Patton Blu-Ray remaster in the works

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by RobertR, Apr 27, 2011.

  1. RobertR

    RobertR Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 1998
    Messages:
    9,690
    Likes Received:
    159
    An update from The Digital Bits:

     
  2. Powell&Pressburger

    Powell&Pressburger Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    318
    Location:
    MPLS, MN
    Real Name:
    Jack
    I don't understand why they would waste their time and money with this re-issue. They should cancel the upcoming re-issue and opt for releasing it once the new HD transfer is completed.
     
  3. benbess

    benbess Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    2,148
    Likes Received:
    443
    Real Name:
    Ben Hufbauer
    Better late than never!
     
  4. dana martin

    dana martin Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Messages:
    2,737
    Likes Received:
    696
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Real Name:
    Dana Martin
    wonder if this will end up being like Gladiator, where you can get the Blu Book, and then exchange it for a correct disc?
     
  5. JoHud

    JoHud Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,201
    Likes Received:
    500
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak

    Yes, it is very odd that they did not push back the Digibook version for this new master. Did they really have to make that Memorial Day deadline? Does there really have to be 3 separate bluray releases of Patton?


    Regardless, I am very happy to hear a better version is coming along. Maybe it will be packaged with a remaster of The Longest Day, which suffered a similar abomination of a release.
     
  6. Scott Merryfield

    Scott Merryfield Executive Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 1998
    Messages:
    11,751
    Likes Received:
    802
    Location:
    Michigan
    This is disappointing news. I do not understand why Fox would re-release such a poor transfer when the remaster is in the works.


    In any case, I just canceled my order at Amazon.
     
  7. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,331
    Likes Received:
    4,688
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert


    Same with me, not a good decision customer service-wise when it comes to producing a quality product.
     
  8. Mark-P

    Mark-P Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,032
    Likes Received:
    898
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    Jeez, I wonder if Amazon just saw a ton of pre-orders get cancelled? It doesn't make sense to me why they would reissue the "bad" master again with full knowledge that they were going to correct it a few months later. Each release costs money to produce, why wouldn't they just cancel the May release and focus their efforts on the upcoming remaster? Unless of course they have a huge stockpile of discs from the first release that they are sticking into the Blu-ray book to use up the inventory. That would at least make sense.
     
  9. GMpasqua

    GMpasqua Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Greg

    Most on this forum (and the few others there) probably wouldn't have pre-ordered it until the reviews come out

    Those not on these forums would propably have no idea in the first place


     
  10. Pete York

    Pete York Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    4

    That's at least in the neighborhood of 'predatory', no? Yes, those that don't know, don't care. But Fox knows, and they know they have a remaster coming down the pike. Sounds like an ethical issue (for as far as these things go).
     
  11. GMpasqua

    GMpasqua Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Greg
    I wouldn't say those that don't know wouldn't care. They may care, they just aren't informed. How many Walmart shoppers actually read Disc reviews?


    FOX does know, and yes, FOX is probably better off waiting for the remaster. It's sneaky when they know they're releasing a remaster, but remember "Let the buyer beware"
     
  12. JoeDoakes

    JoeDoakes Cinematographer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,513
    Likes Received:
    655
    Real Name:
    Ray
    All this does at least suggest that Patton is selling well. The only reason I can think of to rerelease the old version is to avoid losing sales from lack of stock or to take advantage of the anniversary prior to the remaster coming out. Also, my thought on the whole issue of the extra-smooth, nongrain treatment of the original release is that I think Fox fell for the taste test fallacy. That is, I have heard that focus groups were shown grain and nongrain versions of films and chose the nongrain version as the preferred one. However, these types of tests often lead people to focus on some particulary obvious aspect of the sample and single it as their supposed preference even if, over time, they might not really prefer it. Back in the 1970s when Pepsi had the Pepsi challenge, most people said they preferred Pepsi to Coke largely because they focused on the greater sugar in Pepsi. However, over time, people really tend to prefer Coke and now both Coke and diet Coke lead Pepsi in sales (no offense to Pepsi fans).
     
  13. ahollis

    ahollis Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen


    You are absolutely correct. I first read of the May release not being re-mastered at Digital Bits, but I guarantee most people that live in Sullgent, AL don't read Digital Bits or HTF, but they do go to Wal-Mart.
     
  14. Charles Smith

    Charles Smith Extremely Talented Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    1,168
    Location:
    Nor'east
    Real Name:
    Charles Smith
    In addition to the moral issue in releasing this again, it's just a damned stupid business act to deliberately and knowingly flood the market with another zillion copies of a known-to-be-shitty product.
     
  15. Robert George

    Robert George Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    64
    Since we are going to now drag morality into this debate, it should be pointed out that not everyone thinks the current incarnation of Patton on Blu-ray is "shitty", even on these narrowly focused forums where the herd mentality is so prevalent. Among more mainstream consumers, I would speculate the vast majority of those that have seen this disc think it looks terrific.


    So, before we go accusing Fox of a lack of morals, perhaps we should step back and consider that, perhaps, Fox is simply marketing a product that has already been a good seller for them.
     
  16. Cinescott

    Cinescott Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    848
    Likes Received:
    162
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Real Name:
    Scott
    Agreed that on a
     
  17. Scott Calvert

    Scott Calvert Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 1998
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    2

    So it's OK to nuke any old film in the mastering suite as long as joe shmoe thinks it looks great?
     
  18. Robert George

    Robert George Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    64

    I have reread my post several time now and I can't seem to find anything that would/should lead one to this conclusion.
     
  19. Cinescott

    Cinescott Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    848
    Likes Received:
    162
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Real Name:
    Scott

    Agreed. I honestly believe Fox made a good faith effort on Patton and missed the mark. There's little doubt that transferring film to hi def is an art form and there will be stumbles from time to time. Those who care deeply about every nuance of a transfer can be heartened with the fact that a new transfer is on the way later in the year. For others, this disc will do just fine. Personally, I hope it sells very well. The more Fox makes on Blu, the more for everyone.
     
  20. JoHud

    JoHud Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,201
    Likes Received:
    500
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak
    Yes, Patton, The Longest Day, and the Predator rerelease were essentially missteps in the in the earlier days of Blu-ray remastering at Fox. This announcement and the fact that subsequent Fox blu-rays avoided the mistake of complete grain removal is essentially an acknowledgment that those releases are now substandard with Fox's current standard of quality for Blu-ray releases (not including their MGM co-releases).


    Its just sort of odd that this 5/10 re-release is a more expensive Digibook release compared to the first, which can still be found stocked in most department stores, yet still use the same subpar transfer when the new one is about 6 months off. Makes me curious as to what exactly the Fall/Winter release is going to be (maybe Sound of Music style box with Patton action figures?)
     

Share This Page