Interesting new "facts" about Cinerama and 70mm from the latest Widescreen Review

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Dennis Gallagher, May 3, 2013.

  1. Dennis Gallagher

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Dennis T. Gallagher
    I don't really know where to post this new information I just discovered, but thought some here might find it interesting.

    According to an article about higher frame rates in the just-released Widescreen Review
    "Early in its development, Cinerama was conceived to offer even higher frame rates than 24fps...
    Ultimately though, the producers were only able to achieve a higher frame rate of 26fps for the
    last two Cinerama features: Windjammer and How the West Was Won."
    (I thought Windjammer wasn't a Cinerama feature and How the West Was Won was shot at
    24fps - whereas all the Cinerama travelogues were shot at 26.)

    More "information" from the same article:
    "Stanley Kubrick would have preferred to film all of 2001: A Space Odyssey in 70mm, but budget
    constraints only allowed for the special effects shots to be photographed using the larger film format."

    The article also references Cinerama screens up to 155 feet wide! Where were these?

    Any comments? Sad - as I remember early issues of this magazine had fairly informative and reasonably
    factual articles about similar topics (e.g. The Roadshow Experience).
     
  2. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,135
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    Well, I hope some wise person goes and writes a letter to the editor about these "facts." It IS sad.
     
  3. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    9,182
    Likes Received:
    4,993
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Agreed. So much for printed reference...

    I believe the Kubrick 2001 point is a simple typo. His desire was to shoot in 7mm. Actually 6.5, but prints were to be seven, and played by on very early Apple devices.

    RAH
     
    MatthewA, Stephen_J_H, bujaki and 2 others like this.
  4. john a hunter

    john a hunter Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    121
    This is just garbage. So much for "widescreen review".
     
  5. ROclockCK

    ROclockCK Screenwriter
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2013
    Messages:
    1,438
    Likes Received:
    1,150
    Location:
    High Country, Alberta, Canada
    Real Name:
    Steve
    The thoroughness of inaccuracy would suggest that maybe the original publication date was April 1st? ;)
     
  6. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,326
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
  7. Professor Echo

    Professor Echo Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,947
    Likes Received:
    1,035
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Glen
    I still remember when this same publication and its publisher INSISTED that every single Bond movie had nudity in it when shown in Europe. !!! I also remember the publisher writing article after article about his car stereo system. Sorry, but I NEVER took this magazine seriously.
     
  8. ahollis

    ahollis Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    6,488
    Likes Received:
    1,468
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen
    Is this magazine really still published? I haven't read an issue since the days of laserdisc.
     
  9. john a hunter

    john a hunter Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    121
    Presumably in cloud cuckoo land.
     
  10. Vincent_P

    Vincent_P Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,867
    Likes Received:
    201
    Widescreen Review also insisted that the aspect ratio for 70mm projection was 2.05:1.

    Vincent
     
  11. Doctorossi

    Doctorossi Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    37
    I miss the Widescreen Review of its early days.

    I really miss the The Perfect Vision of its early days.


    *sniff*
     
    Neil S. Bulk and davidmatychuk like this.
  12. Dennis Gallagher

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Dennis T. Gallagher
    Actually you've reminded me that it's probably The Perfect Vision that had the good articles.
    I have pretty much full collections of both of them - The Perfect Vision till they started to do reviews of things
    like cellphones (at least that's how I remember it) and Widescreen Review through the end of the current subscription.
     
  13. Doug Bull

    Doug Bull Advanced Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2001
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    642
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Real Name:
    Doug Bull
    I also used to love reading The Perfect Vision, and Widescreen Review back in the old days.

    It was actually Widescreen Review that got me into laserdiscs. (there were also a couple of laserdisc magazines)

    I'm a lot wiser now, but they were great reading at a time when there was little else on offer.

    Ah, wonderful memories.
     
  14. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,326
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    That was from Dr. Haze um Hays
     
    Stephen_J_H likes this.
  15. ahollis

    ahollis Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    6,488
    Likes Received:
    1,468
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen
    Still have all the issues of THE PERFECT VISION and love to go back and read them every once in-a-while. The letters section is very much like the discussions on this forum. Enjoyable.
     
  16. Charles Smith

    Charles Smith Extremely Talented Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    5,150
    Likes Received:
    1,134
    Location:
    Nor'east
    Real Name:
    Charles Smith
    Same here. The Absolute Sound, too.
     
    ahollis likes this.
  17. john a hunter

    john a hunter Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    121
    The Perfect Vision's issue on Cinerama was one if not the best on the process ever written. Unfortunately, the proposed issue on Todd AO disappeared when the magazine went belly up along with all my 70mm clips I sent them for inclusion.
     
  18. KMR

    KMR Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    26
    Real Name:
    Kevin
    My serious doubts about the magazine came when I read their review of Alfred Hitchcock's ROPE (which was not a widescreen film, but was being reviewed because it was part of a collection of Hitchcock DVDs). They complained that it appeared to be a damaged print, because of a few cuts appearing, instead of it being one continuous shot. Of course, anybody who knows this film knows that there are a few intentional cuts, which occur every time there is a projector reel change.
     
  19. ahollis

    ahollis Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    6,488
    Likes Received:
    1,468
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen
    I remember how disappointed I was the article on TODD-AO was never published.
     
  20. john a hunter

    john a hunter Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    121
    Then Films in Review was supposed to publish the ToddAO article but they folded just before as well. Jinx?
     

Share This Page