Remember, the Inn's manager stated that "the reception in that area had never been any good".I actually this movie had fewer plotholes than you normally get in a horror/thriller movie.
Basically, what I'm trying to say is this: There are NO plot holes... only things left for future exploration.The more I think about it, the more I stand by my observation. How does the girl in the beginning of the film know about the urban legend of the tape? That opening conversation between the girls doesn't make much sense.
As for references to Ring 2 or info from the rest of the Ring series to fill in the blanks, Roger Ebert has a movie rule I actually agree with: "if it isn't shown (or discussed), it didn't happen" (I'm paraphrasing horribly).
I still enjoyed the film from an aesthetic standpoint.
Cheers,
Felix
As for references to Ring 2 or info from the rest of the Ring series to fill in the blanks, Roger Ebert has a movie rule I actually agree with: "if it isn't shown (or discussed), it didn't happen" (I'm paraphrasing horribly).What if the sequel finally clears up some of these issues, but leaves more questions for another sequel, how will you feel about this movie then?
Or what if it is a trilogy and twenty years later they decide to write a prequel to show the origin of The Ring and then make Special Special Editions of the original three to fix the plot holes? (suddenly this implausible scenario doesn't sound so implausible-ahem-Lucas)