Lucasfilm reportedly nixes remaining 3D Star Wars prequels to focus on new trilogy

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Ronald Epstein, Jan 28, 2013.

  1. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,386
    Likes Received:
    4,354
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    From Deadline Hollywood
    Frankly, kind of happy about this.
    Everyone I know that has seen The Phantom
    Menace in 3D thought it was pretty lame (not just
    the film but the upconversion itself).
    Would have been better to start with the original
    three films. I saw a demo of Episode IV upconverted
    a few years back and it looked pretty damn good.
     
  2. Bryan^H

    Bryan^H Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,672
    Likes Received:
    688
    Damn! I'm finally going for a 3D projector, Star Wars is at the top of my list for films I'd like to own in 3d Blu-Ray. Well, at least I'll have Jurassic Park.
     
  3. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,445
    Likes Received:
    3,660
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    I can't imagine much of the original trilogy looking that good in 3-D. The opening shot with the blockade runner and the Star Destroyer and the Death Star battles will be neat but the 'small' scope of the OT just doesn't lend itself to 3-D. Say what you will about the prequels but massive CG environments like Coruscant and Kamino should have enough depth that they can translate to 3-D much better than a small set like the Death Star or Cloud City. Based on the reaction that I saw, many people (myself included) were underwhelmed by the 3-D conversion for The Phantom Menace and I expect to be much less impressed by the OT (when/if it happens) simply due to the nature of what was shot. Much like The Phantom Menace or Titanic or Finding Nemo, etc., I'd be perfectly happy to see the movies in a theater again in 2-D. EDIT: LFL is confirming it:
     
  4. SilverWook

    SilverWook Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,033
    Likes Received:
    486
    Real Name:
    Bill
    I thought the lenticular 3D card SW set Topps released in the 90's looked pretty good. I would have donned a trenchcoat and dark sunglasses to go see the original films on the big screen one last time, even though I don't care for the SE's much. It's been speculated the last batch of changes to the original trilogy, (like the rocks in front of Artoo when hiding from the sandpeople) were to enhance them for 3D. Money down the hole now? The usual suspects will use this to flog the "3D is dead" horse some more. ;)
     
  5. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,445
    Likes Received:
    3,660
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    The "NOOOOOOO" added to Return Of The Jedi makes more sense to me than the rocks. :) Not that I prefer the "NOOO" but I understand Lucas' apparent desire to have that line in all of the movies (is it in Attack Of The Clones?) whereas the addition of the rocks is just weird and pointless. EDIT: I answered my own question about "Nooo" being in Attack Of The Clones. When Yoda is hearing Qui-Gon from the beyond, Qui-Gon (who sounds nothing like Liam Neeson) says it.
     
  6. SilverWook

    SilverWook Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,033
    Likes Received:
    486
    Real Name:
    Bill
    Not to mention the silly extra CGI appendages popping out of Artoo when he gets shot in Jedi...
     
  7. SilverWook

    SilverWook Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,033
    Likes Received:
    486
    Real Name:
    Bill
    http://starwars.com/news/focusing-on-star-wars-episode-vii-lucasfilm-postpones-episodes-ii-and-iii-3d.html One has to wonder how much Disney has to do with this decision. I can't imagine Fox being too happy right now.
     
  8. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    5,916
    Likes Received:
    490
    Does this mean we won't get the OT in 3D? The links only mention that we won't get the other two prequels done 3D - there's nothing about the OT, but it sounds like people assume we won't get them 3D either...
     
  9. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,445
    Likes Received:
    3,660
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    LFL said yesterday "Given the recent development that we are moving forward with a new Star Wars trilogy, we will now focus 100 percent of our efforts on Star Wars: Episode VII in order to ensure the best possible experience for our fans." Plus, the official word is that the 3-D versions are postponed to some indefinite date in the future rather than being flat-out cancelled.
     
  10. Jason Charlton

    Jason Charlton Ambassador

    Joined:
    May 16, 2002
    Messages:
    3,513
    Likes Received:
    377
    Location:
    Baltimore, MD
    Real Name:
    Jason Charlton
    That's OK. Lucas himself would be the first to tell you that for him to say the OT would be re-re-re-released in 3D and then only later find a reason NOT to do so was always his intent from the beginning.
    It's all going according to plan.
     
  11. Jason_V

    Jason_V Producer

    Joined:
    May 7, 2001
    Messages:
    5,389
    Likes Received:
    635
    Location:
    Bothell, WA
    Real Name:
    Jason
    I'm really not at all shocked about this. Aside from the underwhelming box office for Phantom Menace, the 3-D was...meh-worthy. If you're going to do Star Wars (again) on the big screen, you need a GREAT reason for people to go. Mediocre 3-D isn't that good of a reason, especially since word of mouth on Episode I's conversation couldn't have been good. No skin off my nose on this one, to be honest.
     

Share This Page