"This arguement could be applied to either side of the debate, however. No one is forcing anyone to watch any movies,..."
Ah, the ol' "watch the film the way it was made or don't watch it at all, you narrow-minded, puritanical desecrator of art" argument.
You've changed the subject of the debate from the ClearPlay Player and it's real or perceived benefit/harm, to the murky environ of entertainment as art and all the questions therein.
"Bottom line, for me, is that you get the choice to watch or not watch a given piece: to read or not read, to view or not view--- I think you overstep what is a valid decision when you seek to alter all input to fit your definitions."
I remember actually turning my head on the Hannibal brain scene. Seemed like a valid decision at the time. Please forgive me.
Ah, the ol' "watch the film the way it was made or don't watch it at all, you narrow-minded, puritanical desecrator of art" argument.
You've changed the subject of the debate from the ClearPlay Player and it's real or perceived benefit/harm, to the murky environ of entertainment as art and all the questions therein.
"Bottom line, for me, is that you get the choice to watch or not watch a given piece: to read or not read, to view or not view--- I think you overstep what is a valid decision when you seek to alter all input to fit your definitions."
I remember actually turning my head on the Hannibal brain scene. Seemed like a valid decision at the time. Please forgive me.