Reviews on new "Ran"?

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Jeffrey Bane, Mar 31, 2003.

  1. Jeffrey Bane

    Jeffrey Bane Agent

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2002
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Anyone out there seen a review of the new edition?
     
  2. TimJS

    TimJS Second Unit

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2001
    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here, Here & our friends at DVDBeaver did a comparison with the Fox Lorber release.[​IMG]

    Tim
     
  3. Doug Pyle

    Doug Pyle Second Unit

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 1998
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Middle of the Pacific
    Real Name:
    Doug
    Has the newer Ran DVD been re-released individually, or is it still available only as part of the (expensive!) set?

    Nevermind - found the answer:

     
  4. JonBoriss

    JonBoriss Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    the new ran comes out seperately April 15th I believe.
     
  5. ChuckDeLa

    ChuckDeLa Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes Received:
    0
    A quick review of the commentaries:

    Prince's is pretty good, he gets repetitive sometimes but at least there's not much dead air. Covers a lot of different aspects of the film. If you liked his commentary on Red Beard, you'll like this one.

    Grilli's is kinda useless, lots of dead air, and the rest is mostly unenlightening personal anecdotes or occasional appreciation for what's happening on screen. This one should have been done as an interview or something.
     
  6. Ken_McAlinden

    Ken_McAlinden Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2001
    Messages:
    6,171
    Likes Received:
    66
    Location:
    Livonia, MI USA
    Real Name:
    Kenneth McAlinden
    The first "gline" review linked above is pretty consistent with my views on the video. It is a definite improvement over its predecessor, but it is still filled with annoying artifacts that are evident to even casual viewers. It's a step in the right direction, but it has not traveled as far as it needs to go. [​IMG] I did not think the 5.1 mix sounded hollow or muddy. It seemed OK to me. The mono is 2.0 mono instead of 1.0 as indicated on the packaging.

    Anyway, the film is too good to not want to own its best representation on video, so despite my complaints, I don't regret my purchase.

    Regards,
     

Share This Page