TinmanLU27
Grip
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2014
- Messages
- 24
- Real Name
- Keith
Thoughts on the benq 1070??
It's bright enough, and a very popular, highly rated projector. For a 120" diagonal image, the lens would need to be mounted between 10' and 13' 1" from screen. BUT the lens shift is very limited, so you need to mount it at the proper height.The only negative about the Benq W7000 is it's already more than 2 years old.The next step up would be the Epson 5030, a little over $2,500 though.Thoughts on the benq 1070??
Not quite. The Pan. 8000 first came out in Sept. 2012, 16 months ago. I didn't recommend the Pan. 8000 because it's a little on the dim side for him.schan1269 said:Saying the W7000 is two years old is the same reason to "not buy" the Panny 8000.
Only if you dont get the bug. If there is one thing I have learned its that you get the best equipment your budget will allow and you get it the first time. To get lesser equipment, simply to save a buck, will ultimately cost you more in the long run. Better equipment from the beginning not only takes longer to justify an upgrade but sometimes much longer, it often holds its value better and longer as well. This applies especially to speakers and displays, processors and sources maybe not so much.TinmanLU27 said:I understand my budget allows for more , but who doesn't like to save a buck.
I just read a press release about the Benq W7500 at Projectorcentral.com. It says to be released this month. Also, there are 2 review links in the W7500 thread at Avsforum.You can't go by the total lumens listed. You need to go by the foot lamberts listed at Projectorcentral.com under "Calculator Pro". You set your throw distance and screen size for the projector, and it shows you the foot lamberts. The desired minimum is 16.TinmanLU27 said:Any idea when the 7500 will be released?? Jim, how many lumens should i be looking for if the 7900 is too dim?? 2000??