Alex Spindler
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2000
- Messages
- 3,971
Does anyone know how long this film is? Might be able to squeeze it in before LotR!
Scott,
why are you asking for spoiler tags in a movie that has now opened. This is the 'discussion' thread, if somone wants no spoilers they should go to the 'review' thread.
It's been my experience that even in Discussion Threads, people will use spoiler tags when discussing very specific details about a movie's ending. Your argument would probably hold water if we were discussing Planet of the Apes or Psycho, but Panic Room been in release for about 24 hours now.
I've participated in Discussion Threads for films I haven't seen yet, and I'm sure others have too.
Just my two nickels; they're only worth a dime.
Mark, what kind of substance would you have wanted? I don't know how the movie could of been better.
Not that I think it's necessary to view the film through the filter of Rear Window, but Hitchcock's film provides an example of how Panic Room might have been meatier. (Besides being a terrific thriller, Rear Window is also an allegory for the moviegoing experience, with Jimmy Stewart standing in for the audience as voyeur.) I'm not saying that Panic Room should have been about the movies. It very well could have delved more deeply into the subject of modern isolation and paranoia (themes not unfamiliar in Fincher's oeuvre) than it does.
Fincher is a talented director, but the material here is almost too slight for his abilities. It's the sort of movie he could probably crank out half asleep for the rest of his career if he wanted to do so. Panic Room is equivalent to Steven Soderbergh's Ocean's 11, a film I enjoyed more, in that both are above the material they were working with. While both have made entertaining movies, I'd like to see their talents put to better use on more challenging films.
One other thing... Although there's a lot of nifty camera moves and tricks, it seemed to be a bit much after awhile.
I liked Panic Room and found it relatively engrossing for its duration. I just would have liked a little more.
P.S. Oh, the husband's name (Stephen Altman) was somewhat distracting since it's the name of Robert's son, who works on his father's films.
Fincher's stylistic quality began to work against him..he relied too much on shots/camera movements he has used in the past
I respectfully disagree. Camera movements are sometimes a director's "trademark." Look at films directed by Martin Scorsese and Stanley Kubrick. They use(d) a lot of the same camera movements in their films and it was never to the detriment of their films. Same thing with Fincher. He has a style that I love. Moreover, I believe you are referring to some of the shots that looked very much like the ones in Fight Club. There were a few lifted right from Fight Club but it defintely wasn't working against either film.