Bob Movies
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2000
- Messages
- 200
I saw "Pieces of April" last night, and I absolutely loved it. It's a funny, touching tale of a family reuniting for Thanksgiving. I can't recommend it highly enough, just a really great story with fantastic actors. It starts Katie Holmes, Oliver Platt, Derek Luke, and Patricia Clarkson. It was written and Directed by Peter Hedges, who wrote "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" (the novel and the screenplay) and the adaptation of "About A Boy" (for which he was nominated for the Oscar last year).
When I saw the trailers for this, I promised myself that I wouldn't go see it in the cinema because it was shot on DV, and I'm not a fan of DV. If I'm going to pay $13.50 for a movie, it should look good! As I was reading more about how the movie got made, I read some interviews with Peter Hedges about the difficulties they had getting it financed. Apparently they had the movie set up three different times with budgets between $4 million and $7 million, but all of them fell through. Finally, he teamed up with InDigEnt and made it for $200,000 on DV with a 16 day shooting schedule.
I was surprised at how good the DV looked. It wasn't 35mm, but it was more than acceptable as far as visual quality. If I wasn't such a movie nerd I doubt I'd be able to tell that it was anything other than a "regular" movie. I saw a 35mm print (not a digital screening) and it looked great. The reason it looked great, more than anything else, wasn't anything technical... It was because the story was so good. I simply wasn't thinking about the format it was filmed on because I was too busy getting to know the characters, laughing at all the funny parts, and crying when it was sad.
This was an inspiring movie. Immediately after I saw it I bought the script and read it. Peter Hedges gives some very insightful commentary on how scenes were changed during the filming to simplify the story. It's a fantastic script, and a fantastic movie, and I highly recommend it!
Bob
When I saw the trailers for this, I promised myself that I wouldn't go see it in the cinema because it was shot on DV, and I'm not a fan of DV. If I'm going to pay $13.50 for a movie, it should look good! As I was reading more about how the movie got made, I read some interviews with Peter Hedges about the difficulties they had getting it financed. Apparently they had the movie set up three different times with budgets between $4 million and $7 million, but all of them fell through. Finally, he teamed up with InDigEnt and made it for $200,000 on DV with a 16 day shooting schedule.
I was surprised at how good the DV looked. It wasn't 35mm, but it was more than acceptable as far as visual quality. If I wasn't such a movie nerd I doubt I'd be able to tell that it was anything other than a "regular" movie. I saw a 35mm print (not a digital screening) and it looked great. The reason it looked great, more than anything else, wasn't anything technical... It was because the story was so good. I simply wasn't thinking about the format it was filmed on because I was too busy getting to know the characters, laughing at all the funny parts, and crying when it was sad.
This was an inspiring movie. Immediately after I saw it I bought the script and read it. Peter Hedges gives some very insightful commentary on how scenes were changed during the filming to simplify the story. It's a fantastic script, and a fantastic movie, and I highly recommend it!
Bob