Movies that are too weird for their own good.

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Frank@N, Oct 18, 2003.

  1. Frank@N

    Frank@N Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've seen a few movies lately that seem too weird for their own good.

    By weird, I mean sufficiently detached from reality so as to prevent believability and frustrate many viewers.

    Oddly enough, all three contained Luke Wilson...

    Bottle Rocket (1996)
    Home Fries (1998)
    Royal Tenenbaums, The (2001)

    I actually tried to sell 'Home Fries' back (something I very rarely do), but most stores refuse to accept it.
     
  2. Dome Vongvises

    Dome Vongvises Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2001
    Messages:
    8,172
    Likes Received:
    1
    I really can't think of any for the moment, but I can honestly say that David Lynch hasn't made a film like that (or at least ones that I've seen). His execution may be highly stylized and weird, but the basic principles and concepts behind his stories aren't exactly hard to decipher.
     
  3. Steve_Tk

    Steve_Tk Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2002
    Messages:
    2,833
    Likes Received:
    1
    I can't think of any of the top of my head. But any movie that goes beyond it's realm of believability does this for me. For example Star Wars, now there is a lot that they can do that we 'believe' to be able to exist in their world. But if Star Wars 3 comes out, and Obi Wan just starts flying like superman, well that would be stupid.

    There are movies that do this all the time. They have a fine movie until some damn dumb thing happens that shouldn't be in that story.
     
  4. Jason Boucher

    Jason Boucher Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 1999
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can't tell if you guys are speaking tongue in cheek. David Lynch not hard to decipher? What about Yoda flying around! Now I'm not condemning David Lynch or George Lucas, both my favorites, but I agree that sometimes films do get a little too weird for their own good.
     
  5. MartinTeller

    MartinTeller Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    I haven't seen Home Fries, but I can't imagine what you find "weird" or unbelievable about Bottle Rocket or Royal Tenenbaums.

    The only movie offhand I can think of that I thought was "too weird for its own good" is Tetsuo: The Iron Man.
     
  6. Dome Vongvises

    Dome Vongvises Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2001
    Messages:
    8,172
    Likes Received:
    1
     
  7. Steve Christou

    Steve Christou Long Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    15,587
    Likes Received:
    333
    Location:
    London, England
    Real Name:
    Steve Christou
    David Lynch's Eraserhead, still the weirdest, strangest movie ever made.
     
  8. Steve Christou

    Steve Christou Long Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    15,587
    Likes Received:
    333
    Location:
    London, England
    Real Name:
    Steve Christou
    Just like to add Tetsuo: Body Hammer (1991) to the list of super-weird, a sequel of sorts to the already mentioned Tetsuo: Iron Man (1989).
     
  9. BarryS

    BarryS Second Unit

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  10. Jason Harbaugh

    Jason Harbaugh Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,968
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

    Very creative, interesting, but just too weird and out there for me to enjoy it.
     
  11. george kaplan

    george kaplan Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2001
    Messages:
    13,063
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well I do think that Blue Velvet is too weird for it's own good, though perhaps not in the sense of preventing believability or being difficult to decipher. I didn't find Blue Velvet to have anything where I thought "that would never happen, how unrealistic". Rather, I found him as a filmmaker focusing on something weird, that didn't serve the mystery, or the movie except to try to be weird. And for me, that kept the film from ending up on my shelf.
     
  12. MartinTeller

    MartinTeller Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    The weirdness in Blue Velvet very much serves a purpose. It amplifies the disorientation Jeffrey feels in the situation he's gotten himself into. It's an Alice-in-Wonderland kind of thing.

    In my opinion, Eraserhead is only impenetrable to those who try to take it too literally. I believe the movie acts mostly as a template for the viewer's imagination and fears. It lets you (and makes you) decide what it's about for yourself.
     
  13. TheLongshot

    TheLongshot Producer

    Joined:
    May 12, 2000
    Messages:
    4,118
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was going to mention "Fear And Loathing", since I just watched it a couple of nights ago again, and still didn't quite "get" it.

    I think I'll also put "Joe Verses The Volcano" here as well...

    Jason
     
  14. Dan Lindley

    Dan Lindley Second Unit

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2000
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    0
    How about Jacob's Ladder? I like the film and saw it a few times before buying the DVD, but there is something a little too odd about it. That said, Blue Velvet is perfect by me. And Fear and Loathing is a far wierder book than a movie because the movie tries to translate crazy scenes into something on screen. Oddly, reading things like the White Rabbit scene in the bathtub is far more real than watching them.

    Does anyone else feel that way, that some books read far better than the movie? In some cases, books invite far more reality and suspension of disbelief than movies.

    Might it be books that could be real, but aren't like Fear and Loathing? And what of Lord of the Rings and such fantasy... do movies dampen or enhance the experience for such?

    Great thread.

    DL
     
  15. Scott Weinberg

    Scott Weinberg Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    7,477
    Likes Received:
    0
    Steven Soderbergh's Schizopolis

    Early Cronenberg? Most of David Lynch's stuff. Just about ALL of Peter Greenaway's stuff. Lotsa Ken Russell flicks. Gregg Araki's junk. The Raimi/Coen combo Crimewave.

    Being John Malkovich
    City of Lost Children/Delicatessen

    (Not commenting on the quality of these films (aside from Araki), just the weirdness.)
     
  16. Lawrence X

    Lawrence X Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  17. Terry St

    Terry St Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    0
    Go watch "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari", a couple Fellinni flicks like "Roma" or "8-1/2", Cronenberg's "Naked Lunch" and Seijun Suzuki's "Tokyo Drifter". Even Eraserhead fans will be wierded out by something in this list. I have to agree that Greenaway has made some pretty crazy stuff too, like "Prospero's Books". (an adaptation of the Tempest that *badly* needs to be released on DVD!!) Most of the other movies mentioned are just not wierd enough to even be considered "wierd". I'm sorry. A lot of you guys need to get away from Hollywood movies for a bit to get some perspective.

    "Too wierd for their own good?"

    Hell no! Wierd is good! [​IMG] Sgulp!
     
  18. MatS

    MatS Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    1,593
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  19. Joe Schwartz

    Joe Schwartz Second Unit

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2001
    Messages:
    449
    Likes Received:
    0
    Liquid Sky was too weird for me. One viewing was more than enough.
     
  20. MartinTeller

    MartinTeller Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    Heh, I love Liquid Sky! And Greenaway! And F&LILV is not at all weird if you've read (and understood) the book.

    I guess I just see weirdness as a good quality. I might agree that City of Lost Children is too weird for its own good. Not that it's "too weird" in general, just that the weirdness seems forced.
     

Share This Page