I already read it and edited my post.Peter Apruzzese said:Here's Bobs post on Sabrina:http://www.hometheaterforum.com/topic/313215-aspect-ratio-documentation/?p=3813843Boxoffice mag said 1.75, Paramount policy indicates 1.66.
I already read it and edited my post.Peter Apruzzese said:Here's Bobs post on Sabrina:http://www.hometheaterforum.com/topic/313215-aspect-ratio-documentation/?p=3813843Boxoffice mag said 1.75, Paramount policy indicates 1.66.
It's interesting that the director himself was mulling over different ratios, rather than just accepting the studios preferred house ratio. Has this information come from some production documentation?Bob Furmanek said:Wilder had initially planned SABRINA for 2.1 widescreen but settled on 1.75:1 before the start of principal photography in New York on September 28, 1953.
EddieLarkin said:Hi Bob. I'd be very interested to know if you have to hand any trades documentation for the U.S. release of Generale Della Rovere? It was released in the U.S. on November 21st, 1960, at least according to imdb.
Although it's worth pointing out that regardless of their recommendation of standard for the documentary, they've still gone with 1.65:1 for Madame de, which will have been completed in France, mid-1953 at the latest, maybe earlier (it opened September '53). Perhaps the U.S. distributor wanted it playing in widescreen regardless.Bob Furmanek said:Interesting to note that Boxoffice specified standard ratio for that film even though the widescreen transition in theaters was over a year old at that time..
Which forum?Bob Furmanek said:It's been brought to my attention that the usual on-line suspects who have been seeing SABRINA in the standard ratio for the past 50 years on TV, repertory bookings and home video cannot accept the fact that it was composed for widescreen.
If the pro-widescreen comments from Billy Wilder to Variety seven weeks before the start of principal photography are not adequate, here is the Variety production listing from October 2, 1953, four days after cameras rolled on location in New York.
I rest my case...
Untitled-1.jpg
I don't think it was this forum. Hell, I'm going to rebuy this title on BD since RAH confirmed that this upcoming BD will be in OAR.haineshisway said:Which forum?