A Few Words About A few words about...™ The Quiet Man -- in Blu-ray

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Robert Harris, Jan 22, 2013.

  1. ScottHM

    ScottHM Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    USA
    Real Name:
    Scott
    I got mine yesterday and viewed about 10-15 minutes of it, and while it is an order of magnitude better than the DVD I'm still a bit disapointed in it. It's difficult to complain about a Blu-ray that looks so much better than the DVD, yet I was hoping for a bit more. Overall it looks a little flat and seems to be lacking in contrast. ---------------
     
  2. JoeDoakes

    JoeDoakes Cinematographer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    664
    Real Name:
    Ray
    Any guess what would cause something like that?
     
  3. JoeDoakes

    JoeDoakes Cinematographer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    664
    Real Name:
    Ray
    When you have releases that are put in display shelves at places like Walmart, the cardboard covers can make them more eyecatching and may help increase sales. The Quiet Man might make Walmart but none of Olive's other releases have, so I can understand the use of the slipcover on this release.
     
  4. OliverK

    OliverK Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    802
    The screencaps over on Blu-Ray.com look rather strange and not like the second coming, they are rather in sync with what you and RAH have to say about the disc. The reviewer who gave it a 5 out of 5 is somebody whose opinion about the picture quality of a movie I would never trust as he has been far off more often than once and he is also remarkably insensitive to even the most obvious examples of grain/noise reduction.
     
  5. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,191
    Likes Received:
    2,264
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    Haven't seen the caps - try never to look at them. I was just reporting on the reaction to them on various boards, which is that they thought it was the second coming or something. It does look like the second coming when compared to any previous home video release - that's what fools people. But the contrast is way too milky and light to be representative of dye transfer Technicolor.
     
  6. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    9,346
    Likes Received:
    5,277
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Scans handled incorrectly.
    RAH
     
  7. Russell G

    Russell G Fake Shemp
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,211
    Likes Received:
    569
    Location:
    Deadmonton
    Real Name:
    Russell
    It's kind of sad that a transfer that seems to at best be described as decent and not terrible will get me to finally buy this film and watch it for the first time. Thanks for the words once again Mr. Harris!
     
  8. Joel Fontenot

    Joel Fontenot Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 1999
    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    150
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Real Name:
    Joel Fontenot
    I am going to get this, even if it's not the absolute best it can be - it seems to be miles ahead of my old Artisan DVD release. Hopefully, the interest may spur a better future effort. I will say that the screen caps I've seen do tend to illustrate some of the issues that Mr. Harris describes. You can see some of the registration problems as you move out from the center of the frame. Still, the general definition in the colors looks so much better than before.
     
  9. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    9,346
    Likes Received:
    5,277
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Color on three-strip is simple, as everything that was there in 1952, is there is 2013. Silver halide crystals do not fade, and perfection is attainable.
    With our current technology, there is no reason to have any of the problems that I'm seeing on this film
    RAH
     
  10. JoHud

    JoHud Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    513
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak
    I recall some of the early press on this title state it was going to be "restored," yet none of the advertising or description on the front of back cover art of the disc state such. Did they back out of such an endeavor, or am I misremembering? Edit: Checked the press release and it was indeed advertised as "remastered" like it is on the release packaging. It must have been from before the disc was officially announced by Olive Films.
    I'm curious on whether this would happen, even with Olive's new and upcoming John Wayne titles. A deal with Wal-Mart (or other major department store) for in-store shelf space would be a huge boost in sales or business in general, especially for a small outfit like Olive. However, I find it somewhat unlikely. Did Criterion's Stagecoach ever make it to Wal-Mart shelves? I only ever recall seeing it at Best Buy. Though I haven't visited a Barnes & Noble store lately, I had never even seen an Olive title sold there either, and they specialize in getting shelf-space on some of the more niche home video releases. However, you are right in that is generally the purpose of those sleeves on single-disc cases. Universal used them for many of their 100th anniversary blu-ray and DVD releases with the same sort of sleeve Olive is using for the some purpose of on-the-shelf marketing. I'm with RAH on the uselessness of this sort of sleeve in general. At least the Kino sleeves and other similarly designed sleeves hold the disc inside without it slipping through the top or bottom.
     
  11. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,191
    Likes Received:
    2,264
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    While getting in Walmart might "seem" like a huge boost in sales, you can bet your boots that Walmart would not be ordering more than a handful of copies for most stores and they'd be doing so at a HUGELY discounted rate and then, if they don't sell, they can return every one of them. And is it available there? Because for my money it would be silly of Olive to put it in Walmart considering the downsides.
     
  12. Persianimmortal

    Persianimmortal Screenwriter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Location:
    Canberra, Australia
    Real Name:
    Koroush Ghazi
    You might have to explain to me how any cardboard slipcover, which is usually just a mirror of the case artwork in most instances, makes a blu-ray any more-eye catching on a shelf. I can understand special lenticular (3D-like) or shiny embossed covers may get more attention, but the majority are standard slipcovers I've been getting with a range of my blu-rays (and which end up in the bin moments after I take them off) - they aren't anything worth wasting resources on. I admire Twilight Time for not going down the slipcover path, and I hope Olive quickly reverses its decision to do so. Put the money into something more productive please.
     
  13. Russell G

    Russell G Fake Shemp
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,211
    Likes Received:
    569
    Location:
    Deadmonton
    Real Name:
    Russell
    Sli
    Slip covers typically allow for a slightly larger front graphic and definitely larger text on the spin since the bluray case is skinny and rounded on the sides, and has that dumb blue plastic above the clear plastic sleeve that the insert slips into forcing smaller front graphics. That would be my guess as to why they are so common and more eye catching then those without. That said, I stand by my opinion that what makes Criterion Collection cases so beautiful on and off the shelf is their lack of using the dumb blu-ray standard cases or slipcovers on single title releases. :)
     
  14. Scott Calvert

    Scott Calvert Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 1998
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    2
    Watched this last night and I am very pleased considering what has come before and that Olive is a pretty rinky-dink outfit (IMO). Yes the blacks aren't the best ever in a lot of scenes (I assume this is what is meant by "milky") and there are some registration issues. But it looks pretty much like film and the colors are great. I'd probably give it a four out of five.
     
  15. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    9,346
    Likes Received:
    5,277
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    You're far too kind and forgiving.
     
  16. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,428
    Likes Received:
    4,790
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Or you're too critical.
    Crawdaddy
     
  17. JParker

    JParker Second Unit

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    5
    RMajidi likes this.
  18. JParker

    JParker Second Unit

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    5
    First, I look forward to seeing this Blu-ray and suspect, despite the flaws discussed, it's still a "quantum leap" from the prior Artisan DVD. At the risk of unintentionally provoking ire, if I may pose a question to anyone who has an answer. Mr. Harris wrote here: http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/323399/while-we-wait-for-a-few-words-about-raiders-of-the-lost-ark-in-blu-ray
    Couldn't Olive had made use of this talent at Paramount? Did they really do this restoration themselves? If it were a little better, I suspect The Quiet Man could serve as a demo for the 4K OLED technology recently screened at CES. http://www.extremetech.com/computing/145155-oled-tvs-at-ces-2013-the-wait-is-nearly-finally-just-about-over-probably Just a question of a hobbyist, as it were; I'm not in "the trade" and there's no potential personal benefit, other than seeing a superlative version of this great film. I realize Olive isn't Paramount, I've no idea why Paramount didn't release or do the Blu-ray themselves, but it's too bad, if Mr. Harris is right, that the Blu-ray doesn't reach the potential inherent in the extant film elements and the film itself.
     
  19. JimMiller

    JimMiller Auditioning

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    6
    Real Name:
    Jim Miller
    Watched my copy today. Comparing it to my DVD, it is much, much sharper. 30% of the shots look absolutely perfect. The rest will do. If this is the best it will look, I can live with it. This is one of my favorite films. I'm not sure if it's because it represents a way of life that was (or maybe never was) but the occasional tear creeps into the eye when I watch it. And thanks, Robert. I always look forward to your reviews and insight.
     
  20. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    9,346
    Likes Received:
    5,277
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    The reality of the situation is that what viewers are seeing, is the typical 600% increase in image quality, along with the difference between an archaic and horrific transfer, and a new high resolution image harvest, used to create a highly flawed final product. This Blu-ray is far from what it has the potential for being, buts shines in comparison to even its best representation on DVD. Unfortunately, for accuracy in reporting and discussion, that is an irrelevant comparison, that continues to be made. The only true and accurate comparison, should be vs. an original 35mm dye transfer print. RAH
     

Share This Page