Quentin
Senior HTF Member
It was a really great episode. They have a stupendous cast.
Yeah, they do. I've seen a number of the actors in smaller roles but this is the first time I'm seeing any of them in a large part (I know Keri Russell was on Felcitiy but I've never seen it) and I'm really impressed with all of them. It's way too early to say this but I wouldn't be surprised if Russell gets an Emmy nomination this year.Quentin said:They have a stupendous cast.
Who said they didn't do OK with that? There's plenty of successful shows that focus on the bad guy. What I meant was that when you have a show focusing on an anti-hero, you usually see that the bad guy is also funny or charismatic or has some buddies or something else that makes them relatable. After two episodes (when I wrote that), we still have yet to see much of a pleasant or human side of these characters. About the only likable or relatable thing you can see is that they love their kids and even then, their mission puts their kids in serious danger. Outside of their family, Elizabeth and Phillip are very much about business and are dangerous people.DaveF said:And rooting for the bad guys? The Sopranos. I hear HBO did ok with that series about terrible people doing awful things.
Only a year before, in 1980, was the "Miracle on Ice" so I'd say it wouldn't be all that uncommon.DaveF said:I was wondering if that would be a red flag for the FBI agent. Were suburban D.C. kids playing hockey in 1981?
Hockey had nowhere near the penetration into non-traditional markets as it does today, even taking into account the effects the Olympics may have had. Even at the height of the Ovechkin era, hockey wasn''t anywhere near as popular in Washington as say Moscow or Calgary in 1981. The scene in question even had Stan noting that he plays baseball, football, and racquetball, with the obvious message of "you know, American sports."Originally Posted by Joe_H
Only a year before, in 1980, was the "Miracle on Ice" so I'd say it wouldn't be all that uncommon.
I'm guessing no. He did seem to genuinely want to save his friend's (colleague, really) wife, and exfiltrating an adult woman is a lot harder than just a baby, so if he was happy with the idea that she might simply be executed, he would have done it himself. At least that's my take on it.Originally Posted by ScottH
Well, those looking for some sort of empathy from the Phillip character got it in the third episode. I have to wonder though if Phillip knew the wife was toast when they handed her off.
Maybe he'll try it, and they'll passOriginally Posted by Quentin
Also, they keep showing us him studying his Russian. PLEASE don't try to pull the old off-the-cuff Russian question drop to try and catch Phil or Liz in a response. That's too easy.