Seems to be official: James Cameron will direct AVATAR 2 and 3 for Fox

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Ronald Epstein, Oct 27, 2010.

  1. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,203
    Likes Received:
    4,260
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    Here is the article.


    I seem to be a little torn with this news.


    I have the greatest admiration for James Cameron.

    He is certainly one of my favorite directors (if not my favorite).

    He has proven that anything he touches turns into

    Box-Office gold.


    Was AVATAR a great movie? Not in my opinion.
    I believe that most of the hype and success surrounding

    the film was due to it being in 3D (and very good 3D at that).


    In my opinion Cameron should have let someone else

    write that movie. It's also very much a premise we have

    seen before (Dances with Wolves and Pocahontas come
    to immediate mind).


    I do believe that by the time these new films arrive the

    astonishment of 3D will have diminished considerably.

    For that reason, the film will have to succeed on originality

    and other elements that draw us into the story other than

    the 3D.


    I wish Cameron the best with these films. If anyone
    can pull them off a second and third time it is he.
     
  2. Jose Martinez

    Jose Martinez Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Woo Hoo! I'll be first in line come 2014 and 2015. As much as I am looking forward to Tron Legacy, I think Cameron is the only one who can truly deliver a 3D experience on the big screen.
     
  3. TerryRL

    TerryRL Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2001
    Messages:
    3,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    Given that Peter Jackson is said to have gotten WB to pony up a budget of $670 million for his two upcoming 'Hobbit' movies. I can only imagine how much coin Fox has committed for 'Avatar' 2 & 3, especially since Cameron will no doubt want to deliver something even more audacious than the previous movie.
     
  4. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,512
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Overland Park, KS
    Real Name:
    Matt
    What, Smellovision?


    Static-O-Matic?
     
  5. Aaron Silverman

    Aaron Silverman Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 1999
    Messages:
    10,702
    Likes Received:
    561
    Location:
    Florida
    Real Name:
    Aaron Silverman
    I wouldn't put it past him.
     
  6. Jason Charlton

    Jason Charlton Ambassador

    Joined:
    May 16, 2002
    Messages:
    3,503
    Likes Received:
    374
    Location:
    Baltimore, MD
    Real Name:
    Jason Charlton
    I think there's a big difference between what Cameron can do versus what he will do. Let's face it - he can do whatever the hell he wants and the studios will pay it. However, he's already gone on record saying that a sizeable chunk of the first film's budget included the development of the technology used to create the film.


    They don't have to reinvent the wheel for the second and third films, so there would be some economies of scale involved (he even said as much in an extensive interview he gave to the XM Cinemagic station last year).


    Yes, one can expect the technologies to "evolve" slightly from the first film, but not to the degree that would warrant a budget increase of $100 million or more per film.


    Besides, the "novelty" of what made Avatar so special will have worn off by 2014, so even though the sequels will make huge amounts of money, I can't see them matching the cultural pheonomenon that the first one became.


    All that being said, IMO, when it comes to Cameron vs. Jackson, Cameron is without a doubt the director to whom I'd rather hand over my $335 million.
     
  7. Edwin-S

    Edwin-S Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Messages:
    5,961
    Likes Received:
    280

    Yeah. All the themes in Avatar were in Battle for Terra first. I actually think BfT did it better in a lot of respects. BfT was actually bigger in scope because of the themes of genocide and biocide on a planetary scale. One of the things that brought that film down was that the makers copped out with a happy ending.

    Edit: In order to be more on topic, I should add that it will be interesting to see if Cameron can actually come with something more original in the next two installments; however, I'd rather see him do something else before tackling the world of Pandora again.
     

Share This Page