Josh Dial
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2000
- Messages
- 4,512
- Real Name
- Josh Dial
I think Agent Carter is good--good, but not great. The first three episodes are certainly better than the first three episodes of SHIELD, but that isn't saying much. The leads are great, and the supporting cast is great, too. However, the dialogue is only average, and I don't think the direction is anything special (though there were a few nice shots in episode 3).
My biggest problems are the sets and the colour/softness of the show. I actually find it strange that a lot of people have been heaping praise on the show's "look," as I don't think--outside of costuming--that the show has captured the correct look at all. The image is far too soft and the colours are far too muted; you can't simply slap a filter on the lens and tweak the colours and call it noir (which, I assume, is the look that is being sought). There are, oddly, a number of similarities with NCIS. Honestly, the softness of the image is maddening at times. It's like the showrunners though "well, it's the 40s, everything is soft and dull! See? It's the paaaaast!"
Further, the world does not look lived in at all. With the exception of Carter's former apartment, everything is too clean and brand new, and there isn't enough "stuff" in the world. Most shots looks like a stage production or, really, a cheesy sitcom back lot set at a lower rent studio. Now, contrast this with Amazon's (excellent) pilot for "The Man in the High Castle," which takes places in an alternate universe where the Axis won the Second World War (adapted from the Phillip K Dick novel of the same name). Japanese San Francisco is cluttered, loud, bustling. Nazi New York and Chicago are slightly dirty, hazy, industrial (despite German efficiency).
Agent Carter's world look cheap and lazy. This is a shame, because the leads are so good. I'll watch the show (because I like it, and I really like the MCU), however, and I hope it spawns another series or more episodes down the road.
My biggest problems are the sets and the colour/softness of the show. I actually find it strange that a lot of people have been heaping praise on the show's "look," as I don't think--outside of costuming--that the show has captured the correct look at all. The image is far too soft and the colours are far too muted; you can't simply slap a filter on the lens and tweak the colours and call it noir (which, I assume, is the look that is being sought). There are, oddly, a number of similarities with NCIS. Honestly, the softness of the image is maddening at times. It's like the showrunners though "well, it's the 40s, everything is soft and dull! See? It's the paaaaast!"
Further, the world does not look lived in at all. With the exception of Carter's former apartment, everything is too clean and brand new, and there isn't enough "stuff" in the world. Most shots looks like a stage production or, really, a cheesy sitcom back lot set at a lower rent studio. Now, contrast this with Amazon's (excellent) pilot for "The Man in the High Castle," which takes places in an alternate universe where the Axis won the Second World War (adapted from the Phillip K Dick novel of the same name). Japanese San Francisco is cluttered, loud, bustling. Nazi New York and Chicago are slightly dirty, hazy, industrial (despite German efficiency).
Agent Carter's world look cheap and lazy. This is a shame, because the leads are so good. I'll watch the show (because I like it, and I really like the MCU), however, and I hope it spawns another series or more episodes down the road.