- Joined
- Jul 3, 1997
- Messages
- 66,745
- Real Name
- Ronald Epstein
It would be fantastic if this was one of the first Atmos titles. The theatrical mix was supposed to be an excellent demonstration of the 3D sonic benefits of Atmos.DP 70 said:I would love this to have Dolby Atmos Audio as I heard in the Cinema.
Fortunately, you are incorrect. Atmos is a very, very capable immersive format in both the theater and at home as long as the mixers utilized the tools at their disposal well. That can be said for any soundtrack, whether it be 5.1 or 7.1 too.Lord Dalek said:Atmos is just another gimmick like EX-ES. I'm not surprised Fox doesn't want to jump on the home bandwagon yet.
DTS said that their new, as yet unnamed (probably under NDA's), consumer 3D audio format set to compete with Atmos is on schedule to be included in some of these Atmos enabled products early 2015 as a firmware update and as a regular item in next year's lineup. DTS's MDA rendering package is now showing up in audio post houses too. They are not going to be calling the consumer version DTS-UHD anymore.DP 70 said:Shame no Dolby Atmos.
Anything which enhances the home cinema experience is not what i'd call a gimmick, Dolby Atmos has great potential, your comment reminds me of those folks back in the thirties when colour film was introduced to the world, they called it a gimmick, i daresay when sound was introduced with The Jazz Singer it was also called a gimmick, i have often heard 3D pop out called a gimmick too, this movie doesn't have any, it doesn't even have good depth, i'll view it in 2D.Lord Dalek said:Atmos is just another gimmick like EX-ES. I'm not surprised Fox doesn't want to jump on the home bandwagon yet.