Chuck Anstey
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Nov 10, 1998
- Messages
- 1,640
- Real Name
- Chuck Anstey
I think you have your dates mixed up because DVD hasn't been around as long as you seem to think it has. DVD players were not into enough consumer's homes until 2002-2003 time frame that it became a truly viable rental format equal to VHS. Then video stores were switching to only DVD almost overnight. DVD has only been the primary rental format for the last 7 or so years. The sell-through market has impacted rentals but the whole point of the article was sell-through is falling so Warner is resorting to tricks to try to increase sales. I think that as a group, consumers have decided to buy less movies or simply buy cheap $5 movies and they'll rent the new releases. Maybe people are just sharing DVDs more than before.Originally Posted by Jon Martin
Face it, the DVD rental industry has been lucky to be able to stick around for the past decade. People were so used to renting VHS that they stayed with the practice even though DVDs only cost a small percentage of what a VHS did.
If the studios kill off the rental market by eliminating revenue sharing or put a delay in renting, then we will just be back to where video rental started; Mom and Pop buy the movies for sell-through prices and rent them out. This is what NetFlix did until this deal with Warner. There will always be a demand for renting movies on current physical media until an On-Demand system with high quality is in place that has a tremendous catalog of titles. NetFlix is trying to do this but they have a ways to go. At that time we will be right back to renting but in a different form.
I guess I am lucky to have a Hastings in town that rents movies. One problem I had with the place was they charge a $2 premium for Blu-ray rentals. So I went to the nearby BB, which I haven't been into in 6 years to see their selection of Blu and how much they charge. BB doesn't charge a premium. Of course their rental fee was more than Hastings charges for Blu-ray if you bring the movie back the next day for a $2 credit. So it wasn't that Hastings was charging too much for Blu, it was they were renting their DVDs really cheap.