Official Review vs. Discussion Threads

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by AdrianJ, Oct 3, 2001.

  1. AdrianJ

    AdrianJ Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2001
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know that official review threads are for just that, but is it always necessary to start a discussion thread for small movies like The Deep End which only had a total of 13 posts in the review thread?
    ------------------
    [​IMG]
    Adrian Jones
     
  2. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,459
    Likes Received:
    4,818
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Adrian,
    It really depends on the film. There are some movies that are considered small films but might generate a great deal of discussion due to subject matter, acting performances, film setting and etc. Speaking for myself personally, I try not to designate a seperate discussion thread for a small film unless a member starts a thread to discuss the film in question or I feel it deserves to have a thread to discuss the film in more detail than just a film review. However, my partner in crime, "Dugger" might have a different viewpoint than mine.
    Crawdaddy
    ------------------
    Peter Staddon: "I didn't say you can put 'Monkeybone' back!"
     
  3. AdrianJ

    AdrianJ Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2001
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    0
    Okay, since it's likely I will generate a lot of replies to my own questions, I started a new Deep End discussion thread. I've copied the messages over into the thread, so you may feel free to delete them out of the review thread.
    Clueless as always,
    --adrian
    PS: What is the context of the Peter Staddon quote?
    [Edited last by AdrianJ on October 03, 2001 at 03:52 PM]
     

Share This Page