Time to confess to a moment of stupidity. I have been told by someone who definitely knows, that technical proficiency and technique really are essentially the same thing. I guess I was mixing up "technique" with "style" or "feel." Oops.
The fact is that the better the technique, the better the player. This whole thread largely seems to be a discussion of composition rather than guitar-playing ability. If you liked the solos that Hendrix composed better than the solos that John Petrucci composed, than you naturally think that Hendrix is the better guitar player. Subjectivity is a beautiful thingEven though every musician I listed has brilliant technique, let me try to show you how ultimately meaningless "technique" is if you make it the primary criterion by which to judge musical ability (much less the one and only criterion by which to do so):
By this standard, Kathy Lee Gifford is a greater musician than Bob Dylan.
And Celine Dion is greater than Billie Holiday.
And Michael Bolton is greater than Ray Charles.
I can't argue that Kathy, Celine and Michael aren't in each instance better trained vocalists with greater techniques and wider ranges, but their perfectly articulated, golden-throated fooferal doesn't move me like a single well-placed grunt from Ray Charles, or a quick intake of air before a tired creaky note from Billie, or a raspy huhhh giving way to a warbly harmonica wail from Bob. The difference in their artistry is measured in universes.
We've got alot of guitar players out there with all the technical ability of Celine Dion... and they're every bit as boring. The only thing that matters is the music. Crap played real fast, real clean is just crap played real fast, real clean.
And a great artist can work you over more with a single note than a lesser musician can with a hundred.