Frank Anderson
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 1999
- Messages
- 2,667
One issue with the episode.. that storm looked about as thick as the Enterprise itself. Why not just move up or down (or whatever direction you want to call it) and avoid what appeared to be a pretty small issue.Well, if the storm were moving at high warp, when Archer saw it, it still would have been a very long way away, so while it might have appeared thin, it was probably extremely thick.
Rollie I believe you are mixing up "Starfleet" with "Federation". Starfleet has been part of Enterprise from the begining. The Federation has yet to be established.Right on. Thanks for clarifying Frank.
One issue with the episode.. that storm looked about as thick as the Enterprise itself. Why not just move up or down (or whatever direction you want to call it) and avoid what appeared to be a pretty small issue.Yes, this was the biggest thing that bugged me. I can't believe that there was not one direction, in the entire sphere of directions that the Enterprise could travel, that it could not have gone in that direction at Maximum Warp and have avoided that storm. Especially when we finally saw the storm, parts of it did not seem very 'thick' at all.
Another equally true point is, they said the storm was travelling at High Warp. If so, and the Enterprise was stationary, it should have passed by the Enterpise in a matter of seconds, minutes at most. What, was the storm supposed to be as big as an entire quadrant?
Also, on going in the nacelles. They said it was too crowded, yet it seems all 83 went in the same nacelle. Why not split the group in half, 41 in one nacelle and 42 in the other. And Phlox's animals, they had already said the shielding was stronger in sick bay, why'd he move them?
This episode was very poor in the logic department. Didn't anyone on B&B's team think of any of this? Or are they all too big of a$$-ki$$er$.
Yes, this was the biggest thing that bugged me. I can't believe that there was not one direction, in the entire sphere of directions that the Enterprise could travel, that it could not have gone in that direction at Maximum Warp and have avoided that storm. Especially when we finally saw the storm, parts of it did not seem very 'thick' at all.Me too. I was like, they had what, 3 to 4 hours advanced notice. And they could not have gone to warp in at least one direction and have avoided this storm. Do you realize how frickin far they would have travelled in 3 hours at Warp 5, maybe a hair faster, I'm sure Tripp could have eecked out a couple of points higher by doing some creative engineering.
This follows a long Trek tradition of having pretty much only the main characters involved in the principal action, whether appropriately so or not. How many times in TOS episodes does Mr. Spock (or Data in TNG, for that matter) end up tinkering around in Engineering instead of some "assistant head engineer"? Of course, this stinks with regard to verisimilitude, but ST producers have always deemed it de rigueur, both in terms of drama (keeping the audience focussed on the regular protagonists) and budget (not having to hire someone from outside for another speaking part).Local Group said:Quote:
I can't remember, but were they not also travelling "faster than the speed of light"? If so, I would think that would affect their ability to see other phenomena travelling at such velocities.
And, by tradition, all "real" detection in Star Trek has always been done by eyeball.