Winston T. Boogie
Senior HTF Member
I did not see Seth Rogen do his Green Hornet thing but I mean these are not serious characters and it's all just cartoonish fiction so I don't see any problem in tinkering with these characters from version to version. I thought Adam West was the definitive Batman because he got exactly how goofy a guy running around fighting crime dressed like a bat is. Adam West destroys Christian Bale's Batman...which honestly is a train wreck of epic proportions.
The Lone Ranger is not a "serious" character so I don't really think there is anything wrong with how he is played in Verbinski's film. He also is not "The Lone Ranger" for most of the film because the film is about how he came to be "The Lone Ranger."
Tonto is the one telling the tale and so we are basically seeing the Lone Ranger and the story through his eyes/memory. I liked this idea and yes, it was a tribute to Little Big Man. Verbinski's film is celebrating things he loves about westerns and movies in general. I think that makes it a very fun film if you also like westerns and older films. Honestly, I'm not a fan of Disney films generally. I don't go to see much that comes out of the House of the Mouse. I have to say The Lone Ranger was not a very Disney film in my opinion as it is pretty violent, features hookers, a whore house, open fetishistic sexual behavior, cannibalism, genocide, a rather large dose of that Spaghetti Western nihilism, and a general nasty streak. All this and threw in some political and social messages as well. Which I thought really made the film interesting. It also made me wonder who the film was supposed to be aimed at and if Disney knew what they got themselves into. The only other Disney film I can recall getting so weird (and it was mainly at the end) was The Black Hole.
Personally, I thought it was a far better film than all the super hero/giant robot/this movie is one long product placement garbage that passes for summer entertainment...but that's just me.
The Lone Ranger is not a "serious" character so I don't really think there is anything wrong with how he is played in Verbinski's film. He also is not "The Lone Ranger" for most of the film because the film is about how he came to be "The Lone Ranger."
Tonto is the one telling the tale and so we are basically seeing the Lone Ranger and the story through his eyes/memory. I liked this idea and yes, it was a tribute to Little Big Man. Verbinski's film is celebrating things he loves about westerns and movies in general. I think that makes it a very fun film if you also like westerns and older films. Honestly, I'm not a fan of Disney films generally. I don't go to see much that comes out of the House of the Mouse. I have to say The Lone Ranger was not a very Disney film in my opinion as it is pretty violent, features hookers, a whore house, open fetishistic sexual behavior, cannibalism, genocide, a rather large dose of that Spaghetti Western nihilism, and a general nasty streak. All this and threw in some political and social messages as well. Which I thought really made the film interesting. It also made me wonder who the film was supposed to be aimed at and if Disney knew what they got themselves into. The only other Disney film I can recall getting so weird (and it was mainly at the end) was The Black Hole.
Personally, I thought it was a far better film than all the super hero/giant robot/this movie is one long product placement garbage that passes for summer entertainment...but that's just me.