Last night I saw THE AMAZING SPIDERMAN 2 on our local Imax screen. Although it was shown on the world's largest cinema screen, the picture only covered 2/3 of the full size screen . Had it been projected on 70mm film the quality would have been fantastic and it would have covered the full screen..Sadly it was digital and the quality was dismal. Why do they show digital films on imax screens? It may be on okay on those miniature sized Imax screens that they have in cinema complexes , but on the world's largest screen it is an abomination..We both thought it was the very worst film seen that we had seen in the last 12 months. No reviews of the film were available in the press or on television before it opened. That was a clear sign that the film would not live up to expectations. The film was in 3-D but you would not have known as the film cut from one scene to the next with the speed of a concord, so you had little chance to take in most of the action. The performances of the cast was generally good, with the exception of some overacting by the villain in the finale. The fault must lie with the scriptwriters and director as the film was very overlong at almost 2 1/2 hours. Much wasted and unnecessary material should have been left on the cutting room floor. Judging by the number of inconsiderate morons texting during the film, they must have been as bored as we were. I am a great fan of the SPIDERMAN films and the first AMAZING SPIDERMAN film but THE AMAZING SPIDERMAN 2 sucked big time Spoiler There was no emotional feeling when one of the main characters died You never cared when you should have. Everything was full on. If you suffer from insomnia then seeing this film will send you to sleep very quickly. It was a most tedious experience from the very beginning right through to the finale.