What's new

Blu-ray Review HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: The Benchwarmers (1 Viewer)

Michael Osadciw

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
1,457
Real Name
Michael Osadciw
Blu-ray Disc REVIEW



benchwarmerblu.jpg

THE BENCHWARMERS

Studio: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
Film Year: 2006
Film Length: 80 minutes
Genre: Comedy

Aspect Ratio:
1.85:1 Theatrical Ratio

Colour/B&W: Colour

Audio:
English Uncompressed Linear PCM 5.1 Surround

English 5.1 Surround

French 5.1 Surround

Subtitles: English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Korean, Thai
Film Rating:






Release Date: July 25, 2006.


Film Rating: :star: :star:
htf_images_smilies_half.gif
/ :star: :star: :star: :star: :star:

Starring: Rob Schneider (Gus), David Spade (Richie), John Heder (Clark), Jon Lovitz (Mel)

Written by: Allen Covert & Nick Swardson
Directed by: Dennis Dugan


It’s never too late to take a stand.



This film goes out to all of the nerdy kids who never had the chance to play baseball. If you were teased and bullied by schoolmates and you felt intimidated to join sports teams because you feared the jocks, or maybe you were on a team but were never given the chance to play – you were just a benchwarmer - this film could give you a little inspiration for the hope that you can overcome those fears…

Gus is your average neighbourhood worker who knows what is right and wrong. He becomes friends with grown-up geeks – the local paperboy Clark and video store employee Richie. These three grown men were teased, and still are teased by local jocks. They see kids in the area, who have a passion for baseball, get pushed around by bullies. Even though Richie and Clark have never played a ball game in their life, the three of them decide to beat these bullies at their own game by playing the teams who think they can push around anyone. This sets the film up for some funny moments. With the help of Mel - a mega-rich geek, they will build a new stadium for all kids to enjoy. There is only one problem – a secret - Gus really isn’t who he appears to claim and he’ll have to find closure for some of the ghosts in his past.


VIDEO QUALITY 7/10
:star: :star: :star: :star: :star: :star: :star:

I’ve decided to rank the video quality of these discs on a 1-10 scale. A Blu-Ray score of 5 will mean that it is similar to the best-looking DVD I can think of and the remaining 5-10 will be based on the extended resolution of Blu-Ray disc. I think this is the best way to rank these titles for now so I hope this will help you to determine what a reference HD disc is. As more BDs become available and authoring improves (as was in the early DVD days) the earliest titles I’ve ranked as “10” may not appear as “reference quality” anymore. Please note that I’m currently viewing this on a 1280x720 projector and I’m not even able to see half of the 1920x1080 information on this disc. In the simplest terms, instead of seeing 6x the resolution of DVD I’m only seeing 2.6x the improvement. Our display devices have a long way to go before we can see all of the picture information contained on these discs. This disc was reviewed on the Samsung BD-P1000 on a 35-foot Monster M1000HDMI to a calibrated PT-AE700 (D6500/D5400B&W). The screen is a D110" (8-foot wide) Da-Lite Cinema Contour (w.Pro-Trim finish) and Da-Mat fabric.

The Benchwarmers is presented in 1.85:1 as a small amount of unused black area can be seen at the top and bottom of the picture. For my second BD viewing of a full-length film, the image is impressive. The more Blu-Rays I watch, the better I’ll be able to rank the image between them. Depth perception is much better than DVD – the opening titles over the moving image seem to float out from the screen and the closing credits of a film have never looked so defined. What makes the image so pleasing is the absence of edge enhancement – there isn’t a trace here – and compression artefacts. Some film grain can be seen in some parts of the picture, mostly in the trees in the far far distance.

All of the details in the picture come to life – you can count the freckles on kids’ faces, you can see the sweat and veins popping out of the arms of the coaches, you can see the fine textures in the jerseys of the teams – all of this would be lost on DVD. What makes the jump to Blu-Ray even more impressive is the improved colour resolution – if you think you’ve seen nice blue skies on DVD, this film has plenty of them! The film is shot mostly outdoor on the baseball diamond so the camera angles tend to look up from the catcher’s point of view when the batter is up. This film has excellent contrast with solid black levels that have never looked so deep even on a bulb projector.

If there was one thing to pick at of this film is the slightly pasty look of the colours. While definition is great and colours pop out, it has that crayon kinda look to it that doesn’t make it seem real enough. After watching a trailer for the film Click (featured on this disc) you can see the mega difference in image quality between the two.

PCM AUDIO EXPERIENCE: 7/10 :star: :star: :star: :star: :star: :star: :star:
DOLBY DIGITAL AUDIO EXPERIENCE: 6/10 :star: :star: :star: :star: :star: :star:

For the sake of consistency with the video, I’m going to rate uncompressed PCM (and eventually the lossless audio compression formats when available), as well as lossy Dolby Digital and DTS on a scale from 1-10. This rating is based on “satisfaction” – the highest score delivering the greatest amount of satisfaction and the lowest delivering the least. When defining satisfaction, I mean both the resolution of the audio as well as the sound design for the film. I’m listening for the best experience possible.

This is a basic soundtrack and not very exciting. Most of the film is center-channel driven. Most of the dialogue and effects emit from this area. Beyond the center channel is music and basic effects such as crickets, birds, glass shattering, etc. The surround channels are very limited in terms of use. Many times I had to put my ear right up to the speaker to make sure it was still on – hardly effective for this film. But at times they blared with a good crash as you’d want to take cover from Clark’s bat being thrown over your head. These sounds are spatially integrated and it gave a good sense of depth in the rear soundstage.

As far as sound quality goes, you’ll be pleased with the balanced nature of this soundtrack. Bass and treble are never exaggerated and bass can be found in all channels too. LFE isn’t that prominent but does provide a good effect or two for the transducer. I chose to listen to the uncompressed PCM soundtrack on this disc because it is miles ahead of the lossy Dolby Digital 5.1 option. There seems to be a slight volume difference between the two, possibly up to 3dB, but there are significant differences between these soundtracks – more significant that what I’ve heard when comparing Dolby Digital to half-bitrate DTS and between Dolby Digital and Dolby Digital Plus on HD-DVD.

The uncompressed PCM 5.1 experience does not favour any frequency. No matter what I heard – the music, the main effects, the ambience effects, dialogue, it all sounded much better than lossy Dolby Digital. In direct comparison you can clearly hear Dolby Digital discarding audio data – all sounds appear to be missing part of itself. There is the perceived effect that the Dolby soundtrack seems to emphasize some frequencies more than others because audio data has been removed. So compared to the uncompressed PCM (I believe it is 16bit/48KHz), the Dolby soundtrack is very lacking with many sounds subdued more than others. Only with the uncompressed PCM soundtrack will you hear more of the soundtrack and have a pleasing experience.
(Note: you must have the 6-channel output of your Blu-Ray player connected to an EXT-IN on your receiver/preamp to take advantage of this right now or the use of HDMI).

TACTILE FUN!! :star: :star: / :star: :star: :star: :star: :star:
TRANSDUCER ON/OFF?: ON

LFE was limited in this film, but for Gus’s grand-slam home runs there is a nice pulse of bass in the LFE channel that sets the tactile transducer up for a shake. The vibration through the sofa makes the effect and the film that more enjoyable.


SPECIAL FEATURES :star: :star: / :star: :star: :star: :star: :star:

For Blu-Ray, I find the features to be presented unacceptably – all of the features (except one) are 4:3 – and that is fine because they are standard definition features, but what is unacceptable is that they are not automatically refit to be in their original ratios when stretched on a 16:9 screen. I had to watch all of these features stretched and I shouldn’t have to do that nor should I have to hit the re-size button on my projector (I can’t because my aspect ratio locks in HDMI mode).

Four deleted scenes can view viewed – annoyingly without a “play-all” option – and they are widescreen but taken from SD video. They run under 3 minutes total and don’t add much to the film so don’t worry, don’t think you are missing much from the film!

There are four featurettes:

Mr. October - is a featurette dedicated to Reggie Jackson who plays a short part in this film. Interviews are with Mr. Jackson as well as the cast of The Benchwarmers (8m15s)

Play Ball - is a take on the game from the actors and director (6m06s)

Nerds and Bullies - actors interviews about nerds and bullies mixed up with clips from the film.

Who’s On Deck - the only feature in HD, but nothing to love – it’s just a collection of scenes of the character Howie to the tune of some music (2.43)

You also have the choice to listen to two audio commentaries: one from director Dennis Dugan (who isn’t that exciting to listen to) and the other from David Spade and Jon Heder (equally as unexciting). I would have hoped that the Spade/Heder commentary would have been funny, but it was disappointing…mostly just talk…

Lastly, you can find two previews in high definition: Click and RV.


IN THE END...

The Benchwarmers is an alright film to come from Madison Productions but not one of the better ones. It has a simple plot and a predictable resolution but it does provide for some entertainment. The Blu-Ray disc is impressive and offers more resolution in both audio and video than what DVD can deliver.

Michael Osadciw
July 21, 2006.
 

Steve Tannehill

R.I.P - 4.28.2015
Senior HTF Member
Deceased Member
Joined
Jul 6, 1997
Messages
5,547
Location
DFW
Real Name
Steve Tannehill
Yes, thanks for subjecting yourself to this one. Is this encoded in MPEG2?

Thanks - Steve
 

Michael Osadciw

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
1,457
Real Name
Michael Osadciw
Hi Steve

...not sure about MPEG 2 - if there is a button on the Samsung that informs me of that I have yet to find it! According to an online article from Widescreen Review, I'm sure I read that VC-1 won't be ready for Blu-Ray until around fall. I'll have to read it again. Regardless, the video quality is as good as I've seen on HD-DVD.

Mike
 

Steve Tannehill

R.I.P - 4.28.2015
Senior HTF Member
Deceased Member
Joined
Jul 6, 1997
Messages
5,547
Location
DFW
Real Name
Steve Tannehill
Is there a "display" button that shows things like time remaining, format, etc. on the Samsung? The Toshibas show things like 1080i, VC1, dts, etc., when you hit the display button--very handy.

I'm doing the slow, impatient, hold the credit card back wait for the Sony player...and that is going to be torture once Robocop is released. :)

Glad that the video quality holds up. Ain't high def grand!!!

- Steve
 

Michael Osadciw

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
1,457
Real Name
Michael Osadciw
Hi Steve

The Samsung has an "info" button on it but it doesn't say what video codec is used like the Toshiba did.

I know what you mean about holding back the credit card...arrrggghhh...I'm curious about the Panasonic machine that will be released in September.

I agree hi-def is grand! It's so hard to go back to SD once I've been spoiled with HD...did a comparison between The Terminator Blu-Ray and SD-DVD...if one can't see the difference...sucks to be them!

Mike
 

Neil Joseph

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 16, 1998
Messages
8,332
Real Name
Neil Joseph
How would the video quality compare to the current two best blu-ray disks "Ultraviolet" and "Underworld Evolution"?
 

Michael Osadciw

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
1,457
Real Name
Michael Osadciw
Neil, I have both of those titles here and plan to watch them on the weekend. I'll let the forum know in a form of a review.

Mike
 

Bob Black

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jan 16, 1999
Messages
238
There is another review of this release that is hardly as kind. They have been pretty accurate in reviewing HD-DVD's, as I have 30 titles and the reviewer is generally spot-on. No offense to the other review here, but additional input is always a good thing.


http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/benchwarmers.html

"Colors are also fairly well saturated, though not quite as vivid as the better recent transfers I've seen. I also noticed some apparent noisiness at times on hard-to-reproduce hues like deep reds and blues. Detail is also fairly good if still lacking overall, with the image looking flat most of the time. Some subtleties are visible (most impressive are the brightly-lit daytime baseball sequences) but it never quite achieves the level of three-dimensionality of the best high-def.

Also a problem is pixelization and edginess. I noticed fairly frequent ringing on the lines of the baseball diamond in a couple of shots, as well as some color banding in areas with color gradations, such as horizons. I don't know if this has to do with the fact that Sony is currently using MPEG-2 compression on its Blu-ray titles and this release comes stuffed with extras (see below), but I expect a bit better from pre-recorded HD these days."
 

Michael Osadciw

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
1,457
Real Name
Michael Osadciw
Hi Bob,

I don't think I was too kind to this release...a 7/10 for BD is comparative to a 3.5/5 for a DVD, as I've noted in the review. I've also noted a similar impression with colour - I wasn't that happy with it.

As far as pixelization, edginess, and ringing, I disagree entirely. As of this time the link isn't active so I'm not sure what display device the reviewer is using or if it's calibrated properly. Many displays introduce artefacts of their own that can be confused as problems with source material. That makes a big difference when judging a disc. Thanks for the additional information and this reply isn't intended to discredit the other reviewer.

Mike
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,814
Messages
5,123,752
Members
144,184
Latest member
H-508
Recent bookmarks
0
Top