My dilemma: Panasonic ZT vs. Samsung F8500

Discussion in 'Displays' started by Ronald Epstein, Nov 6, 2013.

  1. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,208
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    For years I have been wanting a Panasonic plasma. Almost bought one three years ago until by chance, I won an LG display at a trade show. The LG display was a top-of-the-line THX certified 3D plasma and I have been rather pleased with it.

    But with Panasonic announcing it was stopping production on its displays, I suddenly realized that this would be the last opportunity for me to own what many consider to be the absolute best plasma available, the ZT series.

    My goal was to buy the 65" ZT display this very morning....

    ...that is, until I actually saw one on display today.

    I took a trip to visit my friend, Robert Zohn. He owns Value Electronics located in the cozy town of Scarsdale, NY.

    He has a Panasonic ZT 65" mounted on the wall next to the Samsung 64" F8500. Both were showing the same identical demo content consisting of various daytime and nighttime sequences designed to show off different levels of HD.

    It was very clear to the both of us that the Samsung had the better picture -- so much so, that the Panasonic ZT looked almost lifeless next to it. The Samsung was pushing a brighter picture (both displays were maximized in luminance), and you could see far more detail and sharpness. The Panasonic looked dull next to it.

    Blacks? I would say that the Panasonic probably had 2% better blacks than the Samsung, but it was only slightly more pronounced when the demo material went totally black, displaying nothing but the television logo.

    I could not have been more frustrated by what I saw. Robert Zohn told me that everyone that has seen both displays side-by-side show the same frustration. He explained that the novices generally immediately select the Samsung over the Panasonic. However, the purists will pick the Panasonic purely for the deepest levels of black that they can get....

    ...but for me, the black levels were negligible while the Samsung clearly had more picture pop to it.

    This is really killing me, because I have been programmed to believe that the Panasonic ZT series is the Kuro killer. To pick anything else would be buying a vastly superior product.....yes?

    ...but to my eyes, that Samsung didn't look a little better --- it looked vastly better. It even won the Value Electronics shootout over the Panasonic ZT, by the slimmest of margins, just because of the level of luminance and detail.

    Want to get one of these displays in my home next week. So, I have a day or two to make my decision. I know I am about to get a wealth of conflicting opinions, but perhaps as I wade through them, I will get a clearer idea of which display I should choose.

    Looking forward to any input.
     
    TheBat likes this.
  2. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,241
    Likes Received:
    4,618
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    I'll repeat what I stated beforehand to you. I would go with the display that gives you the most pleasing picture to your eyes. If that's the Samsung then buy it. Besides pricing/warranty, remember to take in consideration your home viewing environment in making that decision. Viewing distance, ambient light and such. Both, Dave and Kevin make excellent points about the lighting so I can't stress your home viewing environment enough in making your final decision.
     
    TheBat likes this.
  3. TheBat

    TheBat Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 1999
    Messages:
    3,088
    Likes Received:
    28
    Real Name:
    Jacob
    Robert is right. I would suggest looking at other panasonic tvs before you make up your mind.. try the vt series. you might like that one better. I have a gt25 that I got a few years back. I want to upgrade in size. for me its a no brainer about getting another panasonic.

    Jacob
     
  4. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,241
    Likes Received:
    4,618
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Man, I wish I could justify getting ZT model, but I can't since I just bought a VT last year at this time and a GT model for my bedroom in two years ago. I'm very happy with both displays.
     
  5. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    If you want the best possible 3D then the Samsung will give it to you as it can go much brighter, i think you will want that as you like your 3D content and that Samsung will work well for you.

    I do hear image retention is slightly better on the Panasonic this year, the Samsung E6500 i have doesn't get any at all, it's the main reason i went for it, that and the fact the black level was good enough for me, i think there is not a huge difference in black levels between the Samsung and Panasonic this year, the extra brightness the Samsung provides will make it's image pop better simply because great light output coupled with great black levels makes for a pleasing image.

    http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/samsung-ps64f8500-201305012945.htm

    The review above might help you decide, i actually watched the Value Electronics shootout live on the webcast.
     
  6. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,241
    Likes Received:
    4,618
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    The one possible shortcoming the Pannys have is that their 3-D performance isn't quite as good as some other manufacturer models. It's good enough for me, but others might feel diffrently as Ron likes to watch a lot of 3-D and does many reviews of such films.
     
  7. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,208
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    When you say the Samsung has full resolution 3D what does that exactly mean? Both use active shutter glasses which provide full HD resolution as opposed to passiveI am not sure I like the Samsung glasses as you have to replace battery rather than the ability to recharge. And, Robert, what shortcomings do you find in the Panasonic 3D?
     
  8. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,241
    Likes Received:
    4,618
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Shortcomings is probably the wrong word to use, some have rated the Panasonic 3-D performance as good, but not as high as Samsung.
     
  9. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    You can use Panasonic 3D glasses with the Samsung, i use the 2012 ones with my set.

    I'll use the site i linked above now. The Samsung uses a different method for their 3D and it gives you full resolution, the Panasonic method can bring jagged edges/aliasing into the image, at least according to the review site i hang out at.

    The Panasonic TX-P55VT65B also uses the Multiline Simultaneous Scanning Method, which effectively means that the highest contrast (most visible) changes in the picture are drawn at full resolution, but intermediate brightness steps are drawn at the equivalent of 540p. It’s an interesting technique which has clearly been deployed for good reason.
     
  10. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,241
    Likes Received:
    4,618
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
  11. Type A

    Type A HW Reviewer
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Real Name:
    Ty
    My input? You are extremely lucky. You actually had the opportunity to view both in a direct side-by-side comparison using, what I assume, is a calibrated display mode. We should all be that lucky. Seems to me you should be the one providing opinions rather than the one asking for them. Go with what your heart tells you and remember, the looser panel will not be in your home to provide buyer's remorse.
     
  12. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    Interesting, it does say a firmware update would be released to fix some of the 3D issues, i wonder if the HDTV folks had a set with this updated firmware as they usually spot things like the above, maybe Ronald needs to audition both sets in a dark room with 3D material and see which one is better to his eyes.
     
  13. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,241
    Likes Received:
    4,618
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Let's be honest, I don't think Ron will go wrong with either display.
     
  14. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,208
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    Here is the problem...and no-one should take what I am about to say personally....

    My gut tells me to go with the Samsung F8500 having seen it in person.

    However, people whose opinions I have very high respect for are urging
    me to go with the Panasonic ZT.

    True, I saw both displays in a room that was fairly well lit. I will be watching
    the display in a totally blackened home theater.

    And everything I read about the demise of plasma is due to the fact that people
    see them in brightly lit stores next to an LCD that outputs brighter light and get
    fooled into thinking that LCD is the better display format.

    In this case, I could be fooled by the heightened amount of light output of the
    Samsung.

    Then I read reviews on Amazon like this. Yeah, I know, it's an Amazon review
    but it kind of agrees with my gut instinct about the Samsung model...
    The mention of detail is what really hit home.

    The Samsung displayed far more detail than the Panasonic. It was night and day.
     
  15. TheBat

    TheBat Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 1999
    Messages:
    3,088
    Likes Received:
    28
    Real Name:
    Jacob
     
  16. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,208
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    How is it dealing with battery 3D glasses? My LG is rechargeable and I like that option. The new Panny are the same. However, the Samsung glasses are battery and for some reason that worries me. How often do these batteries need replacing?
     
  17. Sam Posten

    Sam Posten Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1997
    Messages:
    20,714
    Likes Received:
    1,825
    Location:
    Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
    Real Name:
    Sam Posten
    Reviewing both of them with luminance cranked is hardly a good idea, what's up with that? Torch mode? :( I suspect something was very wrong either electronically or with the calibration of the panasonicn(if not the selection of torch mode, could be any factor), if it was enough for you to call it lifeless. I'd have checked out the picture in the OOTB THX mode just to see the difference personally.But.I'd wager that once in your home without other distractions, in lighting you are used to and either after 'real calibration or simply in the THX mode it would be awesome. Ultimately You'll be super happy with either of them.But.I don't know that I would buy a top of the line Plasma today vice a comparatively lower priced more mainstream model. I am very happy with my VT50 but I don't know that I have gotten more 'value' from the bells and whistles it has over the one one step down.Of course, I prefer PJs myself so take that all with a grain of salt =)
     
  18. Sam Posten

    Sam Posten Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1997
    Messages:
    20,714
    Likes Received:
    1,825
    Location:
    Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
    Real Name:
    Sam Posten
    This is my opinion: If you are relying on torch mode level output to compensate for ambient lighting you are doing it wrong. Either control the lighting or if that is not possible buy a mainstream LCD display that will handle the poor lighting about as well and save you the money over the premium plasma that would have been wasted in an un-optimal viewing environment from the start.For the record my VT-50 is just fine in daylight viewing despite have 6 large double stack windows in the room with it. Black out blinds work wonders although you can still see them reflected in the screen in many (not my main) seating positions. YMMV.
     
  19. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    I suspect they will last a very long time, maybe there is a manual you can download online somewhere that will tell you, it's fairly simple to replace these batteries, having said that i do not like Samsung 3D glasses, mine are in a drawer now and i use Panasonic ones due to the fact i wear glasses and they fit better around the ears.
     
  20. Gregg Loewen

    Gregg Loewen Video Standards Instructor, THX Ltd.
    Insider

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 1999
    Messages:
    6,379
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    New England
    Real Name:
    Gregg Loewen
    Nice dilemma !
     

Share This Page