Warner Archive Launches Streaming Service

Discussion in 'Streaming and Digital Media' started by Bob Cashill, Feb 1, 2013.

  1. Bob Cashill

    Bob Cashill Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2001
    Messages:
    2,884
    Likes Received:
    533
    In beta and on Roku at the moment. What do we think? (Moderator please post in the Archive Announcement thread if more appropriate.) http://criterioncast.com/news/warner-archive-collection-launches-streaming-service/
     
  2. Brandon Conway

    Brandon Conway captveg

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    8,340
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Location:
    North Hollywood, CA
    Real Name:
    Brandon Conway
    Dozens and dozens of the archive films are titles I want to see but I do not want to blind buy. If they do a PS3 version I'm in.
     
  3. MLamarre

    MLamarre Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2008
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    37
    Real Name:
    Matthew Lamarre
    I really like the idea and I'm looking forward to trying it, but there are so few WAC titles listed on the website...the majority are films released by WHV on pressed disc years ago. I can't help but think that they probably feel if they stream too many WAC films it will hurt their disc sales... Also interesting to note that they're streaming RUN OF THE ARROW and UNTIL THE END OF THE WORLD, two films that haven't been released on disc at all by either WHV or WAC.
     
  4. studioexexs

    studioexexs Auditioning

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2013
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    STREAMING SUCKS - THE CONSUMER not a cloud company should be in control - and with streaming the consumer is never in control
     
  5. JoHud

    JoHud Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,193
    Likes Received:
    495
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak
    I agree that it is currently nothing I'm going to go out of my way for presently since most of these are older home video transfers and hardly any of them cover current WAC titles. It's still Beta though so it's still possible the selection will improve. However, I agree with Mr. Lammarre that this service will likely be designed not to cut into the profits of their MOD product very much.
    I'm sure those, along with Blonde Crazy, are the same transfers that air on TCM presently as the WAC intents to remaster them in the future for home video. A recent Facebook response from one of their representatives stated that the existing video transfer for Blonde Crazy is over 25 years old. Run of the Arrow is also in serious need of remastering and I wouldn't doubt the current transfer is non-anamorphic.
     
  6. David Weicker

    David Weicker Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,337
    Likes Received:
    613
    Real Name:
    David
    There are a few of their rarer titles - TV pilots or series - that I wouldn't mind streaming. Or some of the titles that aren't likely to show up on a cable channel. But I'm with Brandon, there are titles I kind of remember (from my youth), that I would prefer to see again before purchasing. As for cutting into their profits, if they did a 'rent to own' model, where you get a discount on a previously streamed title, that might encourage some additional sales. David
     
  7. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,419
    Likes Received:
    179
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    This is the greatest thing and something I predicted in one of the other threads about these titles. I will continue to buy the multi-set shorts but now with the streaming it will give me a reason to not wait until they turn up on TCM. Great job and it's something I will certainly support. Some Warner Archive titles are already up on Amazon. I just updated my Roku to the top-end model last week so this is perfect timing.
     
  8. mdnitoil

    mdnitoil Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    22
    Real Name:
    Scott
    It'll be fascinating to see how this plays out. If ever there was a group hostile towards streaming, it's the middle-aged and up classic movie collectors. I'm not sure how much interest I have at the moment. Like many here, I prefer a little more control over my viewing options.
     
  9. DeWilson

    DeWilson Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes Received:
    145
    Real Name:
    Denny
    A rose by any other name... it's just TCM on Demand for Roku! :D
     
  10. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,231
    Likes Received:
    4,614
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    They're on iTunes too.
     
  11. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,419
    Likes Received:
    179
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    This is certainly true to a point but I've seen quite a few classic movies on the big screen over the past few years and it's about 50/50 on the young and old. I really do think TCM and DVD helped get some classic films into the hands of younger people. Fans of Tarantino have gone back and gotten involved with the films that he recommends and I think people like Scorsese has a strong following among young people and they will check out movies he talks about. What's hard is getting young people to drop $15-$20 on a DVD-R from a website they might not know about. I really do think streaming is yet another way to introduce these films to younger people. Like it or not, streaming is what younger people are doing. Be it on a Roku or their phone. I signed up and I hope to get an invite to try this out. If not, I'd gladly pay $15-$20 a month to stream some titles as long as they aren't just things that were given an official release on DVD. I would prefer a pay-per-view type thing with them just charging $2 or $3 a title. Either way, I'm certainly very happy that they've taken this step and hopefully the other studios would follow. I mentioned in the Columbia/Karloff thread that there are so many VERY SMALL titles that big stars did that just wouldn't really be big enough sellers for even a made on demand release. This would be a great way to put them out there for people to see. Incomplete films, outtakes, shorts and so on.
     
  12. Camps

    Camps Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2010
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    36
    Real Name:
    Tom
    Thanks for the heads-up, Bob.
     
  13. Louis Letizia

    Louis Letizia Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2000
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    18
    Interested in seeing how UNTIL THE END OF THE WORLD looks in HD. a bLURAY SOON?
     
  14. Brandon Conway

    Brandon Conway captveg

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    8,340
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Location:
    North Hollywood, CA
    Real Name:
    Brandon Conway
    I partially agree. Streaming as a replacement of owning personal copies sucks. However, streaming as an option in the rental market is excellent. Between Netflix and Amazon I've been able to see plenty of films that have quality DVD or Blu-ray releases without hassle, and discovered ones I enjoyed enough to then purchase.
     
  15. Camps

    Camps Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2010
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    36
    Real Name:
    Tom
    Here's a pretty informative article: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/60707
     
  16. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,419
    Likes Received:
    179
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    People who say it sucks: You do realize that you have an option to buy that stream and if you do then a cloud or the boogeyman aren't going to take it from you? It's not like they're burning every copy of GONE WITH THE WIND and if you want to see it you must wait for them to stream it once a year. It's an alternative. I'm not going to jump on the doom and gloom fight but I think everyone should go out and buy a Roku. :) A lot of companies (including Something Weird, Sinister Cinema) are still selling DVD-Rs at $11-$15 while offering a cheaper stream for around $10. Sinister Cinema (through Amazon) even allows you to rent a movie (through streaming) at $2 or just buy it at $7. This is something that's really good because they deal with movies that most people aren't going to watch but it works because you can "try" a movie for $2 and if you then like it and want to own it you can have it for $7. Still under $10, which is a lot cheaper than taking a blind buy on a DVD-R. I'm not sure if this new site is just going to allow streaming or if down the road they will just make every movie available to buy as well. $15 DVD-R. $10 Stream $3 Rental I think everyone is taken care of and it seems like it would have more money going into Warner's pocket. .
     
  17. JoHud

    JoHud Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,193
    Likes Received:
    495
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak
    So far, it seems clear that latter day WAC titles that were remastered in 2k will not be presented in HD (Mexican Spitfire, Texas Lawmen, etc). However, with many films released by WHV that have not made it to blu-ray are presented in HD and for that along, a rental plan will probably be worth it. By far the biggest treat is the inclusion of Wim Wender's Until The End Of The World in HD, a film that never even made it to DVD in North America. Close behind it is the long OOP The Loved Ones being presented in HD.
     
  18. Bob Cashill

    Bob Cashill Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2001
    Messages:
    2,884
    Likes Received:
    533
    I wonder if this HD streaming will affect the Archve's Blu-ray plans...still waiting for additional titles in the format.
     
  19. Roger Rollins

    Roger Rollins Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2001
    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    0
    I
    In actuality, the circumstances are not exactly as you perceive. One of WB archives' earliest 'remastered' titles ( from the era of the red banded header on the packagng) was the Mnogram noir "Violence" ( Great little gem BTW) and that title is in their private beta in HD. Mexican Spitfire and the monogram set with "Texas Lawmen" were not marketed as remastered releases, and likely used newer SD sources. I would venture to guess that there will be many more of the WAC- initiated HD remasters as time goes on included in thie new service as it officialy launches. Eiher way, with such a stellar array of great films and unique rarities ( especially the cool and ultra-rare TV stuff they have which you can't see anywhere else), this service is a must for me, especially if is reasonably priced!
     
  20. Joe Karlosi

    Joe Karlosi Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,004
    Likes Received:
    18
    I agree with this. I am basically AGAINST streaming as far as OWNING is concerned. If there's a movie I like that I want to add to my own personal library, then I wish to have it physically on a commercially released disc -- and with packaging and artwork to compliment it (even if it's a MOD release, though of course I prefer PRESSED discs). Those who support streaming better start realizing that there is every likelihood that one day their viewing choices will be dictated by the studios, and they will decide what is available on their menu for you to watch, only for whatever length of time they decide it will be available to you. Streaming completely gives them the reigns with which to control you and your viewing options. But once you own a physical disc, it's yours to do with as you please forever -- as long as you are able to have the electronics to play them on (store a couple of extra players and HDTVs if you like). Having said that, RENTALS are another matter entirely. I am presently not hooked up for streaming because there are not many times I think of films I would like to sample before deciding whether or not they're worth owning. If I wanted to watch more first-time films, then I think streaming is preferable to going to a rental store like BLOCKBUSTER and having to borrow a disc and then go back and return it. For example, although I generally dislike modern remakes of older films, I am interested in seeing the redux of THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT (I thought Wes Craven's original was a terrible movie). If I had streaming, then I could just press the button and have it delivered straight to my screen. That would be fine --- but if I decided I wanted to OWN the film, then I want a physical DVD or Blu-ray; not some cloud or link or file, or whatever the heck it is.
     

Share This Page