Aspect Ratio Documentation

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Bob Furmanek, Mar 20, 2012.

  1. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    5,126
    Was it produced with UI financing?
     
  2. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    I would have thought Hammer had enough of their own money back then, maybe Universal gave some cash for distribution rights but i imagine that Hammer controlled the production of the movie.
     
  3. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    5,126
    Rick2001ad and HDvision like this.
  4. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    I watched The Quatermass Experiment on BBC 2 HD last night, the film is from 1955 and they were showing it in what looked like a 1.37:1 aspect ratio, it looked very good except for some minor sharpening in a handful of scenes which caused some very light halo's on black suits against light backgrounds, minor though and overall it looked very good for a television HD broadcast.

    I'm just wondering what the aspect ratio for the film would originally have been.
     
  5. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    5,126
    Definitely widescreen, it began shooting October 12. 1954. It's either 1.65, 1.66 or 1.75:1.
     
    FoxyMulder likes this.
  6. John Hodson

    John Hodson Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    4,524
    Likes Received:
    313
    Location:
    Bolton, Lancashire
    Real Name:
    John
    This is where I came in :D I've zoomed that transfer to an approximation of 1.75:1 (it may, or may not be fully open-matte) and it's a revelation.
     
    Bob Furmanek and FoxyMulder like this.
  7. Rick2001ad

    Rick2001ad Agent

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Real Name:
    Rick Foreman
    Have it on pre-order, many thanks for the hard work Bob!
     
    Bob Furmanek likes this.
  8. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    5,126
    Thanks very much, Rick!
     
  9. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    5,126
    From Mirek at the Latarnia Forum:

     
  10. Moe Dickstein

    Moe Dickstein Filmmaker

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2001
    Messages:
    3,267
    Likes Received:
    919
    Location:
    West Hollywood, CA
    Real Name:
    T R Wilkinson
    So when is someone going to do Hitler reacting to the delay on Mad World?
     
  11. Mike Frezon

    Mike Frezon Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2001
    Messages:
    38,131
    Likes Received:
    5,554
    Location:
    Rensselaer, NY
    Those make me laugh...every...single...time.
     
  12. HDvision

    HDvision Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    190
    Location:
    Paris, France
    Real Name:
    David
    "Damn the evidence, I saw it at seven and it was 1.66:1" LOL
     
  13. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,313
    Likes Received:
    4,685
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Yeah, that was pretty funny.
     
  14. John Hodson

    John Hodson Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    4,524
    Likes Received:
    313
    Location:
    Bolton, Lancashire
    Real Name:
    John
    Speaking of Hammer, specs for October's UK release of The Mummy include:

    • Original UK theatrical aspect ratio: 1.66:1 (the film has never before been released at this aspect ratio)
    • Alternate “full frame” aspect ratio: 1.37:1

    *Sigh*...
     
  15. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    5,126
    Truth be told, BRIDES is most likely 1.75:1. Same for THE MUMMY.

    But who's listening?
     
  16. HDvision

    HDvision Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    190
    Location:
    Paris, France
    Real Name:
    David
    Nazis. Aspect ratio fascists, meat cleaver at the ready?
     
    Bob Furmanek likes this.
  17. John Hodson

    John Hodson Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    4,524
    Likes Received:
    313
    Location:
    Bolton, Lancashire
    Real Name:
    John
    This whole thing is beyond a joke; as I've said in another thread, the irony is that the new BD of Brides of Dracula is just a tad wider than Universal's slightly zoomboxed DVD transfer. But it's the cropping at the bottom of the image of the BD that absolutely cripples the presentation. Marry the two together - the BD's extra width, the DVD's extra image at the bottom - and the result is an image that measures very nearly 1.75:1...and frames perfectly.

    Meanwhile Hammer, well, their fixation with presenting The Mummy with a totally redundant 1.37:1 transfer is ridiculous. Not a fully open-matte 1.33:1 presentation, but a proper Academy ratio transfer to sit alongside the 1.66:1. And their point? Only they know, but I have a good idea.

    The Quatermass Xperiment is coming to BD shortly (an Australian release, but a UK one will surely follow), and I have little doubt it will be Academy only, as per the recent UK broadcast, Hammer insisting that it's not a widescreen production, when patently it is. Madness.
     
  18. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,751
    Likes Received:
    5,126
    If you can get through to them, good luck!

    I've stopped trying.
     
  19. EddieLarkin

    EddieLarkin Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2012
    Messages:
    989
    Likes Received:
    464
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    Real Name:
    Nick
    Ugh. Another open matte Blu-ray presentation of an obvious widescreen film to add to the list. Their obsession with 1.66:1 is frustrating but bearable. This 1.37:1 nonsense is infuriating.
     
  20. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    I just don't get it with Hammer, they should have documentation telling them exactly the aspect ratio of their films, it's strange they are not getting things right, maybe they will use this as an excuse to double dip and re-release all their titles with the correct aspect ratio in the future.
     

Share This Page