mp3 bitrate question...

Discussion in 'Music' started by Adam.Heckman, Jan 29, 2004.

  1. Adam.Heckman

    Adam.Heckman Second Unit

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is there a bitrate of mp3s that matches the quality of a CD? Or is there inherent flaws in the mp3 format (range or whatever) that make it, by default, inferior to CDs?

    Thanks in advance!!
     
  2. dan fritzen

    dan fritzen Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    0
    I read once that somewhere between 168 to 256kbits is CD quality, I like everythign 256 or 320 myself, although I have mp3's at 128 that sound more dynamic than others at 256. Not only is the bitrate important, but the encoder used as well. I use the one in DiscJuggler because it is free with the software, otherwise the add in one for Nero is good as well.

    I am sure someone will reply with a more up to date test and give us a mroe precise answer.
     
  3. FeisalK

    FeisalK Screenwriter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,245
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMO the very fact that MP3 is a compression method makes it inherently inferior to CD which is uncompressed PCM. It's not a flaw or anything its just the way it's made.

    However, it also depends on the resolution of the system playing back the MP3. On most portable MP3 playback systems (and probably mid-range as well) 128kb is sufficient. And at 256kbps or more (on an average system) you will most likely not be able to discern the difference between MP3 and uncompressed PCM, so it will sound 'just as good' as CD.
     
  4. PaulP

    PaulP Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2001
    Messages:
    3,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lame is considered one of the best encoders. I encode my music at 192 with the latest Lame codec, with Stereo and HQ settings, and it sounds maybe even better than on CD [​IMG]

    On this note, the new AAC format should be even better than MP3 - Winamp 5 supports it, and has AAC de[n]coding capabilities (maybe only in Pro version). It's supposedly has the same compression ratio as MP3 but sounds much better - supposedly a 128 AAC sounds like a 192 MP3...
     
  5. robertLP

    robertLP Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Anyone use the iTunes encoder? How does it rate compare to LAME?
     
  6. Angelo.M

    Angelo.M Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,007
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is there a bitrate at which mp3 becomes transparent (no audible difference versus redbook CD) to your ears? Only you can answer through trial and error.

    It's a compression format, so information is lost. Whether or not that makes an audible difference is up to you.
     
  7. RobBenton

    RobBenton Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Around 256kb it becomes very hard to tell the difference between an mp3 and the original CD. Some people can't tell the difference at 192kb Just try a few different things and see which you like best.
     
  8. ken nomimashita

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    it really depends on the person. mp3's sound different somehow to me. i cant really explain it though. i guess its the software.
     
  9. PhilBoy

    PhilBoy Second Unit

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    0
    I only use a 100% Variable Bit Rate...

    The song files in size work out to about 1/3, but even with a very good pair of cans it is hard to tell the difference between mp3 and .wav.
     
  10. Thomas Newton

    Thomas Newton Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    25
    You lose quality because MP3 is a lossy compression format. You trade quality for higher compression ratios.

    There are lossless compression formats, like .ZIP and .SIT and Meridian Lossless Packing, but they aren't necessarily designed for real-time encoding or playback. At best, you can expect maybe 2:1 lossless compression, where a low-to-medium-quality 128 Kbps MP3 gives you ~10:1 compression.
     
  11. Jonathan Dagmar

    Jonathan Dagmar Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    723
    Likes Received:
    0
    Usiing Windows media is better than Mp3, and support for Windows Media is pretty goof these days among hardware.

    With Windows Media audio 9 you can get the same quality as MP3 at half the bit-rate, so it is a much superior format.

    As for what bit-rate MP3 becomes indecipherable from CD? I guess that depends on what kind of system you are listening on. On a portable player Mp3 is a godsens because it can be so small, but when i play mp3 on my home theater i think they sound terrible.
     
  12. BrianMB

    BrianMB Agent

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    For lossless compression there are:

    MonkeysAudio

    FLAC

    .SHN

    They all only compress a music file in half, but hard drives are cheap[​IMG]
     
  13. RobBenton

    RobBenton Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    I actually prefer mp3 to windows media.. windows media is supposed to be better at a given bitrate but i never like the sound of it... to harsh sometimes. Also to be exact a 128kb mp3 file is 12:1 compression, but is nowhere near the cd quality it claims to be and neither is windows media.
     
  14. Jeremy Scott

    Jeremy Scott Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    0
    i download or rip all my music to 128.

    i like the sound of 128.
     
  15. Herschel

    Herschel Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    For me, I encode everything with LAME and the standard preset, which tends to give you around a 185 kbps average bitrate. I can't tell the difference between that and the original. But, if I play that back through a surround system using Pro Logic II, it's really bad. PLII always seems to extract nothing but MP3 artifacts for the rear speakers.
     
  16. Wayne Bundrick

    Wayne Bundrick Cinematographer

    Joined:
    May 17, 1999
    Messages:
    2,358
    Likes Received:
    0
    You get bad things from Dolby Surround (ProLogic and ProLogic II) if the digital compression of the source does anything to disturb the phase relationships of the two matrixed channels. Phase is probably the first thing to suffer in any digital compression which tries to isolate similar sounds in multiple channels and encode them only once. Basically, all the noise artifacts that you're not supposed to hear because of psychoacoustics will become concentrated in the rear after Dolby Surround decoding.

    This can be avoided if the encoder does "mid/side" encoding, which works with L+R and L-R instead of L and R. Dolby Digital will do this if it is told that the stereo source audio is a Dolby Surround matrix. MP3 also has a mid/side mode.

    MP3 encoding is almost always "joint stereo", which is supposed to automatically determine on a frame by frame basis, based on the audio content, whether it needs to use regular stereo mode or mid/side mode. The LAME encoder is supposed to do a better job at making this determination than the standard calls for.

    You can override LAME's joint stereo mode. There are three modes you should try: stereo, mid/side, and dual independent channels. With mid/side and dual independent channels, you may need to increase the bitrate because you are limiting the encoder's abilities.
     
  17. Jonathan Dagmar

    Jonathan Dagmar Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    723
    Likes Received:
    0


    stop stealing
     
  18. dan fritzen

    dan fritzen Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    0


    Didn't you see the pepsi ad yesterday, where accussed music downloaders sued by the RIAA, said they will not sop downloading music for free?
     
  19. BrianB

    BrianB Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2000
    Messages:
    5,211
    Likes Received:
    1

    Believe it or not, not everyone who downloads music from the internet is stealing music.

    Personally, I pay to download music from eMusic and rip my (paid for!) CDs at ~192k VBR using CDex & LAME.

    /me looks at my bank statement for the ~$90 I spent on CDs last night at BestBuy.

    Yeah, I steal all my music.
     
  20. Richard Travale

    Richard Travale Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2001
    Messages:
    3,426
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    The Island, Canada
    Real Name:
    Rich Travale
    Yeah, where do you get "I steal" out of "I download"? There are so many pay per download services out there that this type of response is unwarranted.

    I usually have my MP3s encoded at 160. Since 90% of my mp3 listening is through headphones at the computer (the other 10% on my discman) anything higher would be a waste of space.
     

Share This Page