FLAC will allow you to do that and is why I still use it, even though disk space is no longer an issue.erew99 said:I'm not overly concerned about disk space.
I just need something that allows easy tagging and the same level of clarity/quality as the disk. If FLAC will do that, then excellent!
erew99 said:I'm not overly concerned about disk space.
I just need something that allows easy tagging and the same level of clarity/quality as the disk. If FLAC will do that, then excellent!
I agree, FLAC is great for a little bit of space saving and great Tagging ability. I use mp3Tag for my FLACs, mp3s, etc. It's not exactly automated. EAC can kind of be setup to be, CUETools/CUERipper too. dBpoweramp (not free) is probably the most automated as far as tagging & ripping goes...I think. Oh, the developer of EAC also released Easy Audio Copy (not free).Dan Driscoll said:FLAC will allow you to do that and is why I still use it, even though disk space is no longer an issue.
The exact capabilities will depend on the specific ripper and encoder that you use; some have more capabilities than others. I'm old school and still use EAC (Exact Audio Copy) for ripping and LAME for encoding. LAME runs seamlessly inside EAC, so it's easy to use. Both are stable and free. EAC also provides direct access to FreeDB, which makes error checking a lot faster.