Winston T. Boogie
Senior HTF Member
Ha...oops...I gave myself away!
Nope. I just want this format to be healthy enough for catalogue producers...offering reasonable rewards for everyone's investment and hard work throughout the chain...so they will have some incentive to deliver even more great stuff.Jari K said:By reading these discussions (and some comments from TT) I actually believe that some of you kinda like the idea where BD collecting becomes a "elitist" hobby. Expensive, limited edition releases where the A/V quality is back on the spotlight. No more useless extras or "junk". Just a classic film and a class of good wine. You've a "beer budget"? Go buy Death Wish 5 and a case of Pabst Blue Ribbon.
Oops . I spotted the "wink" so I think you're right so I withdraw my earlier comment .TravisR said:I'm pretty sure that John was making a joke.
How much for ?bgart13 said:To show I'm not such a TT Scrooge, I just bought MAN IN THE DARK. However, it was from eBay and comes with the DIAL M FOR MURDER bd too.
Yes, but the difference is, the people who sing the praises actually BUY the discs. Many (or most) who whine, do not buy the discs. You'd think they just ignore it, but they don't. It's like people who complain about a TV show they never watch. I don't understand why they care.bgart13 said:You mean like Mill Creek's excellent double feature of MR. SARDONICUS and BROTHERHOOD OF SATAN? Okedoke!Re: my purchase... 44.99 for the two titles. I've thought about that UK Hitchcock set before but never pulled the trigger.Re: the constant whining? I'd say it's about 50/50 to the constant songs of TT praise. Half love 'em, half don't. Such is life.
Couldn't have said it better myself. If Titus is any indication, I think this is pretty much what the future holds for other relatively obscure but quality catalog titles that did little at the box office - getting released at a somewhat premium price by a niche label using an old, unrestored, imperfect transfer. Sort of like in the early days of DVD, before the concept of restoring/remastering transfers became commonplace (like that very first nonanamorphic DVD of Blade Runner). The film's studio is more than likely not going to bother investing in a new transfer or restoration, and the niche label is not going to have the deep pockets or the technical expertise to do a new transfer. So we'll have to make do with what we get and scale down our expectations. Which I will happily do if it means obscure catalog titles have a future on blu-ray. I've read the interviews with Nick Redman and what he says about the catalog side of home video is pretty sobering - it doesn't sound at all like anyone is getting rich doing catalog titles anymore.Mark Cappelletty said:What gets me is the constant whining. If you don't like Twilight Time's business model, then by all means, DON'T BUY FROM THEM. My limited dealings with Nick have shown him to be a gentleman and one who's devoted to making Twilight Time work. Do I wish the titles were cheaper? Sure. Does the 3,000-copy limit aggravate me occasionally (such as when SAE's website crashes)? Yep. But, as someone who scrimped and saved to buy laserdiscs back when he was a poor-ass grad student, I'm wiling to put up with the limitations to get quality product put out by people who care about what they're doing. If you want cheap titles thrown together seemingly at random, by all means enjoy the Mill Creek/Echo Bridge bargain packs.
I think the point Mark makes with regards to poor students and Laserdiscs is quite clear. If you really want a movie, especially a niche title released on a niche format by a decent company, you'll find the money to buy it, instead of demanding that all Blu-rays reach some unrealistically low price point that you have arbitrarily set for yourself.As Steve says, it's about returning some sustainability to the market. That's what it has to do with BDs. You're right, it's 2014, and unlike the Laserdisc days where we were about to head to the bright future for catalog titles that DVD promised, and fulfilled to a large extent, we're now on the downslope of the post-DVD death-of-physical-media era, where the catalog market is obviously much more fragile, and needs a better mindset from movie fans than "I'll buy it when it hits $5".Jari K said:"But, as someone who scrimped and saved to buy laserdiscs back when he was a poor-ass grad student, I'm wiling to put up with the limitations to get quality product put out by people who care about what they're doing."Oh, the good old laserdisc times, poor students and all. And how does this affect on the BD business today? It's great to reminisce, but it's 2014 guys.And if it's not TT, it's got to be Mill Creek or Echo Bridge? Oh well.
You keep inventing these arguments to shoot down, don't you? Did someone say "5$"?Persianimmortal said:...instead of demanding that all Blu-rays reach some unrealistically low price point that you have arbitrarily set for yourself.
...and needs a better mindset from movie fans than "I'll buy it when it hits $5".
Why? Are they unhappy with their current success?Jari K said:TT should:
a) Lower the prices.
b) Sell their releases in a places like Amazon.com.
+ c) Perhaps make another batch of the titles that are selling out. Since there's some, you know, demand.
I care because for every movie that TT gets, it's another movie that's not going to get released at a reasonable price point. There are very few movies that I would pay $35 for (that's with shipping), but many more that I would pay $20 for. There are thousands of movies out on Blu-ray and many many of them are great movies. I can't own all that I want, so the ones that get bought are those which represent a good value proposition, relatively speaking. For example, Criterion usually has better movies and I can pick those up on sale for $20.JohnMor said:Yes, but the difference is, the people who sing the praises actually BUY the discs. Many (or most) who whine, do not buy the discs. You'd think they just ignore it, but they don't. It's like people who complain about a TV show they never watch. I don't understand why they care.
How so? If the studios saw these as viable releases on their own, they would have released them instead of licensing them out to TT. Or they'll release them once the 3-year deal with TT is done.bruceames said:I care because for every movie that TT gets, it's another movie that's not going to get released at a reasonable price point.
...
Criterion usually has better movies and I can pick those up on sale for $20.
No, I would venture to say that most, if not all, are just like me: they buy them because they want that film on blu-ray. We love the particular film; collectability has nothing to do with it.bruceames said:From reading posts from TT fans, I get the feeling that they buy many of their titles just because they know that the price will never depreciate or will never be on sale, because TT controls the price point through exclusive sales on their web site. They probably hope they sell out and become collectors items. I'm sure that "limited to 3000" sells quite a few copies alone.