DVD Review HTF REVIEW: A History of Violence (Highly Recommended)

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Matt Stone, Mar 14, 2006.

Tags:
  1. Matt Stone

    Matt Stone Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2000
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1
    [​IMG]
    A History of Violence
    Directed By: David Cronenberg

    Studio: New Line
    Year: 2005
    Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1 (Anamorphic)
    Running Time: 96 Mins.
    Rating: R (Strong Brutal Violence, Graphic Sexuality, Nudity, Language and Some Drug Use)
    Audio: 5.1 Dolby Digital (English), 2.0 Dolby Digital (English)
    Subtitles: English, and Spanish
    MSRP: $28.98
    Street Date: 14 March, 2006

    Review Date: 14 March, 2006
    (Ratings are out of five stars)

    Summary
    You've seen the trailers, maybe even read the comic book, but I'm not going to get into too many plot details in this review. Viggo Mortensen plays small-town diner-owner, Tom Stall, who when push comes to shove is able to fend off a couple of thieves/murderers/etc. It isn't long before a group of crime syndicate goons come to town assuming Tom is long-lost Mafioso, Joey Cusack. That's all your getting out of me. Needless to say, Cronenberg is able to effectively blend all of his artistic elements (direction, cinematography, acting, etc) into a brilliant film.

    Cronenberg introduces a corruptive, menacing element early on. In fact, the opening sequence of a film does a lot to set up the overall tone and style. Cronenberg presents us with slow developing, visual storytelling highlighted with moments of grisly violence. This tone is achieved through excellent cinematic vision. Lighting and composition are both used very effectively in A History of Violence. A subdued autumnal color scheme is tweaked with the use of light and shadows to express subtext and atmosphere. The composition and framing of the film reminded me of Lynch. Cronenberg's picturesque representation of small-town life with a dark twist was like something out of Blue Velvet. Moving shots were used sparingly, but very effectively and even Cronenberg's static shots had a kinetic energy about them. Characters tilted their heads or the camera was pointed in a way that showed off the structural angles of the shot. It made for a very substantial 3D look to the film as opposed to something shot flatter without any depth of field. Howard Shore's atmospheric score also helped define the film. It's mostly subdued but occasionally rises to a triumphant climax. There are always hints of menace in the music. In fact, it reminded me a lot of Shore's exceptional Silence of the Lambs score.

    The acting is terrific. Nuance is on display and even Ed Harris (who I believed would come a cross much more cartoonish) underplays his role to a very solid level. Maria Bello (Tom Stall's wife) plays an excellent emotional barometer for the film. William Hurt was deserving of his Oscar nom with his unique performance. I can say it's like nothing I've ever seen Hurt do. He wasn't in he film much, but he had a huge impact. Viggo is Viggo. The guy has the ability to make most roles better, and this one is no exception. He comes across as completely natural and down-to-earth, with subtle hints of something darker. Whether Tom is in fact Joey Cusack in hiding, the penetrating explosion of violence in his life awakens something else. With the flip of a switch, Viggo is able to convey an entirely different personality, both menacing and calculating.

    There is an absolute crazy level of gore in this film. It's always tied to utterly brutal events that pop up like exclamation points to plot details. Nobody directs violence like Cronenberrg and he's at top form in this film. It's ironic that the gore level is over-the-top, but Cronenberg tells the story through subtext and visual storytelling. On the whole, the movie is very subtle underscored with moments of deafening violence. The film examines our perception of violence with the use of great bookend moments. What defines a heroic act? An aggressive act?..etc. The film gives no definite answer, but certainly provokes the viewer to an opinion of some sort. Cronenberg visually explores this theme with a high level of skill.

    It's movies like this that get me excited about movies. I feel like I could write a book about it, but if I keep going on, I know I'll never stop. I'd also probably give away the entire ploy, and we can't let that happen. You need to see this film for yourself. Rent it, buy it, just find it.

    Film Rating: [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    Video
    The video was a little on the grainy side. I’ve said before that grain doesn’t bother me, and that was certainly the case here. For this film, the dirt and grime worked. It didn’t seem to have been done in an arbitrary manner. I did not get the chance to see this film theatrically, but it seems to be well represented on the DVD. The colors looked very natural and the excellent lighting presented beautifully on the DVD. Another top-notch job from the always excellent New Line Studios.

    Video Rating: [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    Audio
    New Line has also done a great job presenting the audio portion of this film. While most of the movie is a talking-heads drama, the score and action scenes were showcased effectively. The sound comes primarily out of the front channels, but rears are used for ambiance and music. Howard Shore’s brilliant score sounds beautiful and enveloping, while voices sound crisp and clear. I didn’t notice any problems with hiss on the dialog channel or any other audible anomalies.

    Audio Rating: [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    Extras
    Commentary with David Cronenberg – David Cronenberg is a very interesting guy that doesn’t have too much trouble talking about his films. He occasionally falls into the trap of narrating and there are a few quiet moments, but overall a very interesting commentary. Cronenberg discusses everything from the film’s production, the acting, up through the thematic element. I haven’t listened to a Cronenberg commentary before, but I may have to dig up my old DVDs and give them a spin.
    Acts of Violence (1 Hr. 6 Mins.) – This is an interesting feature. It breaks up the different acts of violence in the film and allows you to view a little analysis/documentary about each scene. You can also utilize a play all feature and have the sequence play as more of an all-encompassing behind-the-scenes documentary. There’s a lot of interviews edited together with on-set footage. As a big fan of the movie and Cronenberg, I found this all to be very interesting. It’s a very intricate look at the film’s production.
    Scene 44 (Deleted Scene) (2:46) – An interesting look deleted scene that was finished for the DVD (almost reminiscent of the Star Wars prequel DVDs). You have the option to listen to a commentary from Cronenberg over the scene where he discusses reasons for dropping it and his acceptance of special features on DVD.
    The Unmaking of Scene 44 (7:04) – A more detailed look at the previous deleted scene made up of on-set footage and interviews.
    Violence’s History: United States Version vs. International Version (1:23) – A very brief look at the differences (2 very small changes) between the US (R-Rated) and International releases of the film.
    Too Commercial for Cannes (8:59) – This featurette looks at A History of Violence’s appearance at the Cannes Film Festival.

    The DVD also features some trailers of other New Line films.

    Extras Rating: [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    In Closing…
    People can talk about the Oscar controversy between Crash and Brokeback Mountain, but A History of Violence is the best film that came out of 2005. It marks an absolute return to brilliance for David Cronenberg. With the extensive extras and solid DVD presentation, any casual fan of the film should pick this one up. I’m happy to say that of all the films I’ve reviewed here at the HTF, A History of Violence is the first that I can highly recommend.

    Overall Rating: [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    Matt Stone
    14 March, 2006
     
  2. MatS

    MatS Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    0


    'history' not future
    [​IMG]

    didn't get a chance to see this at the cinema
    I am looking forward to viewing it at home, as positive as your review is I think I might just rent instead of a blind buy
     
  3. Matt Stone

    Matt Stone Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2000
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1
    Curse my lackluster proofreading skill! [​IMG]
     
  4. MatS

    MatS Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    0

    you're gonna hate me but......
    2005
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Matt Stone

    Matt Stone Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2000
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1
    We can blame that second one on lack of sleep. Hehehe [​IMG]

    ...wow, I can't believe I screwed that one up twice.
     
  6. George_W_K

    George_W_K Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,592
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    Ohio
    Real Name:
    George


    Shouldn't it be 2005 ?

    [​IMG]
     
  7. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,225
    Likes Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    Now that you've corrected your dates... [​IMG]
    I can say that I completely agree with that. It's definitely not a movie that everyone will enjoy but I thought it was great. Cronenberg's last few movies haven't lived up to some of his past glories (like Videodrome or The Fly or Dead Ringers) but this was a return to form for him.

    The extras on the disc are pretty nice as well.
     
  8. George_W_K

    George_W_K Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,592
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    Ohio
    Real Name:
    George
    Nevermind, you guys posted as I was reading the review![​IMG]

    I enjoyed this film a lot, even though I was expecting something a little different. I'm happy with the purchase.
     
  9. Matt Stone

    Matt Stone Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2000
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think this was the first time a thread has been completely derailed by it's initial post [​IMG]
     
  10. Elijah Sullivan

    Elijah Sullivan Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    665
    Likes Received:
    2
    Typo aside, I agree with Matt's closing statement. It definately isn't everyone's taste so far as enjoyment goes, but in terms of overall quality and artistic worth, it's unrivaled by anything I saw in 2005 - except maybe The New World, which is even less consistantly approved.

    Hopefully both these films will be better appreciated in later years. Having lost to Crash will become a household joke for both titles.
     
  11. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,170
    Likes Received:
    4,245
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    I'll repeat the comments I made in another thread.

    I bought this DVD blindly based upon Oscar buzz.

    Popped it in the other day and was blown away!

    Though there are a lot of holes in the story and
    the way characters realistically react, I thought
    that on sheer entertainment value, this is a highly
    satisfying film.

    I agree with Matt that everyone should do whatever
    they can to get a hold of this film and watch it.
    I really think that it's probably the best "popcorn
    film" out there right now.

    And William Hurt....his best performance EVER!
     
  12. oscar_merkx

    oscar_merkx Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    7,632
    Likes Received:
    1
    Really great movie as Viggo carries this one.

    I agree that William Hurt is absolutely riveting as his brother.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Sam Davatchi

    Sam Davatchi Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,151
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the spoiler!
     
  14. Brett_M

    Brett_M Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,397
    Likes Received:
    58
    Location:
    Mos Eisley Spaceport
    Real Name:
    Brett Meyer
    Another typo: Blue Velevet

    lol

    Great review and I wholeheartedly agree. I saw it twice theatrically. I thought Viggo Mortensen was a fine actor before I saw AHOV. Then I saw this film a second time -- he is brilliant. If you didn't like it the first time, give it another try.

    The extras are quite good for a single disc. I watched all of them last night. I'll watch the film tonight. A worthy edition to any collection and an easy blind buy for Cronenberg/Mortensen/Harris/Hurt fans. ROBBED AT OSCAR TIME. DESERVED MANY MORE NODS, imho.
     
  15. Adam_S

    Adam_S Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2001
    Messages:
    6,281
    Likes Received:
    113
    Real Name:
    Adam_S
    I agree, I saw this last night and was blown away, made me completely revise my top ten of 2005. So what other films are your best of 05 Matt?

    I don't think the violence was a 'crazy level of gore,' though, in fact I felt it was pretty restrained, quick shots with blood and the camera doesn't hold back from glancing at what happens after a gun shot, or a nose punch. The fighting is really street, dirty, quick and brutal, and mostly close. This is not elegant and civilized slaughter of orcs, it's random and clumsy and nasty.

    I loved it!

    You didn't really mention Tom's family, how his son and wife are affected by violence and how it changes their relationship to him. I love how the threads of family weave in and out through this film, punctuated and emphasized by moments of intense violence, as though sealing them together.

    If I had one criticism of the film, its that kids with such a solid family in that part of the country are rarely as bitter and cynical as the son is when he's with his girl friend. The bitter cynical ones tend to hate their family and dislike everyone in it, which isn't true. If he was just bitter and cynical against the alpha male bullshit he gets from the school star athlete, that's one thing, but it was directed at middle-class life in general, which I felt was the one false character note in an otherwise flawless film.

    Adam
     
  16. Jeff Swindoll

    Jeff Swindoll Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2000
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    1


    Well, I was a bit confused since the intro to the DVD's menu almost makes you think that the movie has started already [​IMG].

    I'm gonna finish watching it tonight.

    Might need to go out and buy the wife a cheerleader outfit.......... :b
     
  17. Matt Stone

    Matt Stone Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2000
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1


    I had a hard time picking a cohesive top ten this year, so for the time being I haven't really chosen anything. I'll post something when I have it.
     
  18. Holadem

    Holadem Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2000
    Messages:
    8,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Same here, after 40 or so screenings. Pretty weird.

    --
    H
     
  19. Mike.P

    Mike.P Second Unit

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Easily my number one of 2005 - with Sin City in close second.

    How this got so few nods is beyond me...

    Viggo is the man.
     
  20. DanFe

    DanFe Second Unit

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    421
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess I'm the only one who didn't care much for it. Rented it last night and the violence in many ways seems gratuitous and unnecessary. I also found the Howard Shore music somewhat jarring because it sounded like he was trying to imitate his scores from LOTR.
     

Share This Page