Criterion ready to release IT’S A MAD MAD MAD MAD WORLD

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Ronald Epstein, Jun 26, 2013.

Tags:
?

How Would you want Criterion to handle MAD WORLD?

  1. I would like to see *everything* that was included on the Laserdisc release even if it does not matc

    119 vote(s)
    65.7%
  2. The film is too long already. Would only want to see those scenes intended for the original RoadSho

    53 vote(s)
    29.3%
  3. All I want is the overture and exit music. Don't need all those extra scenes added

    9 vote(s)
    5.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    9,353
    Likes Received:
    5,296
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    I can help you with that.The film was originally cut to 27 reels. In its various cuts, even with footage moving from one reel to another, the editors locked it within the same 27 reel format, as it remains today for projection.27 reels = 300 minutes.No urban legend, just fact.RAH
     
  2. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,447
    Likes Received:
    4,808
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    It's not your place to tell another member what they can or can not say here!
     
  3. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,447
    Likes Received:
    4,808
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Too much so, I hope there is an announcement soon.
     
    ahollis likes this.
  4. Todd J Moore

    Todd J Moore Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    334
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    Real Name:
    Todd Moore
    Here's how I took Jose's post:

    "I didn't like this movie when I saw it, but I support everything Criterion puts out. Therefore, I will buy it. This isn't the first movie Criterion has released that I didn't like, but I bought all the same. I do this to support Criterion in all they do. In addition, after reading for the love this movie has, when I buy it I will give it another chance to see if there's something I missed."

    This is okay to me, since I've done much the same. As I've mentioned before, I'm a serial fan. I've bought every serial that has been released on DVD, including every release from Alpha. I've even bought ones from Alpha that I saw on VHS from VCI and openly hated like The Clutching Hand. Why? Because I support the release of serials on DVD and will buy any such serial in the hope of seeing more come out. I'd do the same with Blu Ray. So, yes, even if The Clutching Hand or Young Eagles was released on Blu Ray, I'd buy them no matter how much I dislike them. And Jose is far more willing to give IAMMMMW a second chance than I would be to give something I didn't like a second chance. Usually, it's one and done for me.

    In short, there's nothing wrong with Jose's post. His comment about the tantrums also holds water as people are being awfully hot and bothered about the potential news of the release of a film, flipping out each month it's not announced and getting frankly overdramatic.

    That being said, here's how I take Joe's posts:

    "How dare you express a contrary opinion to mine on this movie! You have no right to! Get off this thread you lowly heathen! And nobody else had better suggest I'm overreacting, even when every sentence I write ends with an exclamation point! You think you're so superior because you don't like this movie! Well, I'm superior to you because I DO like it!"

    Seriously, Joe. It was suggested previously by Ron that you not come into this thread if every time you come in, you flip out about something. This seems like sound advice to me. There's no point in getting bent out of shape every other day, especially about a Movie. There's plenty of movies I like that others don't, including my friends. Doesn't bother me one bit that they dislike them. I don't flip on them and say "how dare you dislike that movie! It's the greatest thing ever made!"

    Similarly there are movies I don't care for that others like. Going back to serials for a moment, a lot of serial fans love Undersea Kingdom. Absolutely love it. I don't like it, not one bit. Why? Because I think it's a rather mean-spirited serial. Is it competently made? Yes. Do I get that people love it? Yes. Do I even get why people might love it? Yes. But I dislike it passionately and will express my opinion on any serial message board and not care if people like my opinion or not. Because that's my right. And while people can disagree with my opinion, they can't tell me I can't express that opinion. Mostly because I'd tell them to bugger off, but that's me.

    I think this is one of the major problems of fandom. People become so attached to a movie or series or what have you that they can't stand anyone thinking any different about it. I love serials. Only one of my closest living friends enjoys them, too. This does not bother me. And I wouldn't flip on my friends for disliking serials. If I did, I would have no friends. of course, the other problem being the Internet where people can act as abusive or nasty as they want since they're hidden online and not likely to have a face to face with the person. Honestly, Joe, would you say the things to Jose that you've said here if you met him in person?

    My apologizes to the Moderators if I've overstepped my bounds.
     
  5. Joe Lugoff

    Joe Lugoff Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    262
    Real Name:
    Joe
    That doesn't "prove" it to me, but nothing will.

    But I'll trust you on this and I'm wondering what was in that almost two hours that was removed. Were there additional scenes, or did the scenes we know just run longer? Probably a combination of the two, I guess.
     
  6. Joe Lugoff

    Joe Lugoff Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    262
    Real Name:
    Joe
    Yes, I'll admit that the anticipation and repeated disappointment has driven me insane.

    However, if the announcement comes and it isn't a decent attempt to restore what opened on November 7, 1963, I'll go even insaner.
     
  7. Joe Lugoff

    Joe Lugoff Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    262
    Real Name:
    Joe
    .
     
  8. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,639
    Likes Received:
    4,490
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    Joe, you should be immensely happy very soon.
    I doubt anyone is going to be remotely disappointed.
     
    cb1 likes this.
  9. Joe Lugoff

    Joe Lugoff Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    262
    Real Name:
    Joe
    If I'm going to be happy, that means it can only be one thing. The thing I've waited fifty years for.

    Thanks to R.E. for the best clue yet. :)

    I saw IAMMMMW in its shortened version in April of 1964. I knew as I was watching it it was destined to be one of my most favorite movies of all time. I also knew, even then, that a good half hour was cut from it. I wanted to see that half hour that long ago, almost fifty years ago.

    If it turns out I don't like it, boy, will I feel silly. :rolleyes:
     
  10. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    9,353
    Likes Received:
    5,296
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Appreciate your taking my word for it. Your "proof" would come in the form of editorial notes, daily production reports, camera reports, and the final line script. All of which can be made available to you. There were a myriad of other plots and sub-plots, inclusive of one in which Rooney and Hackett, while away an hour or so waiting for Jim Backus to wake up, by massaging sun tan lotion into a leggy chorine.

    There are the colloquies, which went on forever, about 12 pages of them.

    A discussion, which contains my favorite line in the film, after Tracy identifies himself at the big W, with Ms Merman asking innocently, "but what about those of us that were just passengers..."

    Mr. Tracy's family problems, with his brother-in-law asking for a loan to open a restaurant, and which Tracy's wife told her brother that he would receive. On top of which are Tracy's daughter's problems -- all 6'5" of her.

    And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

    Keep in mind that from first assemblage to the premiere cut, only 100 minutes were deleted.

    RAH
     
  11. Joe Lugoff

    Joe Lugoff Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    262
    Real Name:
    Joe
    But 100 minutes is a full length movie in itself.

    I don't understand this. Why did they film so much? Were they intending to release a five hour movie? Of course not. So why go to the time and expense of doing it when they knew so much would be removed? Are all movies made that way? I know they're not.

    My favorite line in your answer was this:"All of which can be made available to you."

    I'd like to see what you called the "final line script." How can I? Thanks for whatever you can do.
     
  12. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    9,353
    Likes Received:
    5,296
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    All of the Kramer files, inclusive of the line script can be requested via UCLA. There would probably be some minimal charge for copying.

    Simply request access or copying of "Editor's line script."

    RAH
     
  13. Steve Tannehill

    Steve Tannehill Ambassador

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 1997
    Messages:
    5,547
    Likes Received:
    214
    Location:
    DFW
    Real Name:
    Steve Tannehill
  14. darkrock17

    darkrock17 Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    162
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    Real Name:
    Andrew McClure
    This special from the Stanley Kramer Collection would make a great special feature to included in this forth coming release. Can you imagine the three of these comedian's doing serious scenes from some of Kramer's noted works. Anything with Jonathan is going to be gold.
     
    ahollis likes this.
  15. Steve Tannehill

    Steve Tannehill Ambassador

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 1997
    Messages:
    5,547
    Likes Received:
    214
    Location:
    DFW
    Real Name:
    Steve Tannehill
    Typos like comming instead of coming drive me crazy. I created an account and fixed two of these in the HTF paragraph and sentence.
     
  16. rmw650

    rmw650 Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    1,556
    Likes Received:
    404
    Real Name:
    Richard W
    Let's just hope for an announcement real soon on this and it's all what we hope this newest and special release is going to turn out to be, not only to make a lot of us fans of the movie happy and excited about the potential release, but at the same time to prevent Joe Lugoff from going off the deep end and causing himself a heart attack and going insane at the same time. We should know something soon, as Ron has been alluding to.
     
    battlebeast likes this.
  17. cadavra

    cadavra Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    66
    Real Name:
    mike schlesinger
    I am constantly getting zinged on my Facebook page for calling this the Greatest. Movie. Ever. And you know what? That's fine. In the greater scheme of things, it's still just a movie, and I judge no one for not agreeing with me on this or any other topic.

    Mike S.
     
    Rob_Ray, bujaki and ahollis like this.
  18. OliverK

    OliverK Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    802
    It is not unusual for first cuts to be immensly long and contrary to IAMMMMW other movies have been shortened much more than their maker wanted them to be shortened.Two high profile examples of directors who had this issue more than once are Erich von Stroheim and Sam Peckinpah. Another movie that famously was to be intended at some point to come out as two movies was the 1962 version of Cleopatra, it would have had two parts of about 3 hours each and eneded up at one movie with a runtime of roughly 4 hours - you do the math as to how much was cut.
     
  19. Joe Lugoff

    Joe Lugoff Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    262
    Real Name:
    Joe
    That's why I never proclaim anything to be the "best" or "greatest." I just say it's my "favorite."* That's an inarguable fact. Of course, I still get put down and made fun of for it because I didn't say The Shawshank Redemption or The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, I guess.

    *Actually, It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World is my second most favorite movie of all time. I know you don't care, but I'm just saying.
     
    ahollis likes this.
  20. Rob_Ray

    Rob_Ray Screenwriter
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,822
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Location:
    Southern California
    Real Name:
    Rob Ray
    Mike,

    Are you telling us that you think IAMMMMW is greater than "Sh! the Octopus?" High praise indeed!
     
    Danny Burk and William Ferry like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page