What's new

Satellite vs. Digital Cable vs. DirectTV (1 Viewer)

Jack Briggs

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 3, 1999
Messages
16,805
BTW, DirecTV is "satellite."

Go DBS all the way if picture quality is what you want--especially if the DBS receiver has an S-Video output. Better images and much better sound than with so-called "digital" cable. Look, I used to have both a "digital" cable feed and a standard cable feed coming into the house on separate lines; the standard feed looked better than the so-called "digital" signal. Not only that, several channels which broadcast stereo signals on the standard feed were in monophonic on the "digital" feed.

The hell with that.

In addition to a superior picture and sound, the satellite companies offer better value as well.

Do you know anyone who likes his cable provider?
 

Rod Melotte

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jan 7, 2002
Messages
237
Digital Cable is a scam! It might be digital coming into the box but it ain't coming out. Sure certain chanels look better but not THAT great!
 

Michael St. Clair

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 3, 1999
Messages
6,001
Wow, talk about some knee-jerk reactions. :rolleyes
With any digital broadcast technology, whether digital cable, digital OTA, or digital satellite, the quality depends on how much you compress the signal. And how much the signal is compressed is not universal for any given carrier.
The truth be told, digital cable quality varies from provider to provider and city to city. And 'digital' doesn't mean better, it just means digital.
Over The Air (with a good antenna and proper proximity to transmitter) and Big Ugly Dish analog broadcasts are better than ANY digital cable or DBS (small-dish digital) satellite.
GOOD analog cable is also somewhat better than both digital cable and DBS, at least the picture quality is. The problem is that so many cable providers have CRAPPY analog infrastructure. Some folks are lucky enough to have a cable provider with good analog infrastructure.
Many, maybe even most, digital cable companies use 'HITS' (Headend in the Sky) as their source for channels. 'HITS' is already compressed as hell, so any cable company that pipes 'HITS' channels is going to look bad. AT&T does use HITS, as does TCI, Comcast, and many small cable companies.
Time Warner digital cable has very good picture quality, and it seems that virtually everyone who has tried both finds Warner has better picture quality than DBS satellite. Time Warner is not 'HITS' based.
DBS picture quality is improving some with the launch of spot-beam birds, however, if the merger goes through between DISH and DirecTV (which looks likely) and they put up every full-strenght local station for every market in the country, there is no telling how compressed the channels will be. Hopefully, not very, but only time will tell.
Anyhow, the real answer to your question is 'it depends'. There is no single best-quality solution.
It might be digital coming into the box but it ain't coming out.
It ain't digital coming out of a DirecTV or DISH settop box either, it is analog. Not unless you have a rare HD box with firewire output.
 

Robert_J

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2000
Messages
8,350
Location
Mississippi
Real Name
Robert
Time Warner digital cable has very good picture quality, and it seems that virtually everyone who has tried both finds Warner has better picture quality than DBS satellite.
TWC out of Memphis sucks. I tried it for a month before going back to satellite. The guide on the box was slow and the picture had breakups every few minutes. I would say that quality varies by location and not cable provider.

-Robert
 

Michael St. Clair

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 3, 1999
Messages
6,001
TWC out of Memphis sucks. I tried it for a month before going back to satellite. The guide on the box was slow and the picture had breakups every few minutes. I would say that quality varies by location and not cable provider.
I do agree that quality can vary by location. Everybody I know with it here (Cincinnati) loves the picture quality, and several people in other cities at AVS and dbsforums have said the same. In fact, some people with expensive multiroom DBS setups at dbsforums were downright pissed when they tried Warner Digital and found it had better picture quality.
But yes, if there is a problem with your local infrastructure it can cause problems, though I've never seen it. Does Memphis have Road Runner? It is likely to have problems as well, if so.
Anyhow, if your cable system is HITS-sourced, don't even bother. If not, you may have a good shot at great picture quality.
Another good thing about Digital Cable is you can try it out for a month, and drop it if you don't like it. Go DBS and you are typically locked in for a year if you don't want to spend a lot on hardware.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,052
Messages
5,129,605
Members
144,285
Latest member
blitz
Recent bookmarks
0
Top