Marshall Sander
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2002
- Messages
- 71
What is the better picture quality and which is the better value?
It might be digital coming into the box but it ain't coming out.
It ain't digital coming out of a DirecTV or DISH settop box either, it is analog. Not unless you have a rare HD box with firewire output.
Time Warner digital cable has very good picture quality, and it seems that virtually everyone who has tried both finds Warner has better picture quality than DBS satellite.
TWC out of Memphis sucks. I tried it for a month before going back to satellite. The guide on the box was slow and the picture had breakups every few minutes. I would say that quality varies by location and not cable provider.
-Robert
TWC out of Memphis sucks. I tried it for a month before going back to satellite. The guide on the box was slow and the picture had breakups every few minutes. I would say that quality varies by location and not cable provider.
I do agree that quality can vary by location. Everybody I know with it here (Cincinnati) loves the picture quality, and several people in other cities at AVS and dbsforums have said the same. In fact, some people with expensive multiroom DBS setups at dbsforums were downright pissed when they tried Warner Digital and found it had better picture quality.
But yes, if there is a problem with your local infrastructure it can cause problems, though I've never seen it. Does Memphis have Road Runner? It is likely to have problems as well, if so.
Anyhow, if your cable system is HITS-sourced, don't even bother. If not, you may have a good shot at great picture quality.
Another good thing about Digital Cable is you can try it out for a month, and drop it if you don't like it. Go DBS and you are typically locked in for a year if you don't want to spend a lot on hardware.