I liken it to a movie you can take a 45 minute nap in the middle, and miss nothing.
21:9 does not equal 2.35:1 anyway as you still have tiny horizontal black bars. It's just a shame that 21:9 means missing out on picture info on a lot of great movies like 'Lawrence Of Arabia' and other Super Panavision 70 flicks.Mark-P said:Taking DVD Beaver's 1080 X 1920 screen capture and cropping out the black pixels you are left with 872 X 1920, thus an AR of 2.20183486, so Matt had it right on the nose.
You know you don't have to watch it in zoom mode. You can watch it in the same setting you use for 1.85:1 movies, with bars on all sides.Blu_rayfan66 said:21:9 does not equal 2.35:1 anyway as you still have tiny horizontal black bars. It's just a shame that 21:9 means missing out on picture info on a lot of great movies like 'Lawrence Of Arabia' and other Super Panavision 70 flicks.
Congrats. Same thing with me, except mine's slated for an early Monday deliveryRichard Gallagher said:I pre-ordered it during the FoxConnect sale for $8. It and some other titles shipped yesterday and they are due here on Tuesday.
ha ha I would need to use my binoculars tho as the image would be so small on the screen! I love 21:9 displays but plan to switch back to 16:9 next time thoMark-P said:You know you don't have to watch it in zoom mode. You can watch it in the same setting you use for 1.85:1 movies, with bars on all sides.
I concur, what a great looking BD.Dr Griffin said:The flickering mentioned in the review where Michelangelo is explaining his inspiration to the pope up on the scaffolding, you must note there is a candle in the foreground - I think this was a deliberate effect to highlight the intimacy of this candlelit scene. This is a fantastic transfer. If only all catalog titles could look this good.
I agree completely, which is why I'm baffled by some folks saying there's DNR and waxy faces. I just must be blind.Robert Crawford said:I concur, what a great looking BD.
Andrew Budgell said:The Blu-ray is breathtaking.
Wow. Couldn't agree more.ahollis said:One word for this release Gorgeous.
Quoting myself here from the other forum about TAATE: Its master has been prepared by the very same company that brought us the first Patton so it is expected that it will look at least a bit funny and grainless - this is something HTV/Illuminate prided themselves in back in 2009, to quote:ROclockCK said:Let me guess where those "DNR" and "waxy faces" comments are coming from...
Has Fox had anything to say about the harvest for this release? My TAATE Blu-ray hasn't arrived yet, but just based on those Beaver caps, it looks to me like a pretty recent job and 4k source. Huge improvement in resolution over the DVD.
Not much of a difference to a b&w digicam on caps like these:Nick*Z said:In some cases DNR is warranted and actually benefits a movie's presentation on home video; as when Universal 'tweaked' the in-camera zooms in To Kill A Mockingbird to Ibring the level of grain in line with the rest of the image quality; merely 'evening out' the consistency while neither obliterating nor softening the quality of the image itself. This is precisely why DNR was created. Tragically, someone along the way thought of it as a grain elimination tool; transforming film images into something that looked as though it was shot with a high resolution digicam instead.
When I saw this picture in TODD-AO, I was so impressed by the prologue that everything went downhill from there. Not saying that the movie is not worth a shot, but the prologue stands on its own, and the works of art speak for themselves, and they are awe inspiring.
Rex Harrison is very entertaining as well, as is the obfuscation of the artist's sexuality via Diane Cilento's character. Quite amusing.
Don't shy away from this release.