Revolution season 1 thread

Discussion in 'TV Shows' started by joshEH, May 13, 2012.

  1. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,515
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    What the heck is he going to program without power? An abacus?

    Watching several documentaries recently, I just can't get over how universal this is; you would think the effect would stop at a certain point OR that some things wouldn't be effected.. I'm totally unsure of how a steam based engine would be effected, or a hydro-powered grain mill.

    But those are minor issues. I'm really just put off by the "let's destroy pendants" angle because if you are right, and she has another plan, why did they risk so much and do all that stuff earlier for pendants? And, if she doesn't have a plan, they just wiped out their only power source.
     
  2. Adam Lenhardt

    Adam Lenhardt Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    17,067
    Likes Received:
    1,786
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    It seemed pretty clear to me that while she destroyed the pendants to prevent Randall from tracking them, she was willing to destroy them because she'd already come to the conclusion that the only way to end things was to find a way to turn all of the power back on.
    It's better than having him be villainous for the sake of being villainous. He felt that his son died in vain, and he wanted to create a world where people didn't die in vain -- even if that meant a lot more people dying in the short term.

    Because he was the assistant secretary of defense, he probably blamed himself in a way that most other parents of fallen soldiers would not.
    She may or may not have had a role in inventing them, but you're right that she definitely didn't know everything about them. Randall didn't either, since he only started activating them to track them after he kidnapped Grace.
    That may be the way they're leaning, but as Matt pointed out it doesn't make much sense. Software is just numbers, and numbers on their own can't bend the laws of physics. While there is obviously a software component to the pendants, there has to be a hardware component as well that allows them to do what they do. Rachel was drawing electrical diagrams in that lab.
    The show has previously shown that steam engines DO work, or the never could have taken the train to Philadelphia. Presumably water mills would work too. And the electrical impulses in living creatures still work, or every person and animal on earth would have dropped dead. On the other hand, certain explosives and fuses were said to be far less reliable than they'd been before the blackout, so it's not just pure battery and grid-powered devices that are effected.
    To be fair, all the stuff they did earlier for the pendants was before they joined up with Rachel. It's possible she would have said, "let's destroy the pendants" right from the beginning.
     
  3. Josh Dial

    Josh Dial Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2000
    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes Received:
    110
    Real Name:
    Josh Dial
    Right--that was clearly displayed (as in it was displayed in a clear fashion) to show that she was working on the hardware side of things. All I'm saying is that the software is the "hard part" that is better left destroyed than collected.

    Of course, Rachel might have, instead, been working on some countermeasure to be placed in the Tower. Hopefully we'll find out before the end of the season. One semi-positive thing this show has going for it is nothing is really dragged on at all. Nobody can say it just spins its wheels: the plot drives forward (some would say too fast, actually).
     
  4. Josh Dial

    Josh Dial Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2000
    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes Received:
    110
    Real Name:
    Josh Dial
    HOLY CRAP! It's finally nanobots!!!
     
  5. Patrick_S

    Patrick_S Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2000
    Messages:
    3,254
    Likes Received:
    93
    ….and how are those nanobots sustaining themselves after 15 years? There is no power left to consume and as machines they would require power to survive and reproduce.
     
  6. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,515
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    They are all solar powered.

    Actually, I like this concept, that the medallions just ward them away.. there are problems with this beyond self-sustainment.. primarily that they are running out of control and their methods wouldn't be universal, they could only block what they know or were programmed for.
     
  7. DaveF

    DaveF Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2001
    Messages:
    17,492
    Likes Received:
    1,382
    Location:
    One Loudoun, Ashburn, VA
    Real Name:
    David Fischer
    I don't know if I liked this episode. Runaway nano bots, I'm cool with that. I flashed back to Crichton's "Swarm"But angry mama-bear with Rachel wasn't interesting to me. The torture and info extraction from Neville was, in the end, well plotted. But his escape was equally bad, for me. So uninteresting. I like him chained, immobile, and still having the upper hand through emotional manipulations.
     
  8. Sean Bryan

    Sean Bryan Sean Bryan
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    3,518
    Likes Received:
    578
    Real Name:
    Sean
    So last week's episode was preempted by news coverage of the bombing in Boston. Does anyone know if that episode is playing this week instead?
     
  9. Stan

    Stan Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 18, 1999
    Messages:
    3,362
    Likes Received:
    338
    Loved Crichton's "Swarm". Enjoying this show, but still confused as to why Rachel is destroying the pendants. Aren't there only 12? I figured they all had to come together to restore power, but she dunks them in acid?

    Sounds like maybe the Leland Orser character and Grace can maybe build new ones, but this is starting to approach Lost "make stuff up as we go territory" and might fall to pieces or lose its audience. I put up with Lost until just before the last season and gave up, it got so silly. I hope Abrams has a full thought-out plan for this story.

    Then again, we got "Do no Harm" and "Last Resort", even "Fast Forward" a few years ago which I really enjoyed, but they just wrote themselves into holes they couldn't get out of.
     
  10. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,515
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    I still don't get why everyone uses swords. Gunpowder would be impacted by the nanites.
     
  11. todbnla

    todbnla Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 1999
    Messages:
    1,514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    39466
    Real Name:
    Todd
    So question: the episode shown tonite (4/22) about the nuke, is that the 1st of the return or the 2nd episode since this came back on in the last few weeks?
     
  12. Josh Dial

    Josh Dial Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2000
    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes Received:
    110
    Real Name:
    Josh Dial
    Swords are awesome, that's why :)
    This was the fourth episode back from the break. It was scheduled to air last week. but was preempted by coverage of the events in Boston.
     
  13. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,515
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    How the heck on foot did they get from Georgia to Kansas in such a short period?
     
  14. Adam Lenhardt

    Adam Lenhardt Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    17,067
    Likes Received:
    1,786
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    I continue to be impressed by how stone-cold they continue to make Rachel Matheson. Elizabeth Mitchell often seemed like she was grasping at straws in her underwritten role on "V", but she's excellent here. She has no hesitation about taking an "ends justify the means" mentality.
    The show wasn't very clear on the time line, but given that Miles's leverage over Tom Neville was the numerous battles he'd won as commander of the Rebel-Georgian coalition forces, I think it's safe to say that months have gone by between episode 13 and episode 15.
     
  15. Patrick Sun

    Patrick Sun Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    38,638
    Likes Received:
    418
    I don't even care about timelines anymore. This show just barrels through these weird cat-n-mouse confrontations, and trying to shoe-horn in more tragic undertones with these past remembrances of relationships gone sideways.
     
  16. Greg_S_H

    Greg_S_H Executive Producer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    15,397
    Likes Received:
    271
    Location:
    North Texas
    Real Name:
    Greg
    They should have killed Neville and Camp. I wonder if I was the only one rooting against Charlie's rebellion....
     
  17. DaveF

    DaveF Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2001
    Messages:
    17,492
    Likes Received:
    1,382
    Location:
    One Loudoun, Ashburn, VA
    Real Name:
    David Fischer
    I'm not enjoying the season conclusion. The bone-breaker episode was terrible. It unexpectedly became much more violent, graphic, nihilistic and ridiculous. Rachel should be dead, instead we have new wonder powered nano bots. Miles is becoming Monroe. The characters are moving towards soullessmess.Following that, if there was no doubt, Rachel has a death wish, centered on vengeance. Elizabeth Mitchell is superb in the role, but I don't enjoy the character. And , and yet another mysterious mystery of mysteriousness: why is Aaron in the 'spellbook'? Nora has a brick wall collapse on her, Just shake it off. Oh, and elevator monsters. Then a complete waste of time as we wonder which character for random reasons is killing everyone off.Tom Neville and Jason are the most interesting part of the show, but that's best served in moderate doses. They can't carry the show. I've enjoyed it as a light show. Not great, but entertaining. But it's completely cratering for me now, becoming actively distasteful. Hopefully it turns around in the remaining two episodes.
     
  18. DaveHof2

    DaveHof2 Second Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    103
    Real Name:
    David Hofstede
    It's getting to the point where it's harder to tell the heroes from the villains - which is not necessarily a bad thing, but there are now so many separate groups with their own agendas (turn the power back on! Keep it off! Conquer the US! Avenge my son!) that it all just runs together.

    The preview for the season finale gives me hope that they might develop their premise and not keep the power off just to keep that plot point in place. That's what hurt 'Revenge' this year- Emily could have destroyed the Graysons several times over by now. Hopefully 'Revolution' will be able to evolve like 'Nikita,' which was not afraid to reinvent itself almost every season.
     
  19. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,515
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    Dave-

    Totally agree. The show is "revolution" not "power stays off".. if they bring back the power, the next season would still be about completely rebuilding the world, and the new forces etc. etc.
     
  20. ChristopherG

    ChristopherG Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,834
    Likes Received:
    205
    Real Name:
    Chris
    I thought that the most recent episode at "The Tower" was pretty decent. Non stop action and nifty splatter guns...
     

Share This Page