Batteries Not Included Cover Art (1 Viewer)

[Michael Pakula]

I found this on amazon and this must be some of the worst cover art i've seen in a while. Does anyone happen to know anything about the two dvds?. Does the one with the newer cover art have better Picture Quality?.

New Batteries Not Included Cover Art
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/07...1.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Original Batteries Not Included Cover Art
http://www.dvdempire.com/Exec/v4_ite..._id=4347&tab=5


-Mike

 

[Joel C]

They are the same disc. I loved the old art, the new one looks like direct to video Home Alone 5.

 

[Haden]

Both suck.

 

[MikeEckman]

Wow....that is terrible. I have the original and am glad to own it. This was one of my favorite movies as a kid.


And Im curious, why would you say this? The original cover is the original poster art. Its a nice drawing that gives a small glimpse as to what the movie is about without ruining anything.

 

[David Brashear]

What is Universal thinking? First Frightners, then 1941, now this. Leave the covers alone. They were fine in the first place. By the way, has anyone seen the "new and improved" artwork for Universal''s Streets of Fire dvd? Dear god, I'm glad I bought the original when I did.