It might be from the same source but encodes can be different, one could be superior to the other.RolandL said:I thought the Australian 1959 Journey To the Center of the Earth Blu-ray was said to be the same as TT?
It might be from the same source but encodes can be different, one could be superior to the other.RolandL said:I thought the Australian 1959 Journey To the Center of the Earth Blu-ray was said to be the same as TT?
Can't begin to tell ya how cool it is to see these again. Saw it during the initial run and have always known this as Andy Warhol's FRANKENSTEIN. I've never gotten used to the FLESH FOR FRANKENSTEIN moniker. (I noticed the Criterion laserdisc is on Ebay )RolandL said:
He's listed as one of the four producers.StephenDH said:"Andy Warhol's Frankenstein" is the US title. God knows why as he'd absolutely nothing to do with it.
FfF was the title of the R-rated cut (with or without Warhol wanting his name on it)--RJ992 said:Can't begin to tell ya how cool it is to see these again. Saw it during the initial run and have always known this as Andy Warhol's FRANKENSTEIN. I've never gotten used to the FLESH FOR FRANKENSTEIN moniker. (I noticed the Criterion laserdisc is on Ebay )
That's very surprising to hear. Although I only saw it once in 3D 40 years ago, I didn't recall seeing anything like what is depicted in the animated .gif.Bob Furmanek said:I'm sorry to say it but stereoscopically, this film is a mess.
Colonel Robert V. Bernier was a 3-D expert with 30+ years of experience when he was hired as Technical Advisor on the film. He built the Space-Vision Trioptiscope lens and knew what you could and could not do with it.
Morrissey ignored his expertise and the results speak for themselves. The film is loaded with shots like this which are very hard on the eyes and cannot be fixed.
Frankenstein fixed.gif small.gif
No one should expect that work such as this should be performed gratis.Bob Furmanek said:I wish I knew, Reed. My discussion with Morrissey was not successful. He was willing to pay for an HD scan but wanted the 3-D alignment work done for free.
I wished him luck.
Maybe he got agitated because AW probably didn't have anything to do with it apart from the use of his name.Bob Furmanek said:Warhol was involved with the project right from the start. When I spoke with Paul Morrissey, he got agitated when I referred to film as ANDY WARHOL'S FRANKENSTEIN. He wanted it known as FLESH FOR FRANKENSTEIN.
It began filming in March 1973.
Warhol.JPG
His attitude would be understandable if he were David Lean or Stanley Kubrick . . . . but he isn't.Bob Furmanek said:I agree 100%. I was cordial and made him laugh when I replied that I have this bad habit: I like to eat once in a while.
I just got the impression that he's very old-school and wants an expert to work gratis just for the experience and privilege.
Well, maybe if it was 1981 and I was 20 years old!