Criterion Press Release: On The Waterfront (Blu-ray)

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Ronald Epstein, Nov 15, 2012.

  1. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,388
    Likes Received:
    4,354
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
     
  2. oscar_merkx

    oscar_merkx Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    7,632
    Likes Received:
    1
    Truly outstanding news
    :D
     
  3. Russell G

    Russell G Fake Shemp
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,147
    Likes Received:
    555
    Location:
    Deadmonton
    Real Name:
    Russell
    Agree! Those specs make this look like one of the best Criterion releases period. Can't wait.
     
  4. JoHud

    JoHud Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,200
    Likes Received:
    498
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak
    This one's loaded with extras. Also, this is a rare instance in which both 1.33:1 academy ratio and 1.85:1 widescreen presentations will be available. Is there debate on which is the "correct" presentation?
    Edit: Missed that the default is 1.66:1. That makes three different aspect ratios!
     
  5. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,740
    Likes Received:
    5,050
    http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/319469/aspect-ratio-research/1650#post_4001936
     
  6. Pioneer14

    Pioneer14 Extra

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Must Own!:cool:
     
  7. Mark-P

    Mark-P Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    890
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    That's one way to shut everybody up: offer the film in every conceivable aspect ratio! :)
     
  8. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,740
    Likes Received:
    5,050
    What about 1.75 and 2.1?
     
  9. Yorkshire

    Yorkshire Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,376
    Likes Received:
    309
    Real Name:
    Steve
    Three minutes. Is that a record?
    :D
    Steve W
     
  10. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,388
    Likes Received:
    4,354
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    NOW AVAILABLE FOR PREORDER
     
  11. Dick

    Dick Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 1999
    Messages:
    5,454
    Likes Received:
    1,495
    Real Name:
    Rick
    I'm thrilled about this BD except for one aspect of it: The Richard Schickel commentary. I realize Schickel is considered to be somewhat of a Kazan expert, but having just listened to his commentaries for A TREE GROWS IN BROOKLYN and THE WILD RIVER, I am not optimistic. I once considered Schickel to be an insightful critic (his book The Disney Version was inspiring for me), but he is not an articulate commentator, perhaps because he does not do the preparation or have his notes lined up for the recording session. If Roger Ebert had given us the Kazan tracks or the Eastwood tracks, he'd have been fully prepared, and his commentaries would have been dense and informative. With Schickel, you get a lot of "And here we see..." comments that do nothing more than describe what we can plainly see for ourselves onscreen! Kazan deserved a better biographer and video commenator. I wish Criterion had broken free from his shallow track to give us a truly educational historian track. Oh, well.
     
  12. Mark-P

    Mark-P Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    890
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    Blu-ray.com has screencaps up. I think the 1.66:1 is probably ideal and is the version I will choose to view. However, Criterion made a bum decision with the so-called "full-aperture" 1.33:1 version. The problem is, it is slightly side-cropped compared to the other two widescreen versions. They had the erroneous idea that the ratio should be 1.33:1 instead of 1.37:1. If they had done it right, there would have been no cropping at all of the full-aperture version. :(
     

Share This Page