What's new

"THX 1138: The George Lucas Director's Cut" to Street 09/14/04 (1 Viewer)

Galen_V

Second Unit
Joined
Apr 12, 2003
Messages
352
I'm surprised no one picked up on this yet, but this comes from the Warner Brothers HV special advertising section in this week's NY Times Magazine:




Edit: Added Image
 

Dane Marvin

Screenwriter
Joined
Jul 21, 2003
Messages
1,490
Wow! Chalk up another title for the 2-disc SE series. That came from out of nowhere considering it's less than a month away. The extras sound great. :emoji_thumbsup:
 

Kevin M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2000
Messages
5,172
Real Name
Kevin Ray
...yeah..that's..original....anyway, it includes the student film? Right on! I'll be snapping this up immediately upon release.
 

Seth Paxton

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 5, 1998
Messages
7,585
Great news, finally. I'm all for director cuts and whatnot, but GL does have an ugly record with such things lately. Hopefully we will still get basically the same film, perhaps with branching or something.

It's an outstanding film and I would hate to think that he had any real reason to "fix" it.

The package as a whole sounds very promising. :emoji_thumbsup:
 

John Alderson

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 8, 2001
Messages
564
Hmm, he's including his student film? Maybe he'll consider the '77 release of Star Wars to be a student film :D
 

Adam_ME

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 31, 2002
Messages
930
I've never seen THX-1138 and was looking forward to getting the DVD. I just hope Lucas doesn't alter the movie too much from its original state. And definitely don't "upgrade" it with CGI!!!
 

Matt Stone

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2000
Messages
9,063
Real Name
Matt Stone
I'll definitely be picking this up. Hopefully Lucas didn't change too much.
 

Robert Anthony

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2003
Messages
3,218
The only reason this is being called a "Director's Cut" is because Warners took the film away from him after he finished it and cut it to their specifications, without his input. It's one of the reasons Coppola and Lucas ended up getting estranged through some of the 70's and 80's: Coppola produced it, and Lucas thought Coppola should have been able to prevent the studio taking away his movie and making cuts without his input. The famous quote of his was "It's like the doctors taking away your children and then cutting off a couple fingers here and there to make it look better." or something along those lines.

This is a "Director's Cut" in that he's probably simply putting back the footage that was initially chopped by the execs at WB. The version we've all been watching was a studio edit without notes or input from either Coppola or Lucas. Although rumor is there WAS a video release, on VHS, that had Lucas original version intact.

But that's not as fun or interesting or worrisome to speculate about as assuming he's going to Special Edition it with Jar jar and walkie talkies and people shooting first ha ha ha Where do I stick a dollar $ign in ha ha ha childhood rape. ;)
 

Mark_TS

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,704
Oddly, MAY 4th is a Tuesday-which to my hazy brain, was roughly around the time I though it was going to come out...but im all for an early release if true. re: 4/6!
 

Chris PC

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 12, 2001
Messages
3,975
Looking forward to this. Hopefully the version is a good one in that material is added and not so much removed or aftered. I can't recall seeing the entire film though anyways. Cool movie.
 

Adam_S

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2001
Messages
6,316
Real Name
Adam_S
this is probably the cut that was rereleased after American Grafitti (and or star wars) hit big (not sure which one created the impetus for it). basically Lucas was able to go back and restore the six minutes of studio excised footage, and I believe this is the cut released on home video previously.
 

Robert Anthony

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2003
Messages
3,218
There it is. Thanks, Adam, I KNEW the original cut ended up making it to video somewhere, but I didn't know the specifics.

and thanks, Kevin, for the link to the other thread. I knew as I was typing my response that I'd typed something similar here before ;)
 

David_Blackwell

Screenwriter
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
1,443
The date is a mistake. Someone printed the wrong date or they were sent the wrong date without anyone checking the details.

Be Seeing you,
david Blackwell
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,997
Messages
5,128,019
Members
144,227
Latest member
maanw2357
Recent bookmarks
0
Top