don't think major revisions by a studio should happen. However, a studio should work to restore original color, quality and remove damage done to the content by all means. The first time I saw "Vertigo" as remastered, I was amazed at how good it looked in comparison to versions prior to DVD. I think the idea is: how did people originally see it or how was it intended... because that isn't really a revision as more of a correction to the way it was originally intended.
     
  3. Mark-P

    Mark-P Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,031
    Likes Received:
    897
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    I don't consider fixing print damage or wear as revisionism. However, removing natural artifacts that were part of the original presentation, such as film-grain, is. I'm not making a judgment about these revisions, just asking how far should the studio go?
     
  4. RobertR

    RobertR Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 1998
    Messages:
    9,690
    Likes Received:
    159
    The goal should be to reproduce the look of the original film as closely as possible, including grain.
     

Share This Page