Surprisingly good. For a Godzilla film, this has a surprisingly cerebral plot outline. The handling in the setup is very effective. I thought the middle act could have improved, but best film to hit theaters since Cap2 this year.
How wide is the IMAX screen (typical ones are 52'x72', but the one closest to you may be a lot wider/bigger)? If it's within 20% of the 70 foot screen, save the gas.Robert Crawford said:The reason I ask is that my local theater is a brand new complex. It doesn't have an IMAX screen, but it does have a 70 ft wide screen with Dolby Atmos. The nearest IMAX screen is 45 miles away without Dolby Atmos. Which screen would you choose to see it in?
3.5 out of 5. As Godzilla lumbers towards its generally predictable conclusion, you can't help but wonder whether this will be the film to get North American filmgoers to truly embrace the legendary monster. Because even though his popularity as a cult character has soared for decades, he hasn't had the box office draw to match. However, this latest incarnation — though not perfect — is a promising start to what will hopefully flourish as a new franchise.Surprisingly, the ultra-serious (bordering on dour, at times) story by screenwriter Max Borenstein spends a lot of time dwelling on the human characters — who, frankly, aren't all that interesting — making early scenes with the monsters themselves frustrating for their lack of follow-through in the carnage-and-mayhem department. At the same time, even though the flick boasts an impressive cast, much of that talent is underused.
But when the film finally gets to the good stuff — those prolonged sequences of monster-on-monster action — it pays off in a big way. Unlike Roland Emmerich's 1998 version, this 2014 iteration of the iconic character strikes the perfect balance between CG creation and the classic man-in-a-rubber-suit look, and it's made even more perfect by the inclusion of that unmistakable roar. Watching the Big G — in all his building-stomping glory — lay the smack down on his monstrous opponents makes it worth sitting through two acts of build-up, as Edwards' orchestration of the climactic battle is nothing less than operatic. The film's visual effects magnificently convey the scope and magnitude of the destruction, occasionally evoking the passé disaster epics of the late 90's. But Edwards never forgets that it ultimately boils down to the audience rooting for Godzilla to emerge as the champion. That serves as the key differentiator between this new Godzilla film and its previous American incarnation, and it makes all the difference in the world.
Wow, I couldn't disagree more. I'm a believer that less is more and that you can have too much of a big thing. If Big G had been there from the very start I think it would have been too much. The best chillers build up the tension and even make you impatient for the payoff. There really can't be payoff without a buildup.Dalton said:Robert and Travis, I agree with you guys completely. Exactly my thoughts. I was a Godzilla fan as a kid and this movie just didn't have enough of the big guy in it for my tastes.
I thought making the audience wait to see Godzilla was a great idea. However, I think the movie ended up taking the idea of "less is more" to the point where less just became less. It's like the shark in Jaws, once you see it, the surprise and anticipation is over and you can show it freely. I guess I think a little (not a lot) more of the title character would have been nice.Johnny Angell said:Wow, I couldn't disagree more. I'm a believer that less is more and that you can have too much of a big thing. If Big G had been there from the very start I think it would have been too much. The best chillers build up the tension and even make you impatient for the payoff. There really can't be payoff without a buildup.
At the screening I attended they clapped only whenPatrick Sun said:Anyone else's audience cheered at the "money shot" scenes?