A Few Words About A few words about...™ Oklahoma! -- in Blu-ray

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Robert Harris, May 7, 2014.

  1. JoshZ

    JoshZ Second Unit

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    Boston
    Real Name:
    Joshua Zyber
    The only thing that changes when you switch from 1080i to 1080p output on the Blu-ray player is where the deinterlacing takes place - in the player or in the TV. It's possible that one device may have a better processing chip than the other. However, the 30 fps rate on Oklahoma has a very straightforward 2:2 cadence that should be no effort at all for any deinterlacer to handle. If one chip detected the cadence incorrectly and screwed up the deinterlacing, it would likely be immediately noticeable in jaggie and aliasing artifacts all over the place.

    Deinterlacing will have no effect at all on color or contrast.

    I suspect that what you're experiencing here is pure Placebo Effect. You expected to see a difference when you changed the setting, so your brain perceived one.
     
  2. bigshot

    bigshot Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,035
    Likes Received:
    626
    Real Name:
    Stephen
    You're talking about adding *additional* interlacing to increase the frame rate higher. Your monitor is capable of refresh rates much higher than the blu-ray standard. That interlacing setting is intended for football games to make it easier to see the action. It looks very strange with 24 fps material. I agree with you on Oklahoma though... I tried that on my Espon projector and it made the film look amazing, especially during the dream ballet sequence.
     
  3. JoshZ

    JoshZ Second Unit

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    Boston
    Real Name:
    Joshua Zyber
    He specifically said that he's not using frame interpolation.
     
  4. Will Krupp

    Will Krupp Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,580
    Likes Received:
    1,436
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Real Name:
    Will
    Well thanks, I can't TELL you how much I appreciate being dismissed as too stupid to know what I'm actually seeing with my own eyes.

    It would really have been better had you said nothing.
     
    Cine_Capsulas likes this.
  5. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    Get yourself the Spears and Munsil 2nd Edition calibration disc, it will tell you what you need to know, every test under the sun on that disc, maybe your player is doing something right or maybe your television is doing it right ( or wrong ), that disc will tell you.
     
  6. Will Krupp

    Will Krupp Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,580
    Likes Received:
    1,436
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Real Name:
    Will
    I have it, Foxy, thanks.
     
  7. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    14,564
    Likes Received:
    2,962
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    Will, I don't know which Sony model player you have, but I remember reading reviews of Sony models from a couple of years ago that didn't get top marks in video processing of anything except 1080p/24 material (which Oklahoma! is not), so I'd think possibly your TV might do a better job than a Sony player.

    No offense to those who have Sony players (I have one and use it alternately with a PS3 on occasion, another Sony product), but I'm just trying to relate what I remember reading.
     
  8. Will Krupp

    Will Krupp Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,580
    Likes Received:
    1,436
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Real Name:
    Will
    Thanks Matt. I'm in the office and can't think of the model, but it's a 2013.
     
  9. Steve Tannehill

    Steve Tannehill Ambassador

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 1997
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    214
    Location:
    DFW
    Real Name:
    Steve Tannehill
    What should my settings be on a PS3?
     
  10. Mark Booth

    Mark Booth Screenwriter
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 1999
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    554
    Since watching 'Oklahoma!' in the Booth Bijou last weekend, I've not been able to get the tunes out of my head. I keep catching myself humming one number or another. So, I gave up and spent $6.99 to buy the soundtrack album from iTunes. Both of my cars have the ability to sync to my iPhone so I've been playing it while driving. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em! :)

    And the land we belong to is grand....

    Mark
     
    WilliamMcK and ahollis like this.
  11. AnthonyClarke

    AnthonyClarke Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    752
    Location:
    Woodend Victoria Australia
    Real Name:
    Anthony
    I've owned the soundtrack in various forms ... LP and different CD versions -- for as long as I can remember.
    But recently I purchased a great addition to my 'Oklahoma!' collection . the original 1943 cast album, in its original presentation album .. all six original 78 records in perfect almost-unplayed condition. And since I use a brand-new steel needle for every play on my windup Columbia gramophone, the records sound fantastic.
    It's good to be able to sample the original cast 78s and then switch over to the Blu ray of the movie .. both of them representing perfect technologies for their time.
     
    WilliamMcK and Mark Booth like this.
  12. bujaki

    bujaki Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    1,664
    Likes Received:
    885
    Location:
    Richardson, TX
    Real Name:
    Jose Ortiz-Marrero
    Anthony,
    I also own the Oklahoma! 78s, a windup gramophone and steel needles. I find a lot of very well preserved 78s down here in Texas for next to nothing.
     
    WilliamMcK and AnthonyClarke like this.
  13. AnthonyClarke

    AnthonyClarke Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    752
    Location:
    Woodend Victoria Australia
    Real Name:
    Anthony
    You're fortunate, Jose. For us Australians the killer is the postaqe. The album cost me about $10. Postage from the States was, from memory, around $40!
    Blu rays are a lot cheaper to ship..... and PS .. I also have the original 78 album of South Pacific with Mary Martin and Ezio Pinza.
     
    WilliamMcK likes this.
  14. Adam Lenhardt

    Adam Lenhardt Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    16,972
    Likes Received:
    1,729
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    So is this release going to be exclusive to the Rodgers and Hammerstein box set? I'd love to have it, but I can't justify the purchasing the box set when I already have a third of the movies on Blu-Ray.
     
  15. David Weicker

    David Weicker Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,360
    Likes Received:
    631
    Real Name:
    David
    Supposedly Oklahoma and The King And I will be released in October (although the press release mentioned their respective anniversaries, so that could be 2015 and 2016 :). )
     
    Adam Lenhardt likes this.
  16. rsmithjr

    rsmithjr Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    335
    Location:
    Palo Alto, CA
    Real Name:
    Robert Smith
    Well, I am hoping that they will both be reworked. Oklahoma! has some flaws (the day for night buggy ride and the sound), and The King and I is not watchable. If they are fixed, I will buy them both again.
     
  17. Adam Lenhardt

    Adam Lenhardt Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    16,972
    Likes Received:
    1,729
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    Thanks David. Sounds like it's just a matter of waiting, then.
     
  18. Mark Booth

    Mark Booth Screenwriter
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 1999
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    554
    If they are fixed, I will be petitioning Fox for a free replacement for 'The King and I'!Mark
     
    Mark Mayes, WilliamMcK and bryan4999 like this.
  19. JoshZ

    JoshZ Second Unit

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    Boston
    Real Name:
    Joshua Zyber
    I didn't mean to insult you, but you're describing seeing picture quality differences that cannot be the result of simply switching between 1080i and 1080p in your Blu-ray player. That setting does not have any effect at all on color or contrast.

    Either something else is going on with your equipment (perhaps your TV defaults to different calibration presets when it receives different input resolutions, and you weren't aware of it?) or it's Placebo.

    Placebo Effect is a very real and very powerful force. Our brains are wired to perceive things based on what we expect to perceive, and they're very easy to fool.

    I'd suggest that a double-blind viewing comparison is in order. Have a friend or family member randomly switch between 1080i and 1080p settings for you without telling you which you're seeing. He/she should wait the same amount of time between each viewing regardless of whether they actually change the setting or not. If you can consistently identify the difference between one and the other without any external hints, then it's time to investigate what else your TV or Blu-ray player might be doing to alter the video signal beyond the simple deinterlacing that it's supposed to do.
     
  20. Will Krupp

    Will Krupp Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,580
    Likes Received:
    1,436
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Real Name:
    Will
    But that's just it, I'm not really just switching between 1080i and 1080p. I'm switching between "original resolution" which, in this case just happens to be 1080i, and the blanket "1080p" setting. I discovered some time ago that using 1080p as an output bizarrely seems to add an unnecessary layer of processing to the image, which is why I only ever use it for DVD viewing. "Original" delivers a clean, seemingly unmolested image from player to display. OKLAHOMA! is an odd case of the original resolution being 1080i (the only other discs in my collection that I can think of at this resolution are the first two seasons of DOWNTON ABBEY and NPH in COMPANY) which is the only reason I even tried to have the player do the de-interlacing at the source.

    I was surprised that there was a marked difference between the settings and my original question wasn't related to my equipment but what the film, in terms of perceived depth, would have looked like in 1955 to determine which setting was closer to it. Based upon what people have said here and continuing to watch it both ways I have come to the conclusion that "original resolution" is still the best setting.
     
    AnthonyClarke likes this.

Share This Page