New Bond Film: Skyfall

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Richard--W, Jun 20, 2009.

  1. Richard--W

    Richard--W Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    167
    Morgan, Purvis and Wade to
    work on Bond, James Bond
    LOS ANGELES, June 12 – Producers Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli of EON Productions Ltd and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures have today announced that Peter Morgan (Frost/Nixon, The Queen), Neal Purvis and Robert Wade (Quantum of Solace, Casino Royale) will be the screenwriters of the 23rd James Bond adventure.
    Daniel Craig will reprise his role as Ian Fleming’s James Bond 007 in the film, which will be a MGM release of an EON production. Bond 23 is the latest installment in the longest-running franchise in motion picture history and will be produced by Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli. A date for the start of production is yet to be confirmed.
    “Peter, Neal and Robert are extraordinarily talented and we’re looking forward to working with the three of them,” commented Wilson and Broccoli.
    Peter Morgan is the award-winning writer of such films as The Last King of Scotland, The Queen and Frost/Nixon, which was based on his play. He has also scripted the upcoming The Special Relationship for HBO and Hereafter for DreamWorks. He will turn his attention to Bond 23 on completion of these duties. Morgan is represented by UTA (US) and Independent Talent Group (UK).
    Since 1991 Neal Purvis and Robert Wade have collaborated on a diverse range of projects including The Italian Job, Johnny English and the past four Bond films. They recently adapted John Le Carre’s The Mission Song and are also working on the upcoming sequel The Brazilian Job. Purvis and Wade are represented by Endeavor (US), Casarotto Ramsay & Associates (UK).
    more here
    Bond begins anew with scribe trio - Entertainment News, Gotham, Media - Variety
     
  2. Tino

    Tino Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    8,230
    Likes Received:
    1,758
    Location:
    Metro NYC
    Real Name:
    Valentino
    Why is this bad news??
     
  3. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,471
    Likes Received:
    3,687
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    Got me but I'm sure it has something to do with Casino Royale.
     
  4. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,326
    Likes Received:
    4,688
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    That it's actually going to be made.[​IMG]
     
  5. Adam Lenhardt

    Adam Lenhardt Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    16,974
    Likes Received:
    1,729
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    I have yet to come across a Purvis and Wade Bond picture that I haven't enjoyed. True, The World Is Not Enough doesn't hold up spectacularly well on repeat viewings and Die Another Day is entertaining but riddiculous. But whatever Richard might say, Casino Royale was one of the best Bond films ever, and Quantum of Solace was great "minor" Bond.
    Peter Morgan's an interesting choice to replace Paul Haggis on polish duties, though. Nothing in his filmography of very internalized melodramas seems to point to the Bond franchise. It should be interesting.
     
  6. DavidJ

    DavidJ Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Messages:
    3,093
    Likes Received:
    231
    Real Name:
    David
    Dang it, Adam. You always seem to just beat me to the post and after I read your posts I don't really have much to add. [​IMG]
    I really like the mix of writers that they have on this one. As much as I liked the last two, I thought that going forward they needed to add back some of the lighter, fun elements that have been associated with the franchise. Those associated with the franchise seem to agree. Purvis and Wade are a good choice in that respect and the inertia of the "first two" films should keep them from swinging too far to the ridiculous.
    I love the choice of Morgan for polish duties as he'll keep it grounded. I'd hate to see them throw away the character development of the first two movies and that shouldn't happen with Morgan. A specialist in "internalized melodramas" seems a perfect choice to me.
     
  7. Zack Gibbs

    Zack Gibbs Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    2
    I've enjoyed most of the (Bond) movies Purvis and Wade have been involved with, but I wouldn't credit them with any of that. Sometimes it's more in spite of them.
     
  8. Richard--W

    Richard--W Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    167
    Astute observation.
    Bad writing has plagued the series for a long time. Eon knows that good writing isn't important so long the script creates an event. A Bond film is an event, and they will make just as much money with bad writing as with good.
     
  9. Sam Favate

    Sam Favate Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,145
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Real Name:
    Sam Favate
    Hey, mods, can we change the title of this thread, as I doubt most of us would say the item posted is "bad news"? Maybe just call it "Bond 23"?
     
  10. Joe Karlosi

    Joe Karlosi Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,005
    Likes Received:
    21
    Doesn't sound like bad news to me. I liked CASINO ROYALE (not QUANTUM OF SOLACE, though). But then again, I can watch and appreciate any Bond movie.
     
  11. Ray H

    Ray H Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2002
    Messages:
    3,481
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    NJ
    Real Name:
    Ray
    Morgan's an interesting pick as a writer, but it hardly ever matters. The Bond franchise has a long history of picking filmmakers that aren't typically known for making action movies and it's typically hit or miss.
     
  12. Ron-P

    Ron-P Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2000
    Messages:
    6,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Ron
    Not bad news to me either, actually, quite good news. Looking very forward to this as the last two have been some of, if not, the best Bond films todate.
     
  13. Edwin-S

    Edwin-S Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Messages:
    5,970
    Likes Received:
    282
    Why? The OP thinks it is bad news that two writers he has a low opinion of are going to be involved, yet again, in the new Bond flick. He seems to be a big Bond fan and thinks the last two outings have a lot of problems as Bond films. I agree with some of his points regarding "Casino Royale" and other points I don't. People can disagree with his conclusion that these two writers are "bad news" for the series, but he obviously feels differently and started this thread with that conclusion in mind.
     
  14. Josh Dial

    Josh Dial Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2000
    Messages:
    2,796
    Likes Received:
    104
    Real Name:
    Josh Dial
    Maybe because given the amount of members this forum has, and its place at the top of similar-type forums, the owners and mods like to keep the number of threads to a minimum. While it's fine for a thread-starter to voice an opinion, I think the community is better served with a neutral thread title--otherwise it's a slippery slope towards "good news for Bond 23," "More bad new for Bond," and "OMG Can U blieve the new bond newz?"
     
  15. Sam Favate

    Sam Favate Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,145
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Real Name:
    Sam Favate
    Since this is the first thread on Bond 23 and is likely to be around a while, I think it only fair not to saddle the production and the film with such an unfortunate title to the thread. Given the immense blockbuster status of the last two films, it hardly seems a stretch to say most people won't consider this "bad news."
     
  16. Zack Gibbs

    Zack Gibbs Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    2
    Then just start a new Bond thread and let this one die. The moderators wont do anything about it unless you bug them.
     
  17. Brent M

    Brent M Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    4,486
    Likes Received:
    0
    The title of this thread is just stupid, not to mention very misleading. I clicked on it expecting to read that either the film wasn't being made or Craig would not be reprising his role. It should be called "news about Bond 23" or something to that effect.
     
  18. Jason Hughes

    Jason Hughes Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 1998
    Messages:
    884
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Jason Hughes
    Amen. Stupid is putting it mildly...
     
  19. Ron-P

    Ron-P Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2000
    Messages:
    6,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Ron
    Just PM the OP, he should be able to go into the edit feature, advanced, and change the title himself.
     
  20. Richard--W

    Richard--W Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    167
    Okay, I adjusted the thread title because some of you are expressing distress and anxiety, and I want everybody to be happy.
    Some people have very strong feelings about the Bond films. Some people feel so strongly about Bond films they think it gives them license to insult other people personally instead of discussing / debating the film.
    The involvement of Neal Purvis and Robert Wade in the next Bond film is bad news. Really bad news. Hence the original title of the thread. If the mods want to change it to Bond 23, it's okay with me. Changing the title of the thread won't change the fact that the involvement of Purvis and Wade as screenwriters in the next Bond is bad news. Really bad news. Or, the thread title could be changed to Stop! Or My M. Will Shoot! Again! which would give everyone an accurate idea of what to expect from the next Bond script by Purvis and Wade.
     

Share This Page