"Star Trek XII Movie Sequel" Discussion Thread

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Norm, Jul 5, 2009.

  1. Norm

    Norm Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 1998
    Messages:
    2,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Norm
    [SIZE= larger]With all this Media created hype about Khan. I think this "Star Trek : Alternate Reality " needs to establish the Klingon's. Even if its not for the full movie. I would like to see the Klingon Empire vs. the Federation. I would like to see the same evil cunning Klingon's like in TOS instead of TNG cavemen barbarian Klingons. That IMO that never would have made it into space. And yes have them keep the pronounced ridges like in ST:TMP. Any thoughts on what you would like to see done with the sequel?[/SIZE]
     
  2. PaulDA

    PaulDA Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,693
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    St. Hubert, Quebec, Canada
    Real Name:
    Paul
    NO Khan, for starters. I'd actually like to see them "explore strange new worlds, seek out new life and new civilizations" etc. I also don't really care if there are Klingons or not.

    The whole point of creating a new alternate timeline, I would think, was to allow us to see something, well, NEW.
     
  3. Nelson Au

    Nelson Au Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 1999
    Messages:
    12,568
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    You beat me to it for posting about this topic!

    Yes, I thought the point of this alternate reality was so they could pursue new stories. If they did a straight restart with new actors doing Kirk and Spock in the Prime Universe, then we'd know what was going to happen, the Organians, the Gorn incident, Balok, Nancy Crater, Trelane, Commander Kor, The Doomsday Machine, etc...

    Though, a redo of The Doomsday Machine would make for an exciting movie. No villian, battle action, etc. Classic Kirk outwitting a computer essentially.
     
  4. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,515
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    Can't do Kahn, because you'd really be doing "Space Seed" way before WOK, and so it wouldn't have the same impact.


    I don't know about that. I can't remember TNG, but one of the big plots of DS9 was that there were numerous klingons who were smart, crafty warriors.. but those who fought their battles politically and with dishonesty had pretty much taken over the empire by out-maneuvering them. There were some great episodes where they were shown up, however..
    There are certain things I don't want to see, because I think they would bring nothing to the movie and pollute the series at the same time. Those items are:
    * No Q. Q would be aware of the alternate reality, and as such, the whole thing would be crap.

    * Let's leave out old Spock from the main timeline, his involvement would also screw things up.

    * Avoid time travel as much as possible.. preferrably, none.

    * No Khan, as above.. it just wouldn't make sense.

    I do like the idea of the doomsday machine, that's an interesting one, potentially. but I don't know how you'd lenthen it out to feature film length. Klingons are a likely good subject. Romulans are now basically gone. So, the Romulan-Klingon war that held Klingons occupied for some time, and at least in DS9 mythos may have involved Cardassians did not happen. That could be interesting.

    Gorn are also interesting potential enemies.

    I think they are better off if they mix it up and use lots of completely different situations fans have no knowledge of at all, in the end.. some alien we've almost never seen or had very small mention. Tholians, anyone?
     
  5. David Forbes

    David Forbes Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 1999
    Messages:
    621
    Likes Received:
    0
    Romulans are not gone at all. Romulus is destroyed in the future of the new timeline (assuming the event still occurs). Romulus and Romulans are alive and well in the new Kirk-era timeline. However, that doesn't mean they should use Romulans as the villains again. I don't think they should go back to that particular well again.
     
  6. Chris Atkins

    Chris Atkins Producer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,887
    Likes Received:
    0
    I vote for more Tholians and Gorn. If they have to have a "major" adversary, make it the Romulans. The Klingons held this role in the original timeline and are pretty tired by now. The Romulans never really got much screen time (with the exception of TNG) and I would love to see them get more.
     
  7. Norm

    Norm Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 1998
    Messages:
    2,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Norm
    I think O& K are thinking in terms of re-inventing everything. Which is fine in some cases. But I think most fans don't want to see retreads like a reimaged TWOK part 2.
     
  8. Joseph Bolus

    Joseph Bolus Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 1999
    Messages:
    2,412
    Likes Received:
    143
    We *definitely* do not need a rethread of Khan at this point.

    Instead, I would *love* to see a re-imagined "Errand of Mercy" - but this time with the full Federation/Klingon space battle prior to the Organians' intervention.

    In general, just about any story from TOS's first year -- with the exception of "Space Seed" and/or "City on the Edge of Forever" -- is ripe for "re-imagining".
     
  9. Norm

    Norm Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 1998
    Messages:
    2,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Norm
    My only problem with a Doomsday Machine movie at this point is the fact that its too much like V'ger & the Whale Ship in IV. I think an expanded Gorn movie would make a good second movie. But I think a new threat or situation on another world might be cool. Maybe a Galileo 7 mixed with another episode or story. But the more I think about it the more they need to explore new territory.
     
  10. Mark Leiter

    Mark Leiter Second Unit

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 1999
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am not saying I would want to see a re-tread of Khan. But why couldn't there be a new Space Seed story told. The time line was not altered until after the Bontany Bay was launched (1996). Presumably the craft is still out there lost in space waiting for some fool to discover it.

    I could seee a story where Khan's ship is discovered, but not by the Enterprise. He succeeds in taking over that ship and then makes back to Earth or the Mars Colony and then proceeds to start a revolution. I can see that type of story being very plausible and have to potential to make very intertesting movie.

    Of course in that senerio they really couldn't call it "Space Seed" could they. :)
     
  11. Gary Seven

    Gary Seven Grand Poo Pah

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    160
    Location:
    Lake Worth, Florida
    Real Name:
    Gaston
    I just want a quality science fiction story that presents food for thought... along the lines of WNMHGB, Taste Of Armegeddon, Devil in the Dark, etc.
     
  12. PaulDA

    PaulDA Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,693
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    St. Hubert, Quebec, Canada
    Real Name:
    Paul
    I concur--I just don't want a remake of any of those.
     
  13. Nelson Au

    Nelson Au Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 1999
    Messages:
    12,568
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    It occurred to me that the original premise of Star Trek was partly inspired by the Horatio Hornblower books. I've never read them, but I wonder if Orci and Kurtzman ever did.

    I have a sense they have not read them, they seem to be more interested in reading the novelizations of Star Trek that have come out over the years. It seems to me they need to broaden their influences. Why stay stuck in the Star Trek world. I can see inspiration striking from the classics outside. It worked for Roddenberry and Nic Meyer. Those Hornblower stories sound like terrific adventure stories. I imagine one of them could be inspiring, and could apply to the kind of current social/political world and events we live in now. Stuff like oppression of peoples, or the ecology, or some kind of issue that involves the Prime Directive.

    It's too bad that Orci and Kurtzman don't read the HTF. At least I am guessing they don't. I think we have a pretty large, not huge, group of members here that are Star Trek fans. I think we can discuss this in a more mature and civilized way then at Trekmovie where I know Orci and Kurtzman lurk and comment. It would be cool if they had some exposure here! Of course there are a lot of sites that have similar discussions we have about our favorite films/TV shows that they cannot possibly have the time to read.
     
  14. Brandon Conway

    Brandon Conway captveg

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    8,476
    Likes Received:
    1,208
    Location:
    North Hollywood, CA
    Real Name:
    Brandon Conway
    I say go with the Orion Syndicate as the primary antagonists.
     
  15. Lou Sytsma

    Lou Sytsma Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 1998
    Messages:
    5,833
    Likes Received:
    337
    Real Name:
    Lou Sytsma
    A clean slate has been set up. Use it. Do something new and original.
     
  16. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,657
    Likes Received:
    3,822
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    Given the movie's success and the talent involved, I think you're going to see just that.
     
  17. Nelson Au

    Nelson Au Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 1999
    Messages:
    12,568
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Travis- I am not convinced yet. The new film was good and I did enjoy it. JJ Abrams did a great job. But there were a few things that I had issues with and I understand why they were done. So I can accept them.

    But I fear a Quantum of Solace. Casino Royale was greeted with much praise. But the next rebooted Bond, QoS was less so.

    The writers have a tough job. They have to appeal to a mainstream audience. I think the writers and producers of TOS in 1966 were also trying to do the exact same thing, appeal to a mass audience. No need to be slavish to it, and they were pretty good about that in Star Trek 2009. So it will be interesting to see how they follow it up.

    If all they are thinking about is revisiting old characters and incidents from past Trek, like Khan, then it could be a disaster! I'm thinking of that recent CSI episode where a new producer re-booted a Star Trek like series and the fan reaction at a Sci-Fi convention was negative. And Ronald D. Moore had a cameo and he's in the crowd shouting, "You Suck!
     
  18. Andy Sheets

    Andy Sheets Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2000
    Messages:
    2,371
    Likes Received:
    1
    The main thing I want for a sequel is a tighter script. I was amazed when I read the screenwriters were answering questions about plot holes in the first movie by claiming that God/Fate/Destiny/whatever willed it that way. That approach might work for Star Wars but it's not appropriate for Star Trek, IMO.
     
  19. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,657
    Likes Received:
    3,822
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
     
  20. Nelson Au

    Nelson Au Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 1999
    Messages:
    12,568
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Andy, I was thinking the exact thing regarding the writer's off the cuff kinds of comments and answers at Trekmovie to fan questions about the movie. Of course they were deflecting some questions with jokey answers to be funny.

    Travis- You make an excellent point, there are no Broccoli's here or Eon overseeing the production. In this case, Gene Roddenberry is gone. So they only have their own sense to beholden to Star Trek and the underlying concept and ideals.
     

Share This Page